Please somebody put BAN on these ULTRA REGRESSIVE SHOWS !!!!! - Page 7

Originally posted by: Juhi_04

There are many shows which remain stable for weeks. Yes it's possible that many shows with high ratings are pushed down. That day someone posted a site which shows Top show ratings. Acc. to that, Mirzapur is on top followed by YRKKH. Kundali Bhagya is on 14th rank.

Yeah this one right ? Even i am SHELL SHOCKED !

https://twitter.com/desisLIVE/status/1342621506837344256?s=19

Do you know even an article was published on this where the site who publish real ratings report said BARC data has no credibility bla bla bla...... Anupama dropped to 414th position. I was like SERIOUSLYYYYYYY !!!!!!! 🤣🤣🤣

Originally posted by: Aleyamma47

Naagin 5's ORIGINAL CONCEPT was that two LOST NAAG VANSH LOVERS would RE-UNITE!

1. There is a simple logic here. If Veer is supposed to be the villain, why should the makers glorify him as the handsome guy? And why should Jai shown as a unattractive one? At least they should bring someone least attractive than Mohit, shouldn't they?
2. I like Jai's character as well as Mohit Sehgal but it's the truth. The makers, Ekta mata and Mukta butchered his look to the core.
3. Seriously, if you have seen any one of the Mohit's shows or his offline looks, you can get the point. His hair style, dressing sense and everything is well groomed. But in Naagin 5, his entry didn't have any grandness/simpleness (it is required for hero) but Veer's entry was so grand.
4. In fact in Kalyug, Hriday was shown only 10-15 minutes that too for romancing his naagin. But Akesh got as much importance as Nageshwari got.
5. I also have some doubt like you in the beginning when they start to show Veer as 'bad guy with morals'. But still the first four points make more sense than this point.
6. Ekta always kills characters. Like in, Pardes mein, she killed Raghav etc.. No doubt in that but still here Vani is the pre-planned couple. About article, it can never be always true. It's all PR stunts to increase TRP

Originally posted by: InsaneSoul08

1. There is a simple logic here. If Veer is supposed to be the villain, why should the makers glorify him as the handsome guy? And why should Jai shown as a ugly one? At least they should bring someone least attractive than Mohit, shouldn't they?
2. I like Jai's character as well as Mohit Sehgal but it's the truth. The makers, Ekta mata and Mukta butchered his look to the core.
3. Seriously, if you have seen any one of the Mohit's shows, you can get the point. His hair style, dressing sense and everything is well groomed. But in Naagin 5, his entry didn't have any grandness (it is required for hero) but Veer's entry was so grand.
4. In fact in Kalyug, Hriday was shown only 10-15 minutes that too for romancing his naagin. But Akesh got as much importance as Nageshwari got.
5. I also have some doubt like you in the beginning when they start to show Veer as 'bad guy with morals'. But still the first four points make more sense than this point.
6. Ekta always kills characters. Like in, Pardes mein, she killed Raghav etc.. No doubt in that but still here Vani is the pre-planned couple. About article, it can never be always true. It's all PR stunts to increase TRP

Can I ask you A SIMPLE QUESTION, In REAL LIFE DO YOU JUDGE EVERYONE BY THEIR LOOKS?

And you know what you are saying ARTICLES ARE WRONG!

The very Sharad/Veer fans SAID THE SAME THINGS about MOHIT AND HIS CHARACTER (MOHIT IS SKINNY, HIS HAIR IS NOT GOOD, HE HAS NO CHEMISTRY WITH SURBHI etc.) which is why the whole thing just turning the original plot VICE-VERSA in Naagin 5 happened which was supposed to be something else...

Leave it, YOU WILL STILL CONTINUE ARGUE THIS AND THAT!

But, please don't CATEGORIZE ANY ACTOR by their LOOKS! That he is the ANTAGONIST!

EK has done this ROLE REVERSING CONCEPT SEVERAL TIMES in her several shows and that itself PROVES THAT SHE CAN DO IT HERE TOO!

Finally you feel that THE ARTICLE I POINTED MAY BE WRONG, while I THINK YOUR JUDGMENTS ARE COMPLETELY WRONG!

One more thing is that I don't watch Naagin 5, so I really don't give a big deal about Vani is paired with Veer or the other one (I don't even know Mohit's character name)

So, it really doesn't matter to me if Naagin 5 ends with a happy end of the UNION OF NAAGIN & CHEEL,

I don't really care!

