Not sure you understood my context? Nisha nominated Aajeedh during the elimination topple. So I didn't see an individual gameplay with what he did in there by voting to support Anitha and then Sanam later. If anything it solidified he is playing to support his friends. About no groupism gang, their behaviour is well known - there is no denying that. But doesn't mean Bala plays individually either.
Whether Bala gang nominates the same person or not doesn't make a difference. By now all in the house know that if they make 2 votes for a person they will come into nomination. Each one of them just have to split their vote in a way that one contestant gets 2 votes - it's a simple math game.
Maintaining friendship with ppl is very important for this game. I believe that Balaji is trying to make friendship with individual ppl rather than just focusing/playing as a group instead of himself.
No groupism group play as a group and makes enemy with one if that person did something against their one member of their team.
Bala and his friends never does that. They have individual thinking. Aajeedh and Gaby have good relationship even though Bala didn't have that rapport with Gaby. Bala have good rapport with Anita eventhough his friends doesn't have good rapport with Anita.
I am just pointing out making groups are not wrong as long as whole group doesn't tries to show partiality.