Here's why Rubina winning the entertainment task was JUSTIFIED - Page 3

Originally posted by: KunwaariDaayan

Entertainment is subjective-I get that.

But Rubina didn't do anything. She gave up whilst others slogged their butt's off and actually made an effort. She did zilch, nada. That is why nothing else was shown on Rubina’s so called attempts at trying to entertain. Hence, there was nothing concrete enough to judge the entertainment factor on.

That is why it's so hard to understand or digest. Is that so hard to understand, OCK dear? 🤔

And it would only become a fact that it was actually a 'popularity' contest and not 'entertainment' if it actually came from the horses(BBs) mouth.

Why say its a entertainment task if popularity was gonna be the barometer to judge on!

Thus,only conclusion to draw, is that the whole thing was rigged.

But who's the judge for that? -VOTERS! RUBINA ENTERTAINED THOSE WHO VOTED FOR HER, whatever she did, people found it entertaining, hence voted. Just because you (her hater/critique) didn't find it entertaining doesn't mean others can't!

Let me spell it out for you -Whatever Rubina did was entertaining for the people who voted for her, you thought she didn't do anything entertaining -that's your opinion/choice. Those who voted found her entertaining, hence VOTED -that's their choice/opinion.

Conclusion is, those who voted found her entertaining, hence voted & she won fair & square. You can't dictate what others can find entertaining or not! You might not find her entertaining, others did, kindly learn to accept & respect other's choice too.

Originally posted by: Oye_Chup_Kar

RUBINA ENTERTAINED THOSE WHO VOTED FOR HER, whatever she did, people found it entertaining, hence voted. Just because you (her hater/critique) didn't find it entertaining doesn't mean others can't!

Let me spell it out for you -Whatever Rubina did was entertaining for the people who voted for her, you thought she didn't do anything entertaining -that's your opinion/choice. Those who voted found her entertaining, hence VOTED -that's their choice/opinion.

Conclusion is, those who voted found her entertaining, hence voted & she won fair & square. You can't dictate what others can find entertaining or not! You might not find her entertaining, others did, kindly learn to accept & respect other's choice too.

She didn't do nothing. She even went on like a broken record and said she don't know what to do she doesn't know how to entertain and her pati had to tell her to stop going on as he was embarrassed by it himself.

It was labelled an 'entertainment' task by BB and not a 'popularity' task. And she did nothing that fits the brief for the task. And despite doing nothing, she won. That is what some of us peeps cannot accept or learn to respect. And why respect when one gets free pass for evrything without lifting a finger

Just cuz you fans hve very conveniently given your own twist of 'popularity' doesn't make it facts and doesn't make it one.

Fact is, fans voted in their blind love regardless of 'entertainment' factor or not-makes more sense to say that instead of trying to shove this - it was a 'popularity' contest and not an entertainment contest narrative down throats.

I'm also giving my opinion on it,not dictating, so kindly learn to respect the oppositions views too dear.

Originally posted by: KunwaariDaayan

She didn't do nothing. She even went on like a broken record and said she don't know what to do she doesn't know how to entertain and her pati had to tell her to stop going on as he was embarrassed by it himself.

It was labelled an 'entertainment' task by BB and not a 'popularity' task. And she did nothing that fits the brief for the task. And despite doing nothing, she won. That is what some of us peeps cannot accept or learn to respect. And why respect when one gets free pass for evrything without lifting a finger

Just cuz you fans hve very conveniently given your own twist of 'popularity' doesn't make it facts and doesn't make it one.

Fact is, fans voted in their blind love regardless of 'entertainment' factor or not-makes more sense to say that instead of trying to shove this - it was a 'popularity' contest and not an entertainment contest narrative down throats.

I'm also giving my opinion on it,not dictating, so kindly learn to respect the oppositions views too dear.

You think she didn't do anything, but whatever she did was entertainment for the VOTERS who're the JUDGE! Saying it again, who's to decide what is entertainment? -VOTERS, right? The voters thought whatever Rubina did was entertaining, hence voted, hence she won, simple.

FACT is, the judge -the voters thought Rubina was entertaining, hence they voted (the voters were given the right to decide that by BB), hence she won. That is FACT, rest is all your opinion only.

Lastly, I do respect opposition's views/choice, hence I'm not the one going around TELLING people what should be considered entertainment for them, just like Rubina haters/critiques are doing.

Originally posted by: Oye_Chup_Kar

Who's the judge? -VOTERS. Voters felt whatever Rubina did was entertaining, hence they voted for her. You weren't entertained by her, you didn't voted for her, but majority of fans were indeed entertained by her. Entertainment is subjective. What you find entertaining is probably not entertainment for others.

