Originally posted by: aye-masakalii
This was exceptionally bad writing. Reminded me of the scene with Raghav parroting Pallavi's dialogues to his staff about not shutting the showroom. I get the intent behind writing the scene, but they did Raghav dirty that day and they did Pallavi dirty today.
They wanted to show them arguing about the plan of action, I'd have much preferred them being aligned on getting Sulochana arrested. The point of conflict could be, Raghav wants to use his contacts and leverage corruption in the system to get her imprisoned right that moment- he already says he has the entire city in his pocket, he can get it done in a second. Pallavi, on the other hand, could insist on following the correct protocol, operating within the law, formal investigation. Raghav calls her out for this mahaanta and tries to explain that this will take too long and the longer she's free, the more havoc she causes in everyone's lives. Pallavi gives back on how the legal system exists for a reason, not just to serve his whims- could even have thrown the Nikhil thing slightly in his face.
Instead, it was extremely out of character for her to not want to punish someone who committed an honest to God crime. She's someone who lives too much by the letter of the law to let this go unpunished.