Originally posted by: nikki.171
True. He was shown as this calculative guy in the beginning and now he's just... there. Like the cheels. Forget AdiNaagin, he isnt even doing anything about Chandrakala. Phuski bomb. Honestly, I dont even think they needed a fake or real Markaat with him in the picture. He could have created the conflict in the stoey itself. But this is the same as the case of Andy Sehgal from Naagin3. They introduced him as "Shaitaani" and he turned out to be a bystander and a victim who just dies. 🤷♀️ i had higher hopes from Balwant considering there was no saas in the picture. But yeh armaan bhi gaya.
I also still wanna know why he locked the woman up and how he kept her caged for so long. Veer finding out about the cheels' illegal businesses, Noor getting justice, Teer's truth, what exactly happened the day Jay was pushed off the clif, Jay being properly punished, Bani's parents' murder out in the open, Veer's CheelRaajnes and so many other things. There are a lot of loose ends. But at this point I feel like this all gonna be swept under the rug and forgotten. Wishful thinking that they prove me wrong.
Red@Exactly! He would have created havoc himself. But they are showing the mother-in-law as the vamp again! This is so repetitive! In all the five seasons, the mothers of the heroes played the roles of negative characters!
Purple@Noor's murderer got killed. But I definitely want to know about Teer. Why was he locked up in a room? How did Shukla convince him to kill Jay? What did he say to him? Yes, Veeranshu should know about the human trafficking business.