New promo : Rudhita marriage is illegal now 👏👏 - Page 2

Originally posted by: mprvn36

I agree with you and apologize that I don’t have any intention to support child marraige. Then everything in her life will change. Anirudh cannot keep his promise that he will protect her like a shadow. After nullifying their marriage, if she stays in RC Havel I, People may talk ill about their relationship which was mentioned when she was about to become sati.

Anirudh instead has to let people understand what exactly has happened

Its neither Bondita's fault nor does she wished for it

Instead it was the law...

Now he might not have option to keep her in the house but maybe that's for better right?

Why does that sweet child bear such an atrocious society? Why let her face so early in her age?

Let her be away from all this mess somewhere where she starts aiming to be someone and not be in someone's shadows

Originally posted by: NoraSM

Just wondering, what would be the condition of people when Child Marriage restraint act was came into force, I always thought of it as a good thing, ending Child marriage and all. This show is so messed up with the man who filed a petition to end Child marriage, crying about it, instead of being happy that young girls won't be forced into marriage, I guess there's silent support for this practice, thats why after decades of this act, we are unable to end it, what I don't understand is the way channel is dealing with this, are they trying to show that the act was wrong?

I think it tries to show the price one has to pay to bring a positive change in society. No gain without pain. I don't think they are portraying child marriage restraint act as bad. Anirudh filed the petition mainly for the girls in society more than for Bondita. He can find plenty of other ways to merely keep Bon away from him. Bon is extremely lucky. She is living inside a fairy tale. Eventhough she is a child bride, she never had to face the cruel harsh realities of child marriage. If she was married to someone else, she would have to face it , just like the small girl told Bon. It is not necessary that her husband should be a bad person to happen that. Even if he is a good person, it will happen because everyone thinks it as the right thing to do. Think about kaka. He genuinely loves Bon but because of the naturalization of these traditions he thinks he is doing everything for Bon's betterment and these are the right things to do.

Ani knows the negative side of child marriage and Bon is blissfully unaware of it. Ani knows he can easily save Bon from the ill effects of it without the help of any laws. He just has to take her away from there. Their problem will end. But the social evil of child marriage will continue to exist. The social reformer in him, who cannot see injustice, wants to save other girls too. That might have triggered him to file the petition.

Seeing his expression from the promo, it looks like eventhough he wants to end the evil practice of child marriage, he never actually wanted to end their relation. But when you try to burn down an age old social evil , your own relation will also burn. Let's see how their relation will emerge out of this fire.

Child marriage restraint act is undoubtedly a good thing that happened. It saved countless innocent lives.

Technically all laws become effective only with the date of enactment of it. The staus quo will remain the same. It is upto the people already in child marriage to decide whether they want to continue it or annul it.( This is the real life condition. I don't have any idea of BB world logic)

P.S. This is my assumption thinking this track will come after the exit of Manorama. If they are planning to show it with mano I really don't know what to understand from the promo.

Originally posted by: Indira12

Thank You for sharing Ash ❤️

I guess makers from a long time gave us hints that Rudhita might not be on the cards, but we were so much attached that we tried to overlook it.

They gave a slow destruction to the Rudhita essence, starting from Ani's explanation of the doha and his 'zindagi bhar ka pyaar', and it slowly and gradually began to lose it's charm. So much so that now when we see this we feel that they should be separated because the point to which they have come, it makes no sense to stay together or atleast should not be bonded by the sacred thread of marriage.

I don't know if they will continue their marriage or not but I feel if Ani is allowed to have a hundred emotions because he is a human, Bon too should have someone other than Ani, obviously LATER. I know she loves him (platonically) but if Ani can move out of love, Bon too can do it. She is not bound to fall for Ani just because he has done so much for him (Bon too has done a lot for him, starting from saving his life three times, forgiving Ani's father for all the wrongs he did against her, saved RCs in the nick of time from becoming the slave to GW, and obviously binding the family with all of her love and care, but it does not gets the deserved limelight).

As far as the law is concerned, well the makers have proved it from time to time that they lack knowledge in history, dates and facts. It became an act in 1929 and the show is set in 1920 currently. It was not very easy to pass this law as depicted in the show. Plus, when the act came into force it did not nullified the already existing marriages, except those where the girl wanted it. So no relatability with those.

But yes, IF, I repeat IF they 'want' Bon and Ani separating ways and having a different life partner, we should be prepared for it (no matter how much of an ardent shipper of Rudhita I was 😭).

But not now when bon is not in state to get partner and live so ani should not get now if bon is thrown into emotions mess and societal issues then her pain should not be subsided she is a teen

After leap their life kar tents could be shown different

Originally posted by: Arcturus_S

I think it tries to show the price one has to pay to bring a positive change in society. No gain without pain. I don't think they are portraying child marriage restraint act as bad. Anirudh filed the petition mainly for the girls in society more than for Bondita. He can find plenty of other ways to merely keep Bon away from him. Bon is extremely lucky. She is living inside a fairy tale. Eventhough she is a child bride, she never had to face the cruel harsh realities of child marriage. If she was married to someone else, she would have to face it , just like the small girl told Bon. It is not necessary that her husband should be a bad person to happen that. Even if he is a good person, it will happen because everyone thinks it as the right thing to do. Think about kaka. He genuinely loves Bon but because of the naturalization of these traditions he thinks he is doing everything for Bon's betterment and these are the right things to do.

