Bigg Boss 14 DDT 13/01/2021 - Page 74

Originally posted by: akniti

Sweet heart, you forgot?

chordo leave it lol

jis jis ne mujhe report ki

Aaj bohot posts udne wale hai 😎

Originally posted by: nehaaa.14

Showmance karne aaya tha par kiya toh nahi usne. Apni Gf ko propose karke yeh showmance wala angle hi khatam kar diya usne. Aur usne apni marzee se propose kiya tha, koi immunity stone paane ke liye nahi kiya tha.

Meri marzee, rakhungi mein iss baat par issue. Yeh show ka theme hi yahi hai ki audience contestants ko unki personality ke hisaab se judge kare. Mereko Rubina ka voh divorce wali baat apni husband ki permission ke bina batana immorally wrong laga toh hai mujhe iss baat par issue. And, initially, Abhinav ko bhi tha iss baat se issue, usne bola bhi tha Rubina ko.

Bold - You proved my point ki Abhinav-Rubina ki situation ko Rahul-Aly se compare nahi kiya jaa sakta. Aly ka support toh phir bhi Rahul ke liye badal sakta hai par Rubina will always enjoy the benefit of his husband's support jab tak Abhinav hai uss ghar mein. Hence, mera initial argument ki Rubina is a hypocrite for taunting others for not playing alone.

But it's okay to lie on first episode that he's looking for a girl? That's okay? 😕 @bold Toh phir even Ruby just said she will leave, she didn't leave nah 😆

Nah I don't feel she did anything wrong by disclosing about divorce. Immunity stone was hers anyway, BB just didn't want to give it her Cus they wanted someone else to be safe.

If Ruby is a hypocrite then what is Rahul? He keeps pointing fingers at Ruby and abhi but when he got asked why he doesn't do the same for jasmine and aly, then he had no answers.

Originally posted by: Nachiketj

Aaj bohot posts udne wale hai 😎

🤣

Originally posted by: Ashhima3

she always claimed, we don’t do this, we don’t use such words! Infact called out for samaan! A woman who made issue for samaan says will you call your daughter ha*** ki? And she never claimed she is devi? And it’s not in literal sense! She has always said I m righteous and this definitely isn’t right

No she hasn't 😕

Salman called Abhinav saaman. Here Sonali called them or Nikki haraamki. Difference hain. Challenging Sonali is different to actually saying X is this that. And if Sonali did not understand this point then she is a lost case trying to be safe for this weeks eviction. Agreed Ruby is wrong to bring a kid in but didn't Sonali think ke oh my, how can I call my daughter this word?

Ruby simply used the wrong example, but her point was absolutely right.

Originally posted by: Nachiketj

You mentioned u work in padiatrics..but u could have become a lawyer...it's a genuine compliment 👍🏼

Oh thanks.

I've done a degree in law too 😆

Originally posted by: MunnaBadnamHua

🤪

No! 😡

Originally posted by: Silveraliax

I appreciate the example but I disagree. I would be upset that you brought in my father just like I am not supporting Ruby for bringing in a kid. But you did not imply that he's a thief because you know yourself you are only showing me a mirror. Intention matters.

Trying telling your father he is a thief.

VS

Your father is a thief.

I feel the latter is wrong.

Okay, I see.

So, what if I say to someone,

'I think you're incredibly thick headed'.

Then, I'm just saying what I think, that doesn't necessarily mean that the person actually is incredibly thick headed.

Main toh bas bol rahi hoon jo mujhe laga, mere bolne se thodi na woh hota hain aur na hi woh abuse ya insult hoti hain. Right? I did not intend to insult or abuse and thus, it should not be seen as that because intention matters. It does. Although, selectively, whether or not we like to admit it.

I'm sure you must now get the implicit function. Suggested but not directly. Suggested enough to stand its ground.

high level discussion chalrhaa ha apan to chala

acha chalta hu ab nahi auga