Virat is the Victim... - Page 9

Originally posted by: 404_NotFound

Why does she wants him to acknowledge his feelings in front of all .Its between him and Pakhi right? How is her business if she is a deal wife? When did Virat admit to loving Pakhi? He said he had promised someone and never took her name. If his actions has made her feel so then his recent actions should be enough for her to know he doesn't love Pakhi. The pyaar dosti slip up is not enough if that's enough then Virat choosing her over Pakhi should be sufficient as well.

Because pakhi takes out her frustration on Sai. She verbally and physically abuses her. Also because now Virat wants to move ahead from deal part. She was not getting the rights of a wife because of this deal. For her it was a normal marriage till Viart put his conditions. So now he should clear up if deal no longer exists for him

What recent actions exactly- throwing her out of house, standing silent when Pakhi called her a gold digger, calling her mentally unstable. He even stopped Sai when she questioned Pakhi today but remained silent when Pakhi called Sai selfish? If these actions are any indicator no wonder Sai still believes there’s something between Virat and Pakhi. He can’t be soft on her specially after knowing her immoral intentions.

She gave him many chances to come clean. Actions cannot substitute for words. If he was stern with Pakhi that would have been diffietent. She called Sai selfish today & Virat didn’t bat an eyelid. So how will Sai understand if he chose her over Pakhi. She isn’t privy to any of the Virat and Pakhi convo. We as audience knows. But Sai is unaware about pakhi virat convo right So how will she know about changed dyamics?

Originally posted by: asmi_joya

Exactly.. People say he is stuck between two women fighting for him..Has he not created the situation.. Sai insults Pakhi by talking about her not thinking about Samrat, but never does it come in his mind that Samrat is insulted the most, on a daily basis by Pakhi....He has not even ask her to to knock the door before entering and has given Sai looks for taunting Patralekha.. I understand there is no use to getting involved in an argument with Patralekha, but for how long does he expect Sai to not react to her verbal abuse..It has been just one and half day and how many times has this girl bee called khudgarz and that too when since the time this girl has entered this house , she has not done anything for herself, has not even studied.. And he listens to it all..

@ bold I so feel you darling..

Back then when she called her khudgarz and gold digger, his silence was acceptable because he was angry with her but now he is deeply in love with her and thanked her 10 times for reuniting his family. Why the hell doesn't he say stop Pakhi. She is anything but khudgarz. But if his wife tells her that she won't understand what privacy is because she didn't spend time with her husband that's insulting. WTH is wrong with this man. When she was away he was expressive and now back to being soft. I really hope Sai decides to leave and makes him understand that till he doesn't understand that it's frustrating to be around the Chavans and didi, she won't actually return. He can't have both her and his BFF's delusions.

Originally posted by: MuguetDScorpion

Back then when she called her khudgarz and gold digger, his silence was acceptable because he was angry with her but now he is deeply in love with her and thanked her 10 times for reuniting his family. Why the hell doesn't he say stop Pakhi. She is anything but khudgarz. But if his wife tells her that she won't understand what privacy is because she didn't spend time with her husband that's insulting. WTH is wrong with this man. When she was away he was expressive and now back to being soft. I really hope Sai decides to leave and makes him understand that till he doesn't understand that it's frustrating to be around the Chavans and didi, she won't actually return. He can't have both her and his BFF's delusions.

He shows people their place only when Sai is away from him.. separated.. Also his anger.. extreme desire to punish is limited to only Sai..

The man just few moments back was asking Sai kya ho tum.. kaha se aayi ho... Best friend aayi or khudgarz bol gayi.. to the woman who he is love with.. and he is like bolo Pakhi.. suno Pakhi.. Sai galat nahi hai Pakhi..

Virat be like mereko sab maangta.. bff bhi aur Biwi bhi..

Originally posted by: asmi_joya

He shows people their place only when Sai is away from him.. separated.. Also his anger.. extreme desire to punish is limited to only Sai..

The man just few moments back was asking Sai kya ho tum.. kaha se aayi ho... Best friend aayi or khudgarz bol gayi.. to the woman who he is love with.. and he is like bolo Pakhi.. suno Pakhi.. Sai galat nahi hai Pakhi..

Virat be like mereko sab maangta.. bff bhi aur Biwi bhi..