Err, wait a sec. Your post tried to "justify" Ruby's win and it was written why "haters" "critiques" can't deny that and in my very first comment I tried to explain why the same can't be justified and on what grounds haters and critiques can well deny it as they found that entertainment quotient missing lol.

I don't have an issue with Rubina winning an entertainment task but I'm certainly denying the justification as a hater/critique as you rightly said - Entertainment is subjective"😛

Here's why Rubina Winning the trophy will be JUSTIFIED?

Because she is a khairati winner

Originally posted by: Oye_Chup_Kar

You think she didn't do anything, but whatever she did was entertainment for the VOTERS who're the JUDGE! Saying it again, who's to decide what is entertainment? -VOTERS, right? The voters thought whatever Rubina did was entertaining, hence voted, hence she won, simple.

FACT is, the judge -the voters thought Rubina was entertaining, hence they voted (the voters were given the right to decide that by BB), hence she won. That is FACT, rest is all your opinion only.

Lastly, I do respect opposition's views/choice, hence I'm not the one going around TELLING people what should be considered entertainment for them, just like Rubina haters/critiques are doing.

Entertainment is a form of activity that holds the attention and interest of an audience or gives pleasure and delight or amusement and enjoyment.

That👆is the standard definition of 'entertainment' in any dictionary any book.

So I take it Ruby fans found some delight, some amusement and enjoyment in her going on like a broken record that she don't know what to do, she doesn't know how to entertain?😆Than just say that instead of giving this 'popularity' narrative and haters/critiques going round telling peeps what entertainment is and whatnot then I shall rest ma case.

And if you remember, BB also laid out a brief-guidelines what they cannnot do classed as 'entertainment' - no singing was one of the things which was made clear by BB that they cannot do. Why even lay out such guidelines if it was just supposed to be based on popularity?

And if indeed voting wasn't rigged and based purely on 'popularity' votes , then votes only came from blind love. That is the only 'fact' here.

Originally posted by: AngelAura

Err, wait a sec. Your post tried to "justify" Ruby's win and it was written why "haters" "critiques" can't deny that and in my very first comment I tried to explain why the same can't be justified and on what grounds haters and critiques can well deny it as they found that entertainment quotient missing lol.

I don't have an issue with Rubina winning an entertainment task but I'm certainly denying the justification as a hater/critique as you rightly said - Entertainment is subjective"😛

@Bold, I totally respect that.

& similarly it'd be nice if her haters/critiques would respect the fact that the voters who chose to vote for her probably found her entertaining. As you said, entertainment is subjective. Simple. 😊

Agreeing/disagreeing to hoti rehti hai..as our opinions differ & I respect everyone's opinions. What I don't like when others dictate what to like/dislike/find entertaining based on their choice. Apna choice batao .. but apne choice ko dusro ko mat thopo (not directed at you, but in general). 😊

Entertainment itself is a subjective context. What you find entertaining, others will find boring and vice versa. I genuinely found Arshi ka boring and Vikas ka also because I've seen it before. I liked Ruby's because I like watching her simple as.

Originally posted by: KunwaariDaayan

Entertainment is a form of activity that holds the attention and interest of an audience or gives pleasure and delight or amusement and enjoyment.

That👆is the standard definition of 'entertainment' in any dictionary any book.

So I take it Ruby fans found some delight, some amusement and enjoyment in her going on like a broken record that she don't know what to do, she doesn't know how to entertain?😆Than just say that instead of giving this 'popularity' narrative and haters/critiques going round telling peeps what entertainment is and whatnot then I shall rest ma case.

And if you remember, BB also laid out a brief-guidelines what they cannnot do classed as 'entertainment' - no singing was one of the things which was made clear by BB that they cannot do. Why even lay out such guidelines if it was just supposed to be based on popularity?

And if indeed voting wasn't rigged and based purely on 'popularity' votes , then votes only came from blind love. That is the only 'fact' here.

Entertainment doesn't hold any definite definition, entertainment is subjective.

Yeah Rubina fans probably enjoy watching her do that! -that's probably entertaining for them. So let them be entertained by that na, why question what they find entertaining or not.

Whether the votes came from blind love/or really they were entertained by whatever Rubina did, again our assumption. Fact is, votes came & Rubina won.

You didn't like it -cool, express your displeasure. Others liked it -let's accept & respect that & move on instead of questioning it.

Rubina eating an apple is more entertaining for me than cheap disgusting antics of certain other people. I found her nervousness also cute and natural and entertaining. So voted for her. Entire country voted for her with such a high margin that even biased BB could not stop her win.

Incredible job by fans of ENTERTAINMENT QUEEN RUBINA.