Sleet of Emotional Quivers on RadhaKrishn Love CC#10/DT Nt Pg#41 - Page 101

Originally posted by: vyapti

I think Radha can be called Krishna's consort, since she is Laxmi.

That's like calling Buddha the father of Samb or Parashuram the husband of Seeta or Indra the elder brother of Krishna or Narsingh the uncle of Hiranyakashyapu.

I don't think relations could be made in that way

Originally posted by: diksha710

So, Garuda is unable to recognize Sri Rama and Hanuman. Perfect 👏👏

https://www.instagram.com/p/COk6OJOH2EP/?igshid=12praoa74j9tu

More than this, I don't understand the fear of SuryaDev, he is Hanuman's teacher, and Hanuman respects him, why does he think that he is here to eat him again?

Shouldn't he welcome Hanuman who helped him tame his son Shani

Originally posted by: Life_Is_Dutiful

High level insult of Balram

https://www.instagram.com/p/COmltgXnpC3/?igshid=wvrc8dr2poqz

This is actually a folklore or maybe it's in some scripture I haven't read

So according to this Krishna wanted Hanuman to break the Ahankaar of Balram, since he thought himself to be the most powerful. But that happened years before Kurukshetra war, around the time Pandavas were in exile

By the way considering that Jamvant ji considered Hanuman as his son, would Hanuman be a foster brother to Jamvanti and thereby MamaShree to Samb!!

Now Samb should make use of this relationship and ask Hanuman ji to ensure that his foster sister and his foster nephew get what they want

Lakshmana would be like mere pita and pati dono ko unke mama shree le doobe

By the way people just attended a session by a BORI researcher, she is a Sanskrit professor

According to her Bheeshm wasn't lying of the bed of arrows

"Shan" the word used in the epic for the arrows also mean a very soft grass, and he was taken onto that a bed of that grass

Any inputs

Tagging all for Inputs

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

This is actually a folklore or maybe it's in some scripture I haven't read

So according to this Krishna wanted Hanuman to break the Ahankaar of Balram, since he thought himself to be the most powerful. But that happened years before Kurukshetra war, around the time Pandavas were in exile

They actually showed a similar scene before the gopeshwar mahadev track started. Shiva had taken the form of an old man and was blocking the path and Balram got agitated and tried to move the old man but couldn't and finally Shiva showed him his true form. In that scene also Krishna was instigating Balram to get more angry and Shiva to teach a lesson to Balram.

RK Hanuman himself has so much attitude and ahankaar. In another scene he was kinda mocking Krishna. Seems like they will show how Radha Krishna will break his ahankaar

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

By the way people just attended a session by a BORI researcher, she is a Sanskrit professor

According to her Bheeshm wasn't lying of the bed of arrows

"Shan" the word used in the epic for the arrows also mean a very soft grass, and he was taken onto that a bed of that grass

Any inputs

Tagging all for Inputs

As far as I have heard, he was on the bed of arrows only till his death. The bhu devi didn't accept him because he had lived longer than his life span so he asked Arjun to kill him in such a way that his body would not be placed on the earth.

Achha....I want to know something. Can giving assault threat on phone (just as a Gaali, with no practical intention) be considered as a cyber crime?

Originally posted by: vyapti

Achha....I want to know something. Can giving assault threat on phone (just as a Gaali, with no practical intention) be considered as a cyber crime?

I think it should come under a cyber crime. Although that would also depend on the flow/sequence of words where this came

But am not sure if there is anyway to prove that such statements were actually uttered

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

I think it should come under a cyber crime. Although that would also depend on the flow/sequence of words where this came

But am not sure if there is anyway to prove that such statements were actually uttered

I just wanted to know whether it falls under cyber crime or not.

Actually someone called a person I know posing as bank manager. After some sweet talks he asked her for ATM card details. Then she asked him for the bank branch name from where he is speaking.

Realizing that his plan will not work he gave her assault threats with some description.

Since the call was not recorded I think there is no way to prove it.

Ever since I have heard that I am feeling scared and disgusted.