Any man would actually have shut the one who insults his wife like this SIL or not ex lover or not. But Virat will lash out when his wife is not around or just give up. Show her that her self respect means something to you.

Originally posted by: 404_NotFound

who is interested in changing your opinion 🤣. I have a better job to do than this. I share my PoV here and I responded because you quoted my post in another thread with the same response so I replied here.

This is the difference between blind fans of Virat and blind fans of Sai. We are never proud of his mistakes like people are of Sai’s mistakes. We never claim we are proud of Virat for throwing someone out because his wife betrayed his trust. We the blind fans criticize him for his mistakes and pkawse don't tell me defaming someone’s character is acceptable and is less of a crime.

Okay, since you cannot speak to me with respect..let me end it for you..You are no one to judge if I am blind or not..

Secondly, domestic abuse and saying the truth loudly are different because first one is a crime and second one is not.

And maybe your morals and priniciples are bent so you can call saying the truth loud and clear as offence but no legal system in world do..

On the other hand , domestic abuse is very much considered as a legal crime in almost all the countries even if your own sense of judgement does not allow you to consider it one.

And no what Sai is saying is not slander as anyone who has a hotstar sibscription can prove it, she is saying the truth.

Last but not the least if you cannot have a polite discussion without name calling others; you should refrain yourself from replying to my topics.

Originally posted by: Sairat

Okay, since you cannot speak to me with respect..let me end it for you..You are no one to judge if I am blind or not..

Secondly, domestic abuse and saying the truth loudly are different because first one is a crime and second one is not.

And maybe your morals and priniciples are bent so you can call saying the truth loud and clear as offence but no legal system in world do..

On the other hand , domestic abuse is very much considered as a legal crime in almost all the countries even if your own sense of judgement does not allow you to consider it one.

And no what Sai is saying is not slander as anyone who has a hotstar sibscription can prove it, she is saying the truth.

Last but not the least if you cannot have a polite discussion without name calling others; you should refrain yourself from replying to my topics.

Before preaching others spend some time researching about defaming character . Learn the difference between truth and assumptions based on half baked information. Defamation are legally recognized in many countries. If we talk about the legal aspect then hiding a criminal activity is illegal too, getting a mentally unstable girl married is illegal too and stopping the medicines of mentally unstable girl without proper diagnosis is illegal too.

Lastly, stop quoting my post if you can't handle different POVs.

Virat is not the victim

I have come to a conclusion that people here want to support a victim and they are looking for one in every imaginable portion of the show

For me, Virat is not the victim but Sai is inconsistent

If she believes that her marriage is deal marriage and Virat loves Pakhi then why she doesn't understand the reason Pakhi keeps interrupting them?

If I am in a deal marriage, I know this is not permanent, Pakhi-Virat is permanent, why would I say "I am his wife" to Pakhi? What right do I have in a temporary deal marriage?

I would be focused on creating a future without my deal husband's presence, instead of fighting with his love (As Sai believes)

I don't think Sai is under any illusion that Virat loves Pakhi When Sai knows Virat doesn't like Pakhi's presence and she tells him to stop moving or else "Pakhi didi ko bula dungi", this statement makes me feel like she knows he doesn't like Pakhi, in fact he can't stand her around him

Sai can romance with Virat, She can be all nice to him but of course he is having an affair with his bhabhi

Why would anyone who believes that her husband is cheating on her stay with her husband or accept his advances?

One more thing, if Virat's advances towards her are not expressions of his love then what does she think when he is in love with Pakhi and wants to do it with her?

Sai has never felt like a third wheel, Infact she is very assertive when it comes to fighting for her rights as Virat's wife with Pakhi

This is very complex

Simple version of this is that Sai knows Virat has no feelings for Pakhi (clarified in many scenes in past few days) but she uses the information Virat shared with her to put them down

On the domestic violence topic, why do people who believe that it was domestic violence enjoy Sai romancing with her abuser?

Originally posted by: NoraSM

Virat is not the victim

I have come to a conclusion that people here want to support a victim and they are looking for one in every imaginable portion of the show

For me, Virat is not the victim but Sai is inconsistent

If she believes that her marriage is deal marriage and Virat loves Pakhi then why she doesn't understand the reason Pakhi keeps interrupting them?

