Originally posted by: Kinginthenorth9
My point is that it extremely unfair to other contestants if one person keeps on being saved just due to his association with the most popular contestant.
Why can’t people vote for Abhi based on merit rather than based on who he’s associated?
And my criticism isn’t specific to Rubynav I criticize this thing every season.This sort of thing has been happening for the past few seasons. Puneesh was taken to the finale because of his association with Shilpa and Paras reached the finale due to support from Sid’s fanbase but at least Paras provided a lot of content rather than only eating fruits lol
My point being it’s unfair that content giving contestants are evicted over someone only interested in eating fruits just because of his association with the most popular housemate. It’s unfair to other housemates and it’s unfair to the viewers.
And I thought Ruby was strong enough to compete on her own and did not need a support system so why keep on voting for Abhi on non merit basis then?
Let her play alone she’ll be fine without Abhi cuz you guys yourself say she doesn’t need anyone’s support 😂😂
You have option to vote as we do, you can vote for whoever you want, just because Abhinav is not worthy for you doesn't mean he is not worthy for people who are voting for him.
If you want you can save your favorite, how is it unfair that people are giving their time to vote the person they want to save, just because you don't like him?