Originally posted by: goldiesif
If I remember correctly, everyone was randomly saying ok for best performer on which ever name popped up, without any restrictions to vote how many ever contestants they want to choose. This is how initial filtering happened with who ever got more than 4 votes and then after that each HM got one vote each in second round of voting.
So it isn't like someone with no vote went for second round, now this process can be questioned on who determines this rules. Two things, if any HM doesn't like rules he has to do two things, raise then and there and not after gone into disadvantage state. Second, propose a alternative.
Actually process can be simple and can be followed every single time voting required and it can be like every HM get as many votes to select as many contestants need to be selected. No discussion what so ever, just count it.
Now after the process is fair, still someone undeservingly got best/worst out of the process, so be it. Aren't we used to it đ? That is game. Kind of groupism which Gayathri did is what I would consider mean.
If someone is talking too much against groupism, they got to be really careful also - their actions will be scrutinized even more and they will be in constant pressure to be fair throughout - which isn't easy thing to do in this game.
Those who talked against groupism before is part of group to an extent now đ
I have to rewatch but I remember the 4 counts was stated when all the names were said randomly...now when each states a name without a proper count how will you know one got 4 votes...Ramya or Sam said I didnât get 4 votes but stayed in front...so no proper process...they couldnât event justify when Kamal asked who voted for who and the reason.....and when you are the only person versus a group itâs not always easy to interrupt and say your process is wrong every single time.
The point here is not about being in group is wrong...you need companionship and nothing wrong to be with ppl you like...however in a game show like this it should not affect your decision making...that is what Aari points out....they donât take names of certain ppl because they like that person or they are close to that person...make someone else as a scapegoat because that person is not popular among the group....The ethical value put in question here is â fairnessâ under groupism and favoritisms.