If I am in a deal marriage, I know this is not permanent, Pakhi-Virat is permanent, why would I say "I am his wife" to Pakhi? What right do I have in a temporary deal marriage?

I would be focused on creating a future without my deal husband's presence, instead of fighting with his love (As Sai believes)

I don't think Sai is under any illusion that Virat loves Pakhi When Sai knows Virat doesn't like Pakhi's presence and she tells him to stop moving or else "Pakhi didi ko bula dungi", this statement makes me feel like she knows he doesn't like Pakhi, in fact he can't stand her around him

Sai can romance with Virat, She can be all nice to him but of course he is having an affair with his bhabhi

Why would anyone who believes that her husband is cheating on her stay with her husband or accept his advances?

One more thing, if Virat's advances towards her are not expressions of his love then what does she think when he is in love with Pakhi and wants to do it with her?

Sai has never felt like a third wheel, Infact she is very assertive when it comes to fighting for her rights as Virat's wife with Pakhi

This is very complex

Simple version of this is that Sai knows Virat has no feelings for Pakhi (clarified in many scenes in past few days) but she uses the information Virat shared with her to put them down

On the domestic violence topic, why do people who believe that it was domestic violence enjoy Sai romancing with her abuser?

GIRRLLLLLLLL.....knocked it out of the park!

This entire post can be summarised in a word that cannot be repeated on this forum....let me PM you

Originally posted by: NoraSM

Virat is not the victim

I have come to a conclusion that people here want to support a victim and they are looking for one in every imaginable portion of the show

For me, Virat is not the victim but Sai is inconsistent

If she believes that her marriage is deal marriage and Virat loves Pakhi then why she doesn't understand the reason Pakhi keeps interrupting them?

If I am in a deal marriage, I know this is not permanent, Pakhi-Virat is permanent, why would I say "I am his wife" to Pakhi? What right do I have in a temporary deal marriage?

I would be focused on creating a future without my deal husband's presence, instead of fighting with his love (As Sai believes)

I don't think Sai is under any illusion that Virat loves Pakhi When Sai knows Virat doesn't like Pakhi's presence and she tells him to stop moving or else "Pakhi didi ko bula dungi", this statement makes me feel like she knows he doesn't like Pakhi, in fact he can't stand her around him

Sai can romance with Virat, She can be all nice to him but of course he is having an affair with his bhabhi

Why would anyone who believes that her husband is cheating on her stay with her husband or accept his advances?

One more thing, if Virat's advances towards her are not expressions of his love then what does she think when he is in love with Pakhi and wants to do it with her?

Sai has never felt like a third wheel, Infact she is very assertive when it comes to fighting for her rights as Virat's wife with Pakhi

This is very complex

Simple version of this is that Sai knows Virat has no feelings for Pakhi (clarified in many scenes in past few days) but she uses the information Virat shared with her to put them down

On the domestic violence topic, why do people who believe that it was domestic violence enjoy Sai romancing with her abuser?

You are 100 percent right ; Sai should stop romancing with Virat and leave CN immediately.

Why talk about character growth!!

And yes cheating cannot be emotional..

Why is Sai , an unapologetic stunborn selfish and manupulative person came to see Virat when he was shot.

She should not have; I agree with you!!

Originally posted by: 404_NotFound

Look who's talking. You were the one who quoted my post, not the other way around. Next time if you expect to have a polite discussion then watch your tone and words . Dont expect polite discussions while getting personal. Well before talking about others morals, I would advise you to look at yourself. Your principles and morals are evident from your posts

Before preaching others spend some time researching about defaming character . Learn the difference between truth and assumptions based on half baked information. Defamation are legally recognized in many countries. If we talk about the legal aspect then hiding a criminal activity is illegal too, getting a mentally unstable girl married is illegal too and stopping the medicines of mentally unstable girl without proper diagnosis is illegal too.

Lastly, stop quoting my post if you can't handle different POVs.

I just scrolled through the topic and its you who needs to be polite ; not me and second I ahve an IHL law degree; you want to have debate on domestic abuse; we can do it..

If you have not watched the episode of getting devkit marriage; you better rewatch it before making such allegations.

Lastly; a person should not himself with a fictional character that he starts attacking actual people.

And please do not reply to this quote if cannot handle basic mannerism.