Honestly, I hate that CONCEPT, but it's ok I don't like it, I don't watch the show!

Acc to me (P.S. Personal Opinion) , IT WAS TOTALLY CRAP CONCEPT OF INTRODUCING BY INTRODUCING LOVE STORY OF EAGLE & SNAKE (which are TWO BEINGS WITH SWORN ENMITY IN OUR NATURE),

And this CONCEPT is something like MOCKING NATURE!

And I really don't understand the ITV viewers who can't ACCEPT LGBT and S*X oriented subjects in the IDIOT BOX, can ACCEPT SOME CRAP CONCEPT OF A LOVE STORY OF TWO...

Yeah, I know SUPERNATURAL, but every genre needs to respect certain things...

Anyways, I don't watch it so I don't care who is with who in the SHOW! 🥱

but you seem to be an ARDENT FAN of Naagin 5 and I'm very sorry to say I HATE NAAGIN 5,

That's my personal opinion and nobody can change that!🥱

Originally posted by: Juhi_04

Naagin-Cheel story is not original of Naagin 5. In 2019, there was Naagin-Baaz story in Main Bhi Ardhangani. Did not watch the show but watched its promos.

Plus, as Juhi has said that this Naag-Eagle love story has been already tried in another series. I don't know...

See, though I HATE Naagin 5, I have nothing against it.

I was not trying to defame Naagin 5, but just GIVING IT AS AN EXAMPLE OF EK's ROLE-REVERSING done in her shows (I had also given examples of Kawach & KDB)

So you need not continue explaining to me why VEER is the PROTAGONIST AND MOHIT ANTAGONIST!

As it doesn't matter to me who is the PROTAGONIST/ANTAGONIST in a show I don't even watch!

Originally posted by: Aleyamma47

Can I ask you A SIMPLE QUESTION, In REAL LIFE DO YOU JUDGE EVERYONE BY THEIR LOOKS?

And you know what you are saying ARTICLES ARE WRONG!

The very Sharad/Veer fans SAID THE SAME THINGS about MOHIT AND HIS CHARACTER (MOHIT IS SKINNY, HIS HAIR IS NOT GOOD, HE HAS NO CHEMISTRY WITH SURBHI etc.) which is why the whole thing just turning the original plot VICE-VERSA in Naagin 5 happened which was supposed to be something else...

Leave it, YOU WILL STILL CONTINUE ARGUE THIS AND THAT!

But, please don't CATEGORIZE ANY ACTOR by their LOOKS! That he is the ANTAGONIST!

EK has done this ROLE REVERSING CONCEPT SEVERAL TIMES in her several shows and that itself PROVES THAT SHE CAN DO IT HERE TOO!

Finally you feel that THE ARTICLE I POINTED MAY BE WRONG, while I THINK YOUR JUDGMENTS ARE COMPLETELY WRONG!

One more thing is that I don't watch Naagin 5, so I really don't give a big deal about Vani is paired with Veer or the other one (I don't even know Mohit's character name)

So, it really doesn't matter to me if Naagin 5 ends with a happy end of the UNION OF NAAGIN & CHEEL,

I don't really care!

Honestly, I hate that CONCEPT, but it's ok I don't like it, I don't watch the show!

Acc to me (P.S. Personal Opinion) , IT WAS TOTALLY CRAP CONCEPT OF INTRODUCING BY INTRODUCING LOVE STORY OF EAGLE & SNAKE (which are TWO BEINGS WITH SWORN ENMITY IN OUR NATURE),

And this CONCEPT is something like MOCKING NATURE!

And I really don't understand the ITV viewers who can't ACCEPT LGBT and S*X oriented subjects in the IDIOT BOX, can ACCEPT SOME CRAP CONCEPT OF A LOVE STORY OF TWO...

Yeah, I know SUPERNATURAL, but every genre needs to respect certain things...

Anyways, I don't watch it so I don't care who is with who in the SHOW! 🥱

but you seem to be an ARDENT FAN of Naagin 5 and I'm very sorry to say I HATE NAAGIN 5,

That's my personal opinion and nobody can change that!🥱

Plus, as Juhi has said that this Naag-Eagle love story has been already tried in another series. I don't know...

See, though I HATE Naagin 5, I have nothing against it.

I was not trying to defame Naagin 5, but just GIVING IT AS AN EXAMPLE OF EK's ROLE-REVERSING done in her shows (I had also given examples of Kawach & KDB)

So you need not continue explaining to me why VEER is the PROTAGONIST AND MOHIT ANTAGONIST!

