Sab daro mat yeh sirf yaad dilaane ke liye likha hai...đ
I love you all chatterbox...đ¤â¤ď¸
🏏IPL 2026: RR vs GT, 52nd Match, at Jaipur🏏
🏏IPL 2026: CSK vs LSG, 53rd Match, at Chennai🏏
🏏IPL 2026: RCB vs MI, 54th Match, at Raipur🏏
FAMILY SUPPORT 9.5
Pakistani Film Stars BANNED but SINGERs are Allowed in Indian Films?
Ameesha Patel targets fake female superstars. Who is she shading here?
BALLOON THERAPY 10.5
Piku vs. Raazi and what the former's success shows
Why does mentioning China make the government so uncomfortable ?
Sab daro mat yeh sirf yaad dilaane ke liye likha hai...đ
I love you all chatterbox...đ¤â¤ď¸
Guys sab ek ek comment karke aa jaaiye..
MF pe post kiye yeh articles??
Guys sab ek ek comment karke aa jaaiye..
Kar dia hai đ
Originally posted by: dusk2dawn
MF pe post kiye yeh articles??
Haan alag alag topics bane the I guess..
Yet to read the article. But if is, then thatâs a first.
The answer to the question is "NO".
"Well, it can be assumed that audience find it interesting to see how lead characters who are poles apart eventually stand for each other, start liking and caring for each other and lastly falling in love."
For some reason, the only way to get people to know each other is to trap them into marriage and lock them in the same room! The state of ITV is truly bad!!
Meh.. I donât think so! ITV still has a long way to go I feel. I donât know whatâs the fascination to show a forced relationship between two people who dislike each other ( or have no connect)đ¤Śđťââď¸
Sone might argue that Saakk has forced marriage too. Maybe it was true initially, but it was included to address the characterâs impulsive nature. There is a whole different meaning and purpose to it. Plus more importantly they were in love.
To establish a love story out of a forced relation is where I have the problem with. Real life doesnât work like that. They need to stop fantasizing these scenarios and putting ideas in foolish young minds.
Originally posted by: rumi_dee
Meh.. I donât think so! ITV still has a long way to go I feel. I donât know whatâs the fascination to show a forced relationship between two people who dislike each other ( or have no connect)đ¤Śđťââď¸
Sone might argue that Saakk has forced marriage too. Maybe it was true initially, but it was included to address the characterâs impulsive nature. There is a whole different meaning and purpose to it. Plus more importantly they were in love.
To establish a love story out of a forced relation is where I have the problem with. Real life doesnât work like that. They need to stop fantasizing these scenarios and putting ideas in foolish young minds.
Righttttt.
I don't disagree that SAAKK's actually wedding was forced. I'm glad Anokhi stated the truth of that to Shaurya's face. Until the end of that episode where she accepted her new role, I wasn't on board. And the purpose isn't to put them in the same room and have them fall in love. Which is what all these other marriages are for. Get married for family's honor or blackmail. Then do cutesy stuff until you start to fall for your captor.
I think the reason these shows fly is because arranged marriage is still the norm. And it makes those trp auntys feel better that marriage with no love in the beginning can end happy. And ITV doesn't like to show anything but romance......very rarely do they do these forced marriages that end in abuse and violence. It's a weird sanskaari bunch!
I hate that we still continue to cultivate this thinking.