Originally posted by: AwaamKiJaan
I am none of those crazies you mentioned, and neither I devalued any "said opinion".đ
My opinion was on people who defend nepotism. Not the concept of nepotism itself.
Those crazies are not what I mentionedâŚthose are the categories mentioned in your original post about the only âtypeâ of ppl who defend nepotismâŚfanatics, paid or personally offended.
Itâs a convenient way to categorise people who have an opposing view because in all 3 cases, there is a personal involvement without objectivity and the opinion can be easily dismissed as bias âŚđ
And yes itâs evident ur view is on the people who defend nepotism and not nepotism itself
But since Iâm a pro at not accepting an opposing view, Iâm wondering what the above approach is of categorising people with an opposing view âŚpro ++ I guess? đ


0