As it doesn't matter to me who is the PROTAGONIST/ANTAGONIST in a show I don't even watch!

See this promo.

https://youtu.be/llQAQjRW2ew

This show came in 2019 but still some dumb people commenting that Naagin 5 ki copy kiya. Ye chutiye log kam se kam video upload date to dekh le agar research karne ka kasht nahi lena hai to.

Originally posted by: Juhi_04

See this promo.

https://youtu.be/llQAQjRW2ew

This show came in 2019 but still some dumb people commenting that Naagin 5 ki copy kiya.

Ye chutiye log kam se kam video upload date to dekh le agar research katne ka kasht nahi lena hai to.

🤣🤣🤣

I shall assume that you haven't seen a single franchise of Naagin. I have seen all the seasons. In season 2, two snakes of different clans are paired. In season 3 & 4, naagin and human end up together. So, in season 5, we can't witness a naag and naagin of same clan to end up together according to Ekta mata.

If the original concept is Naag-Naagins, they should have made Sharad as Naag and Mohit as Eagle in over night by quoting anything can happen in Ekta's show.

Originally posted by: InsaneSoul08

Don't you think its a blunder to compare Ekta's shows to real life?

Ekta's serials or Idiot Box is completely based on look based sterotypical ideologies. Hero means he need to be handsome (stereotype) . Just for example, there is a show called Namak whose hero is not good looking. But he is the hero and also a debut. Do you know how much he was bashed in the show related topics? Many compared him to animal's face.

I am not that immature to categorize actors by looks. Maybe some of my words are misquoted by me or mistook by you. See, Why don't the makers give Mohit a better look and better dialogues if he is supposed to be the ML?

Secondly, if Naag-Naagins are supposed to end up together. There is no story to show further.

Ekta's supernatural shows are based on cross breeding two different species and two different animals.

I shall assume that you haven't seen a single franchise of Naagin. I have seen all the seasons. In season 2, two snakes of different clans are paired. In season 3 & 4, naagin and human end up together. So, in season 5, we can't witness a naag and naagin of same clan to end up together according to Ekta mata.

If the original concept is Naag-Naagins, they should have made Sharad as Naag and Mohit as Eagle in over night by quoting anything can happen in Ekta's show.

About mocking nature, yeah it is. That's why the show is a flop in terms of TRP. In season 3, a naagin consummate with demon. So, it's not new for naagin viewers. I am not a ardent fan of Naagin 5 but I am a fan of the franchise.

@Blue: Madam, you are constantly shaming an actor by looks. 1st you called Mohit as ugly and now another actor as not good looking. Be grateful no one reported you till now.

@Red: Really no story to show further? Is it necessary to be always different types ending together. What were Rocky-Shivani? What were Vikrant-Vishakha? And in Dangal's Naagin show last year, both leads were Naag-Naagin. And yes, they ended together.

@Green: What do you mean by consummation? She was raped via magic. I doubt your age as you confuse rape with consummation. Naagin 5 is getting 1.4 on a well known channel the same rating Dangal version would get on a lesser known channel. It would be a channel topper. 1.4 there is equal to 2.5+. Here the cvs are simply bringing twists and confusing viewers. They are simply attracting viewers by making a FL wear extra-revealing, extra-transparent, extra-shiny clothes with loads make-up and accessories. I am an old-fashioned to crib over revealing clothes but showing a woman who dressed simply before marriage changing style this much drastically is weird. If she dressed like before marriage it would be fine but seeing a Nirupa Roy changing into Zeenat Aman so quickly is ridiculous as changing one's style so drastically takes long time. Shivanya, Shivangi, Bela and even Brinda to some extent did not changed their style so drastically like her. No simple girl changes dressing style so quickly enough to show cleavage and a large part of bare back in every clothes she wears. So its clear that its to attract viewers for ratings.

Originally posted by: Juhi_04

@Blue: Madam, you are constantly shaming an actor by looks. 1st you called Mohit as ugly and now another actor as not good looking. Be grateful no one reported you till now.

@Red: Really no story to show further? Is it necessary to be always different types ending together. What were Rocky-Shivani? What were Vikrant-Vishakha? And in Dangal's Naagin show last year, both leads were Naag-Naagin. And yes, they ended together.

