Sleet of Emotional Quivers on RadhaKrishn Eternal Love CC # 9 - Page 91

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

..

Ok don't kill me for this, but I had sarcastically tweeted that RK might actually have Radha suggesting Krishna to help Draupadi n She might accompany to Kurukshetra.

And the creative head of RK liked my post. Both these things were later shown too

@Bold - LOL that person didn't get the sarcasm? 😂

Originally posted by: Wistfulness

Being the villain's accomplice will do more harm than good. Moreover, the reason that fuels her desire for revenge is another major factor that worsens her character because it's for a deceased villain whose ill deeds caused the destruction.

I agree. I would have liked the opposite if shown

Like had they shown Samb having abducted Lakshmana n forced marriage maybe due to the request of Duryodhan before Mahabharatha n later after the war she thinks that Yadavs took away her happiness a chance of a loving marriage and now is the cause of the death of her entire family, so she decides to somehow honeytrap Samb n then plan the farticide.

This angle could have been shown from Lakshmana's POV, but obviously makers will never be that kind

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Exactly why is milan between them needed

When exactly were there not together

Anyhow I am happy that the show is finally ending.

Hopefully Swastik never comes up with any other Historical/mythology shows

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

For a change I will like this distortion, Lakshmana was never given justice, at least this will show her getting some avenge

If they'd shown it as revenge for her rape, I could've understood to some extent.

But they're showing no rape. Moreover, she is doing this as revenge for her father who himself was part of the gang which sexually assaulted another woman.

Originally posted by: Wistfulness

Even I had joked about it. How else could they shove Radha? 😅

@Bold - LOL that person didn't get the sarcasm? 😂

Don't tell me I was shocked to see him liking my post

I was like is he so ignorant or is it that he has decided to put down his papers

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

If they'd shown it as revenge for her rape, I could've understood to some extent.

But they're showing no rape. Moreover, she is doing this as revenge for her father who himself was part of the gang which sexually assaulted another woman.

Yes I agree. Thankfully they stopped here

KP n me were discussing that they might also show Suthanu n have Suthanu failing all Lakshmana's plans just like today's soap operas

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

It is in Shishupala vadha parva. I posted the quote a couple of pages back.

This is again another piece of evidence that Krishna did try to get Jarasandha out on his own. It just wasn't possible because 1) Yadavas wouldn't cooperate and 2) Kuru Panchalas were needed as they were the only ones thought to have the right to the imperial throne.

Then, Panchali swayamvara happens specifically to build that alliance.

Ok thankyou so much

Although I still slightly disagree with the second point since Vasudev wouldn't have started the Ashwamedh had this been the rule. Plus to be honest I think Yadavs were not that powerful

However that aside, if actually Rukmavati n Rukmini are same then did Jarasandh try Shishupal marry Rukmavati? Possible but then this needs to happen at least 13 years after Dwarika establishment

Off topic did you guys ever read Srikant Taligiri ji?

Although not a Historian, yet he gives great details from Vedas n strongly supports out of India Theory

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

Poor Lakshmana. Raped literally by Samba in reality. Metaphorically so by the show with her character being turned into that of a vengeful mass murderer.

I could've laughed off what they did to Krishna.

But why this to a rape victim who was forced to marry the criminal asaaulter?

Abduction for marriage was deemed honorable those days

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

.

Ok thankyou so much

Although I still slightly disagree with the second point since Vasudev wouldn't have started the Ashwamedh had this been the rule. Plus to be honest I think Yadavs were not that powerful

However that aside, if actually Rukmavati n Rukmini are same then did Jarasandh try Shishupal marry Rukmavati? Possible but then this needs to happen at least 13 years after Dwarika establishment

Off topic did you guys ever read Srikant Taligiri ji?

Although not a Historian, yet he gives great details from Vedas n strongly supports out of India Theory

There was no rule. It was just understood that Kuru Panchalas were the elite of all of them.

It actually is stated so in Karna Shalya Samvadha.

Yadavas tried to oust Jarasandha with the Yagya, but it didn't work.

Therefore, the alliance.

Between establishment of Dwaraka and Panchali swayamvara, there would have been 6 or 7 years at least. If Shishupala was born right after, it would be 10 plus years after Panchali swayamvara before he could do any swayamvara. IIRC, he is actually NOT mentioned in CE at Panchali event. Why wouldn't he be there if he were the king of Chedi?

4 or 5 years after swayamvara, Arjuna would kidnap Subhadra. Shishupala would've been 15 ish by then An year or so later, he came of age and was brought up to be Jarasandha's goon.

This would be the time Rukmini/Rukmavati also turned 16 since generally grooms are older. Pradyumna kidnapped her with Krishna's help.

Jambavati and Satyabhama are specifically stated to be married to Krishna by lac house.

So either Rukmini didn't exist, or she was one fo Krishna's junior wives..

It is the only way to make sense of the Rukmini timeline and Shishupala chronology.

Originally posted by: vyapti

Abduction for marriage was deemed honorable those days

Samba wasn't trying to marry her. He simply raped her. Duryodhana imprisoned Samba. Balram came with army, and elders negotiated marriage.

Also, honorable for whom? The men, perhaps. I don't imagine a woman raped would be comforted by that.