Can Patralekha's behavior be justified in the name of love? - Page 3

About PP, she did not even flinch when Virat was in pain while she pulled him that stupid beizzati argument.. even when he was in pain while talking to Omi..she did not react..and when finally Aai and Sai wanted him to take for rest and family kind of was quite and okay with it..even a bit remorseful...she came back with yet again a stupid argument.. If this is love, then I have no clue whar to say..

She is turning into a psycho and appears violent at times to me.. today for a moment in her quest to get validation from Virat she kind of forgot the family is there.. I am not sure if it was how it was supposed to be or issue with actor's modulation... When she said mujhe sirf tumhara parvaah hai Virat..she pressed on the word tumhara..instead of parvaah and it sounded like..I only care about you.. really seemed dangerous to me...

In the next line where she says Sai is fooling him , in that sentence she did take a wrong pause.. so I am just confused, if first one was as well a wrong pause or was indented that way..

Ek toh acting nahi samajh aati..ab dialogues bhi samjho..

Originally posted by: _charu_

Firstly she thinks she is so entitled that virat doesn't have a chance to fall for anyone while she is around. She is an obsessive narcissist with zero self respect. She is losing her mind around sai and falling in in deeper shit , which she only created ..which will eventually lead virat to Hate her.

If she truly loved virat she would be happy for him and sai... Care for his feelings and what he wants..rather than what will make her happy.

Exactly! For her, it is always about herself! I don't think she can ever love anyone! She thinks she is much better than Sai so Virat should love only her. But love doesn't happen like that.

Today I saw a vm of patrlekha made by some fan with background music ‘Mika’. Of kamolika and it was looking so apt so to answer your question yaa patra lekha is to ghum what kamolika was to kasauti

Originally posted by: simmi_jp

Today I saw a vm of patrlekha made by some fan with background music ‘Mika’. Of kamolika and it was looking so apt so to answer your question yaa patra lekha is to ghum what kamolika was to kasauti

sorry I meant ‘Nika ’ 😀

Originally posted by: simmi_jp

Today I saw a vm of patrlekha made by some fan with background music ‘Mika’. Of kamolika and it was looking so apt so to answer your question yaa patra lekha is to ghum what kamolika was to kasauti

No please! Komolika was swag!! Neither the character nor the actress have it

Originally posted by: simmi_jp

Today I saw a vm of patrlekha made by some fan with background music ‘Mika’. Of kamolika and it was looking so apt so to answer your question yaa patra lekha is to ghum what kamolika was to kasauti

Yr komolika had swag and class of very different level which the three of them Hina, Aamna, urvashi carried I have not seen any of the season but still some clips on instagram u could hate the character and at the same time be like are yha toe smaj ni aata hassue roue ya Screen kae andar guskar slap that dignified lady ..I hope mae apna phone ya TV na phode due

Originally posted by: Optimist_d

NO!!

It was never love! Not when she blocked him, not when she accepted that vaada(you don't want your loved ones to suffer), not when she called him on her first night, not when she questioned him why he had to go to rescue Sai and so many nots!!

What vaada? ..why does her life revolve around a promise ? In love (actually stupidity and infatuation) , lovers make many unrealistic promises which they can't hold onto. Even if they get married , there is a chance that their love marriage may start falling apart n the promises r down in drain. What value does a promise hold? Virat may have felt something for her but now he doesn't..he can't be crucified for that. What about her own intelligence? How did she dream of finding love by marrying his brother? Stupid delusional woman 🤢

Originally posted by: _charu_

What vaada? ..why does her life revolve around a promise ? In love (actually stupidity and infatuation) , lovers make many unrealistic promises which they can't hold onto. Even if they get married , there is a chance that their love marriage may start falling apart n the promises r down in drain. What value does a promise hold? Virat may have felt something for her but now he doesn't..he can't be crucified for that. What about her own intelligence? How did she dream of finding love by marrying his brother? Stupid delusional woman 🤢

No no, it is no where about that vaada. What I meant is, she did accept to see Virat staying single whole life. Who would want that to their loved ones? Virat had to marry Sai because of the circumstances, otherwise she did plan to jallaofy him being close to Samrat, she actually did that during their sangeet!

If you see those episodes, Virat didn't give her any hope when he met her during her haldi, even her dad asked her to back off, yet, she wanted to proceed further with all the rituals. Because she thought Virat will get jealous seeing her with Samrat(again, no logic!). So irrespective of vaada, she would have still married Samrat, but Virat's promise gave her a reason to put the entire blame on him. All she wants is to see Virat single all his life, regretting the decision of saying no to her(again, she's the one to block him, but she can't see her mistakes).

She is a narcissist! Her life revolves only around her, not around a promise. We don't know how things would have been if Samrat was there with her, but now, all she wants is an upper hand on Virat over everyone in that house. One more thing is, according to her, he rejected her for his family. Now how can he go against his family for Sai? But who can explain to this delusional aatma that both are not same

I have seen people blaming Virat for that promise, but I can't. He clearly stated that he will be a good friend to her. Let's assume he actually promised her for an EMA, but what about her so called intelligence? Didn't she say she is MA pass? Is this how an educated woman behave? Pathetic!