Ani knows the negative side of child marriage and Bon is blissfully unaware of it. Ani knows he can easily save Bon from the ill effects of it without the help of any laws. He just has to take her away from there. Their problem will end. But the social evil of child marriage will continue to exist. The social reformer in him, who cannot see injustice, wants to save other girls too. That might have triggered him to file the petition.

Seeing his expression from the promo, it looks like eventhough he wants to end the evil practice of child marriage, he never actually wanted to end their relation. But when you try to burn down an age old social evil , your own relation will also burn. Let's see how their relation will emerge out of this fire.

Child marriage restraint act is undoubtedly a good thing that happened. It saved countless innocent lives.

Technically all laws become effective only with the date of enactment of it. The staus quo will remain the same. It is upto the people already in child marriage to decide whether they want to continue it or annul it.( This is the real life condition. I don't have any idea of BB world logic)

P.S. This is my assumption thinking this track will come after the exit of Manorama. If they are planning to show it with mano I really don't know what to understand from the promo.

Right it can have open endings and also bon and anirudh life can change after this direction bon coming out as an idneoendent woman an example for society and realising the harsh reality and how she was put into all of it and what all social evils and emotional pain at hands of her individual she neared it can give us that in order to be inspiration ,bring a change bon has to burn herself

Originally posted by: listmist

https://twitter.com/tellychakkar/status/1380426965551771650?s=19

But wasn't this act passed around 1929 or something, and the current timeline of the show seems to be in 1920 or so

So how come suddenly its passed now? I thought Ani will have a strong struggle before this is passed? was it so easy to bring such laws? This show is messing up timelines and history so bad. I hope they show atleast some struggle from Ani's side and don't show it getting passed out of blue.

Moreover, I had thought it made future child marriages illegal and not really nullify the existing ones. Already married couple have the option to nullify it when they become adults I guess?? Someone please clarify regarding this, I am not sure

Regarding Rudhita, I am okay with their separation, In fact I will be glad if CVs take this route and show Bondita going her way. They anyway have butchered ARC and Rudhita to an extent that I just can't see them together anymore

Originally posted by: listmist

https://twitter.com/tellychakkar/status/1380426965551771650?s=19

If it comes after Manorama's exit, it will be an interesting track. Then it looks like Ani is going to get the taste of his own medicine soon. It will be interesting to see the roles of Anirudh and society flipped. So far society was saying she is your wife and he kept on denying it. Now society will start saying she is not your wife. I'm curious to know his reaction to this changing dynamics

Originally posted by: Alexia_Wilson

No...this act was for the betterment of women, a move done for their empowerment

I guess if she raises her voice then wont it affect what women empowerment is?

Is a woman's true identity with her marriage? The court listening to such a young girl claiming about marriage I feel it will just strengthen their rule thinking

This was the first ever social reform, the Sharda Act

And this raising voice for child marriage? No...

Agreed that it does impact on Bondita but I dont think there must be any such change

There must not be any backing off from annulment of child marriage. Its is indeed a curse no matter how the partner and sasural is good. But for a divorce should there not be a mutual expression of will. Because as per logic annulment will be enforced from. the day it passed on. So its just Anirudh will when the marriage happened and its his will when he broke it, considering the fact that it must be as per the will of partners, or in case of minors probably the guardian of them.. Think of all those cases where a sasural is ready to get rid of a child bride and get another one for monetary benefits.. So who will pay off the righs of the now childbrides.. The law is rightful but it shouldnot do injustice to the victims.. Always men will be favoured, they will marry again who will take the responsibility of those brides if the man has asked to leave just because of law. Here Anirudh is thinking about her future but its not the case with many others. So I believe there must be given a space for mutual expression or alimony or whatever.. it should not be a legal way up for chodi hui aurats

And if this must have been the step, he should have taken much before after properly conveying her the a ill effects.. The issue now is on she being emotionally teared apart and the last nail being taking away the only support system which she feel hers. Why couldnot he assure her any name of relation is not required for him to be her rakshak and they can have the mentor mentee relation which is as beautiful and strong and they will change the history for good.

Originally posted by: Arcturus_S

I think it tries to show the price one has to pay to bring a positive change in society. No gain without pain. I don't think they are portraying child marriage restraint act as bad. Anirudh filed the petition mainly for the girls in society more than for Bondita. He can find plenty of other ways to merely keep Bon away from him. Bon is extremely lucky. She is living inside a fairy tale. Eventhough she is a child bride, she never had to face the cruel harsh realities of child marriage. If she was married to someone else, she would have to face it , just like the small girl told Bon. It is not necessary that her husband should be a bad person to happen that. Even if he is a good person, it will happen because everyone thinks it as the right thing to do. Think about kaka. He genuinely loves Bon but because of the naturalization of these traditions he thinks he is doing everything for Bon's betterment and these are the right things to do.

