Literally just cringing. - Page 2

I m not gonna say it wasn't cringeworthy.

As i saw way more bad in Madhubala . It was okay for me.

And he said they were in a non committed relationship and threw his money on her after acting like she wanted him for money. He didn't describe her as mistress. He described her as a gold digger to be precise.

Poor Pallavi looked so destroyed with all these. Raghav really destroyed her.

But he would be redeemed in his own way. But this hurt is not gonna be any less.

Pallavi will break through this n stay strong.

I expected way more degradation but thankfully the makers didn't go for it

now the promo of Pallus dia makes sense...she telling him, u cant buy everything with money👍🏼

ohh..now i dont even want them to get married..such tortures'

Originally posted by: christobelle

I m not gonna say it wasn't cringeworthy.

As i saw way more bad in Madhubala . It was okay for me.

And he said they were in a non committed relationship and threw his money on her after acting like she wanted him for money. He didn't describe her as mistress. He described her as a gold digger to be precise.

Poor Pallavi looked so destroyed with all these. Raghav really destroyed her.

But he would be redeemed in his own way. But this hurt is not gonna be any less.

Pallavi will break through this n stay strong.

I expected way more degradation but thankfully the makers didn't go for it

Hmm good take..i still dont think throwing money was exactly okay. And yes you are right thank you for clarifying abiut gold digger vs. mistress. Rgardless i thought it was fairly cheap. But you are right couldve probs been a lot more worse.

Originally posted by: xxMATSxx

I love raghav but everything he said today.. as a woman..just beyond cringeworthy. 😵

I though baby shona something is fine.. whatevrr..

But throwing money on her and calling her his mistress in a pretty cheap way..

Pallavi sleeps with him and fakes the anger in front of everyone.. i just.. have no words.

Raghav what you doing man.

Im just a little uncomfortable after todays episode.

I want to edit this post just saying, i still advocate for raghvi marriGe. I hate raghavs behavior but im a full proponent of these 2 characters growing and repenting together. They have to be together to grow amd better some qualities of themselves. Pallu wont forgive him so easily but she will eventually and raghav will repent for sure and i cant wait to see that.

Raghav has to repent, cause ultimately they r the couple😆..

so before all this...so many drama will come up🤪

Originally posted by: samarp2

now the promo of Pallus dia makes sense...she telling him, u cant buy everything with money👍🏼

ohh..now i dont even want them to get married..such tortures'

i hate if wedding happens 😡

Originally posted by: xxMATSxx

Hmm good take..i still dont think throwing money was exactly okay. And yes you are right thank you for clarifying abiut gold digger vs. mistress. Rgardless i thought it was fairly cheap. But you are right couldve probs been a lot more worse.

how can it be ok throwing money on the girl who is respectful

Originally posted by: christobelle

I m not gonna say it wasn't cringeworthy.

As i saw way more bad in Madhubala . It was okay for me.

And he said they were in a non committed relationship and threw his money on her after acting like she wanted him for money. He didn't describe her as mistress. He described her as a gold digger to be precise.

Poor Pallavi looked so destroyed with all these. Raghav really destroyed her.

But he would be redeemed in his own way. But this hurt is not gonna be any less.

Pallavi will break through this n stay strong.

I expected way more degradation but thankfully the makers didn't go for it

Actually he indirectly hinted that they have a "no strings attached" relationship in other words they did "everything" without having to commit for marriage and that's the reason he gave her the ownership of the shop without her having to pay money ..that shop was a payment he made to her in exchange for all the "good times" he spent with her.. and by good times I mean physical relationship..

Originally posted by: rs-shailu29

omg calling her mistress

if pallu falls for such man sorry its unforgivable

no he didn’t call her mistress yr.. he called gold digger not mistress plz nhi ... pehle hi anna ne bhot drama kiya ab aur tadka mt lgao koi

Originally posted by: MistyDawn

Actually he indirectly hinted that they have a "no strings attached" relationship in other words they did "everything" without having to commit for marriage and that's the reason he gave her the ownership of the shop without her having to pay money ..that shop was a payment he made to her in exchange for all the "good times" he spent with her.. and by good times I mean physical relationship..

Thats how i initally interpreted it and i went to mistress but .. idk whay the approprite word is amymore.

It was just that described her in a cheap way.

I want to edit this post just saying, i still advocate for raghvi marriGe. I hate raghavs behavior but im a full proponent of these 2 characters growing and repenting together. They have to be together to grow amd better some qualities of themselves. Pallu wont forgive him so easily but she will eventually and raghav will repent for sure and i cant wait to see that.

You have written it is so right here.... Their marriage will make Raghav and Pallavi repent for all the wrongdoings they did on each other and in that process fall for each other...... so so waiting for this to happen