@Green: What do you mean by consummation? She was raped via magic. I doubt your age as you confuse rape with consummation. Naagin 5 is getting 1.4 on a well known channel the same rating Dangal version would get on a lesser known channel. It would be a channel topper. 1.4 there is equal to 2.5+. Here the cvs are simply bringing twists and confusing viewers. They are simply attracting viewers by making a FL wear extra-revealing, extra-transparent, extra-shiny clothes with loads make-up and accessories. I am an old-fashioned to crib over revealing clothes but showing a woman who dressed simply before marriage changing style this much drastically is weird. If she dressed like before marriage it would be fine but seeing a Nirupa Roy changing into Zeenat Aman so quickly is ridiculous as changing one's style so drastically takes long time. Shivanya, Shivangi, Bela and even Brinda to some extent did not changed their style so drastically like her. No simple girl changes dressing style so quickly enough to show cleavage and a large part of bare back in every clothes she wears. So its clear that its to attract viewers for ratings.

Blue - First of all, I am not shaming any one from the looks. I am not that merciless creature. I am saying what people said in the comments. First figure out that. If you really felt so even then, I am sorry for that. What I am saying is, the makers are not concentrating on the looks of Jai. They are making him getting dominated by Veer in terms of everything. You highlight that single point inspite of the above and below justifications simply.

[Edit: For your kind information, I didn't say Mohit as ugly. He is never ugly. The makers shown him unattractive. Please understand what I meant 🙏🙏🙏 It really hurts when I am being judged improperly. ]

Red - yeah no story. The story would end in 10 episodes. If Naag Naagin got paired, either one of them becomes human or the other half dies. Vikrant dies in end. Rocky becomes human. I don't know about Dangal one. Ekta didn't like to end up same species together. That's the truth.

Green - Sorry. I misquoted the words. About dressing sense, there is nothing to say on my behalf. The show is going fast now a days and enemies are revealed very soon without much drama until November end. The makers are going to show something more senseless so that people would hate it this they never want next season.

Originally posted by: InsaneSoul08

[Edit: Articles can be wrong. Mohit Sehgal was rumored to exit the show. There are so many articles that Arijit Taneja is yo enter the show. But both hadn't happened. And Mohit and Arijit cleared the rumors. Rumors, fake articles are very common in Naagin 4th and 5th franchise. I am okay with your references where you mentioned Kavach and Kumkum but Naagin is about mating different species (sorry but it is truth) others are role-reversal kind of. ]

[ Edit 2 - Sorry if you think I am categorizing. Please understand what I say, if he is the main character, then he deserve to be concentrated on looks and they would several look tests. Mohit's character is literally suppressed by Veer in terms of dialogues, fights and counters. ]

Don't you think its a blunder to compare Ekta's shows to real life?

Ekta's serials or Idiot Box is completely based on look based sterotypical ideologies. If he is not, he is bashed or not accepted. Just for example, there is a show called Namak whose hero is not much good looking. But he is the hero and also a debut. Do you know how much he was bashed in the show related topics? Many compared him to animal's face. He is getting lash outs since the promo launch. They didn't even know about his performance though. See I need to make you understand that looks play important role in this thing according to viewers.

I am not that immature to categorize actors by looks. Maybe some of my words are misquoted by me or mistook by you. See, Why don't the makers give Mohit a better look and better dialogues if he is supposed to be the ML?

Secondly, if Naag-Naagins are supposed to end up together. There is no story to show further.

Ekta's supernatural shows are based on cross breeding two different species and two different animals.

I shall assume that you haven't seen a single franchise of Naagin. I have seen all the seasons. In season 2, two snakes of different clans are paired. In season 3 & 4, naagin and human end up together. So, in season 5, we can't witness a naag and naagin of same clan to end up together according to Ekta mata.

If the original concept is Naag-Naagins, they should have made Sharad as Naag and Mohit as Eagle in over night by quoting anything can happen in Ekta's show.

About mocking nature, yeah it is. That's why the show is a flop in terms of TRP. In season 3, a naagin consummate with demon. So, it's not new for naagin viewers. I am not a ardent fan of Naagin 5 but I am a fan of the franchise.

@Blue- Dude, I think YOU ARE THE ONE MAKING A BIG BLUNDER BY HYPING THE NEGATIVE QUALITIES OF AN EK SHOW

Keep explaining whatever you want but that will not CHANGE THE FACT that EK has done a role-reversal plus COPIED THE ORIGINAL CONCEPT from another show as @Juhi has pointed out!

You are calling yourself MATURE, believe me you are immature!

