Sleet of Emotional Quivers on RadhaKrishn Love CC#10/DT Nt Pg#41 - Page 102

Created

Last reply

Replies

1.1k

Views

53.6k

Users

21

Likes

1.5k

Frequent Posters

Life_Is_Dutiful thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago

Originally posted by: vyapti

I just wanted to know whether it falls under cyber crime or not.


Actually someone called a person I know posing as bank manager. After some sweet talks he asked her for ATM card details. Then she asked him for the bank branch name from where he is speaking.


Realizing that his plan will not work he gave her assault threats with some description.

Since the call was not recorded I think there is no way to prove it.


Ever since I have heard that I am feeling scared and disgusted.

Ur friend should really go to the cops then because that person was cheating her. What if ur friend had given all those details? She would have lost lot of money then from her bank account. Though there's no proof but still she should report to the police.

FlauntPessimism thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago

Originally posted by: vyapti

I just wanted to know whether it falls under cyber crime or not.


Actually someone called a person I know posing as bank manager. After some sweet talks he asked her for ATM card details. Then she asked him for the bank branch name from where he is speaking.


Realizing that his plan will not work he gave her assault threats with some description.

Since the call was not recorded I think there is no way to prove it.


Ever since I have heard that I am feeling scared and disgusted.

This is bank forgery, your friend should definitely inform the police and report the number


If that person knew her personal details it's all the more threatening

vyapti thumbnail
6th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago

No he did not know her personal details. He called her number arbitrarily and began to act as a manager trying to help a customer.


So there is no harm in reporting the number even though the call was not recorded.

Life_Is_Dutiful thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago

I am watching old episodes and I realized, Baldevi-Dhama story ended so abruptly. 🀣Dhama didn't come to know at all that his pyaari Baldevi is actually Balram. 🀣

Also, Radha was unnecessarily blamed in the Moh and Krodh tracks. It was not at all her fault. She was brainwashed by Visakha and Krishna made it look like she committed a huge mistake by just getting attracted to him. Krishna humiliated her and her father, created rift between two friends Vrishbhaan and Nand and the entire blame fell on Radha. Radha's anger was completely justified. Then in order to do damage control he goes to Barsana as Gopa devi and makes her feel guilty and emotionally manipulates her. In these two tracks Krishna was more at fault than Radha.

Lastly, they didn't show one of the most important phases of the serial, when did Radha fell in love with Krishna? They didn't show that at all.

Edited by Life_Is_Dutiful - 4 years ago
diksha710 thumbnail
Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail 13th Anniversary Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 4 years ago

WTH? Neither Hanuman nor Balram are able to recognize each other? I get why Radha isn’t, but haven’t they shown Balram being aware about his actual identity? 😑😑

https://www.instagram.com/p/COwhZLrgVCU/?igshid=vik6kqiitqy2

RainFire125 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago

Originally posted by: diksha710

WTH? Neither Hanuman nor Balram are able to recognize each other? I get why Radha isn’t, but haven’t they shown Balram being aware about his actual identity? 😑😑

https://www.instagram.com/p/COwhZLrgVCU/?igshid=vik6kqiitqy2


EXACTLY MY POINT!!! HOW CAN THE SO CALLED GODS BE SHOWN SO DUMB IN THE NAME OF CREATIVITY OR FICTION AND ON TOP FANS ARE PRAISING THIS???????

diksha710 thumbnail
Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail 13th Anniversary Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 4 years ago

Originally posted by: RainFire125


EXACTLY MY POINT!!! HOW CAN THE SO CALLED GODS BE SHOWN SO DUMB IN THE NAME OF CREATIVITY OR FICTION AND ON TOP FANS ARE PRAISING THIS???????


Balram has always been shown as a complete idiot in the show, but this is next level!!


Life_Is_Dutiful thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago

Balram toh hai hi certified 'murakh' of the show, I saw a scene that even Hanuman couldn't recognize Krishna. Isn't it funny that a huge bhakt of Lord Ram couldn't recognize his next avatar?

FlauntPessimism thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago

Balram is a comedian of this show to unka na pehchaanna to expected tha, but Hanuman didn't recognize Krishna? Lagta hai ye waala Arjun Hanuman k bina hi lada tha Kurukshetra me

diksha710 thumbnail
Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail 13th Anniversary Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 4 years ago

Forget that. Garuda could not recognize Hanuman. Did he forget that he was summoned by the latter during the war with Indrajeet?

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".