Kangana wildin' - Page 3

Originally posted by: ninny

He was clearly joking. It's normal for friends to joke around and pull each other's leg rather than being fake sweet. The way people are attacking poor guy for that comment is so absurd.

So far I haven’t attacked him. I just asked a question and called him dobo which is stupid in Gujarati.

Originally posted by: cutejodikangal

That's between them both. Why should he explain that to anyone unless that person is Yami or Radhe ma or whatevre? There is so much intolerance in the people that too for the stuff that is not even concerning them seedha ma behen pe aajaate hai bhai!

Toh aap un logo ko pakdiye Aur unse javaab mange.

He is still the dobo though.

Originally posted by: bakhtaavar

maybe they made this joke / pun between themselves while shooting for Ginny weds sunny

Could be. Par bechari ka wedding pic hi mila tha. 😆 Isiliye dobo (stupid in Gujarati) bola mene.

Originally posted by: oye_nakhrewaali

https://www.instagram.com/p/CPyCvbhlPMH/?utm_medium=copy_link

😆

Someone gave reasoning in this thread that Yami and Vikrant have worked together and that using Radhe ma reference might be an inside joke between them. Similarly we don't know the equation between Vikrant and Kangana and it might as well be that she called him cockroach as a similar inside joke. Friends do have dirty nicknames for their friends. (Although I don't know if Vikrant and Kangana are friends or not)

My point is simply that Why is Vikrant being given benefit of doubt but not Kangana?

On her comment to Ayushmann well she was totally being irrelevant. There is no harm in calling something Simple n Real. As they say Simple is elegant! It's a compliment (which was what Ayushmann meant)

She was trying to impress her traditionalist audience(although failed) by praising anything which is ancient. Her logic was that modern clothing is artificial and that's why it holds no value(she correlated that with Ayushmann "simple"), while Ancient clothing is more complex n intricate and is therefore superior. Whatever be her logic it wasn't needed.

Spare yourself if anyone wants to call me Kangana Bhakt. I'm not blinded by the hate for Kangana so I can see through her comments...

Kangana is a classic example of a bloviator, a faux traditionalist who brings more harm to causes she is trying to represent.

Originally posted by: Zeal17

My point is simply that Why is Vikrant being given benefit of doubt but not Kangana?

Lets burn them both

I never forgave Massey for making that boring ass Death Gung film. I HATED having to sit thru that😆

Originally posted by: Koviljika34

Seriously?

Vikrant Massey is the classic heroes best friend 😆

Kangana is the classic girl who stalks the hero into the gym showers 😆

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

Lets burn them both

I never forgave Massey for making that boring ass Death Gung film. I HATED having to sit thru that😆

Yea burn both or spare both.. only highlighting kangana shows biases of peoole have for "anything" kangana says or does is wrong.

(About vikrant movie, Have not seen it but can understand the sentiment which I had with makers of Ship of Theseus movie lol)

Originally posted by: Zeal17

Someone gave reasoning in this thread that Yami and Vikrant have worked together and that using Radhe ma reference might be an inside joke between them. Similarly we don't know the equation between Vikrant and Kangana and it might as well be that she called him cockroach as a similar inside joke. Friends do have dirty nicknames for their friends. (Although I don't know if Vikrant and Kangana are friends or not)

My point is simply that Why is Vikrant being given benefit of doubt but not Kangana?

On her comment to Ayushmann well she was totally being irrelevant. There is no harm in calling something Simple n Real. As they say Simple is elegant! It's a compliment (which was what Ayushmann meant)

She was trying to impress her traditionalist audience(although failed) by praising anything which is ancient. Her logic was that modern clothing is artificial and that's why it holds no value(she correlated that with Ayushmann "simple"), while Ancient clothing is more complex n intricate and is therefore superior. Whatever be her logic it wasn't needed.

Spare yourself if anyone wants to call me Kangana Bhakt. I'm not blinded by the hate for Kangana so I can see through her comments...

Are you actually being serious or are you simply playing the Devil's Advocate? Kangana, who is known to abuse all and sundry for no reason, should be given benefit of doubt? Is this for real?