Ani knows the negative side of child marriage and Bon is blissfully unaware of it. Ani knows he can easily save Bon from the ill effects of it without the help of any laws. He just has to take her away from there. Their problem will end. But the social evil of child marriage will continue to exist. The social reformer in him, who cannot see injustice, wants to save other girls too. That might have triggered him to file the petition.

Seeing his expression from the promo, it looks like eventhough he wants to end the evil practice of child marriage, he never actually wanted to end their relation. But when you try to burn down an age old social evil , your own relation will also burn. Let's see how their relation will emerge out of this fire.

Child marriage restraint act is undoubtedly a good thing that happened. It saved countless innocent lives.

Technically all laws become effective only with the date of enactment of it. The staus quo will remain the same. It is upto the people already in child marriage to decide whether they want to continue it or annul it.( This is the real life condition. I don't have any idea of BB world logic)

P.S. This is my assumption thinking this track will come after the exit of Manorama. If they are planning to show it with mano I really don't know what to understand from the promo.

If Ani didn't want his marriage to end (Their relationship won't end, marriage is just a facade, Their relationship goes deeper than this), Did he want to remain married to Bon? Does he really see her as his wife? you see this poses dozens of questions many of which lie on the ground of sensitivity of the topic, so I am treading slowly

There is a reason why people still practice Child marriage, If you see most reactions on the promo are sad that a bill like this exist, so the promo evokes emotions against Child Marriage restraint act, because they are showing Bon and Ani as a victim of it, instead of presenting her as a beneficiary of the act, the man who filed petition is unhappy, shouldn't this be celebrated if it is good?

Bon would have questions, here Ani should have played a role which assured her that he remains with her regardless of the status of their marriage, their bond and their relationship remains the same but Ani is shown crying about it, which makes me wonder if Channel is trying to tell us that the act was wrong, It is pretty confusing

For example, you post above, where you have presented a dynamic where roles of society and Ani have flipped, so basically even in your dynamic the promo is portraying Ani against the act, When child bride is a victim of it and petitioner is against it. I believe they are not in favor of the act

Originally posted by: faja

There must not be any backing off from annulment of child marriage. Its is indeed a curse no matter how the partner and sasural is good. But for a divorce should there not be a mutual expression of will. Because as per logic annulment will be enforced from. the day it passed on. So its just Anirudh will when the marriage happened and its his will when he broke it, considering the fact that it must be as per the will of partners, or in case of minors probably the guardian of them.. Think of all those cases where a sasural is ready to get rid of a child bride and get another one for monetary benefits.. So who will pay off the righs of the now childbrides.. The law is rightful but it shouldnot do injustice to the victims.. Always men will be favoured, they will marry again who will take the responsibility of those brides if the man has asked to leave just because of law. Here Anirudh is thinking about her future but its not the case with many others. So I believe there must be given a space for mutual expression or alimony or whatever.. it should not be a legal way up for chodi hui aurats

And if this must have been the step, he should have taken much before after properly conveying her the a ill effects.. The issue now is on she being emotionally teared apart and the last nail being taking away the only support system which she feel hers. Why couldnot he assure her any name of relation is not required for him to be her rakshak and they can have the mentor mentee relation which is as beautiful and strong and they will change the history for good.

But there has to be a middle ground. Even if people disagree with it does it make it good? People will diagree and then no effect will be seen

This is the first step to social reforming and women empowerment my dear. You cannot think everything will be perfect from very start. Mistakes are gonna be there. No offence but India had just started understand its opression over their women. For them to actually make everything perfect..I believe is hard,

A middle ground is needed. For the annulment of the marriage there must be some conditions put forth. Blindly making the bride leave the Sasural is not the right thing. And will never be.

Do you actually believe I didnt think of that? Law was itself unstable at the time of British rules.

None can be called Chodi hui aurat! As they werent the ones at fault. But does society ever listen?

From the perspective of Rudhita its understood but from the perspective of others in the same place its not something we have seen.

What are we expecting Anirudh to do? I agree that this was something he has done imperfectly. But do you actually believe its better she live with him? Do actually think he understood the consequences of his actions before this?

Its going to take them time to understand that their relation wasnt just about being spouses. For them this has to be the step.

Just like how for those child brides they need to understand that now the ones whom they called their Sasural are going to be just a past memory.

This India was a patriarchal society and no offence but they never understood the victim's plight. But now reforms are happening. Now they are understanding...

Originally posted by: NoraSM

If Ani didn't want his marriage to end (Their relationship won't end, marriage is just a facade, Their relationship goes deeper than this), Did he want to remain married to Bon? Does he really see her as his wife? you see this poses dozens of questions many of which lie on the ground of sensitivity of the topic, so I am treading slowly

Its pretty confusing if we see it that way. But I want them to feel angry and then understand how blasphemous is child marriage.

For them, this never posed as something bad because they never saw each other in that type of manner where Anirudh wants Bondita to be oppressed or Bondita is being oppressed.

Though Anirudh knows its wrong but does he understand the depth at which its wrong is my doubt tbh