The way you are reasoning out why VEER or SHARAD is the ML of this show, very well shows THAT!

Plus, you are HYPING THE NEGATIVISM of EK and her SO CALLED CRAP, by saying that my POV is a blunder while YOU ARE THE ONE WHO IS MAKING THE BIGGEST BLUNDER, with your SO CALLED REASONS HERE!

Finally, though you are CONSTANTLY SAYING YOU NEVER JUDGED MOHIT BY HIS LOOKS, BUT SORRY TO SAY YOU ARE OBVIOUSLY DOING IT WITH YOUR ARGUMENTS @Juhi rightly pointed out!

Plus you even called another actor as NOT GOOD LOOKING,

At least there you can see though critized by several over her choice of ML in terms of his looks, Gul never changed her cast nor her plot or did any role reversal, sadly EK has done it and that is main reason of the Naagin 5 plot change!

And I also know how Sharad/Veer fans SAID THE SAME KIND OF STUFF about Mohit in SOCIAL MEDIA!

You are again and again saying ARTICLES can be wrong!

My apologies, your PERSPECTIVES ARE WRONG!

Leave it, these things won't come to your understanding, because it clearly shows that you are turning blind to THE NEGATIVISM PLAYED BY THE PHs!

Anyways, good luck with watching Naagin 5, again as I said I don't watch it so I don't care who is with who in the show!

Originally posted by: Aleyamma47

@Blue- Dude, I think YOU ARE THE ONE MAKING A BIG BLUNDER BY HYPING THE NEGATIVE QUALITIES OF AN EK SHOW

Keep explaining whatever you want but that will not CHANGE THE FACT that EK has done a role-reversal plus COPIED THE ORIGINAL CONCEPT from another show as @Juhi has pointed out!

You are calling yourself MATURE, believe me you are immature!

The way you are reasoning out why VEER or SHARAD is the ML of this show, very well shows THAT!

Plus, you are HYPING THE NEGATIVISM of EK and her SO CALLED CRAP, by saying that my POV is a blunder while YOU ARE THE ONE WHO IS MAKING THE BIGGEST BLUNDER, with your SO CALLED REASONS HERE!

Finally, though you are CONSTANTLY SAYING YOU NEVER JUDGED MOHIT BY HIS LOOKS, BUT SORRY TO SAY YOU ARE OBVIOUSLY DOING IT WITH YOUR ARGUMENTS @Juhi rightly pointed out!

Plus you even called another actor as NOT GOOD LOOKING,

At least there you can see though critized by several over her choice of ML in terms of his looks, Gul never changed her cast nor her plot or did any role reversal, sadly EK has done it and that is main reason of the Naagin 5 plot change!

And I also know how Sharad/Veer fans SAID THE SAME KIND OF STUFF about Mohit in SOCIAL MEDIA!

You are again and again, saying ARTICLES can be wrong!

My apologies, your PERSPECTIVES ARE WRONG!

Leave it, these things won't come to your understanding, because it clearly shows that you are turning blind to THE NEGATIVISM PLAYED BY THE PHs!

Anyways, good luck with watching Naagin 5, again as I said I don't watch it so I don't care who is with who in the show!

black - I am just trying to explain that I am not mocking or judging the actor's looks, but if you take this as a point to degrade/bully someone who object your views for something constantly, Then it is up to you. You're saying about the articles, right? Where is it ? You are mocking my perspectives for the hidden and non-existed article. At the same time, you're saying that the concept is copied from ZEE5 show. So, what are you coming to say? Has she reversed the roles or copied the concept? I don't want answers anyways. If you stand strong by your words nevertheless it is worth or not, I too can defend my words.

What I say is, Mohit deserves a proper look like his previous shows unlike this one.

I'll make it clear that I am defending only my words on looks and the concept of the show and not the further.

About the hyping, I never ever said that Ekta has made a right job. What she did was a blunder. The funniest thing here is, you are saying that Ekta committed the blunder sometime later, but I am saying that Ekta opened the show with a blunder. That is the difference. I am not supporting what she did, I know the shows are imaginary and based on fantasy, so I am watching this for a time-pass that too in weekends to forget the work-stress. I don't have knowledge on other Ekta's shows, but I am confident with the infos about Naagin. So I am putting my points on it. I am not defending Ekta.

Violet - I have. He is a normal looking guy. I didn't abuse or bash him nor spoke about his skills. You and the other are the one who bring this.