Members Only - Sushant Singh Rajput Case Discussion Thread #11 - Page 67

Now Arnab come with some audio tap of Hasrath case ..one congress man saying his media friendly from media houses ll be there to cover pappu, sis 🤣🤪

😵

https://twitter.com/Spotboye/status/1312031152945811456?s=19

Originally posted by: RitRitzz

https://twitter.com/themikumishra/status/1312012729666818054?s=19

https://twitter.com/arnabofficial9/status/1312026424132370439?s=19

😲😲

I watched the Times Now interview and Neeraj is sticking to his same story. He said that no one came to destroy any hard disks or visited between June 8 and June 13, and SSR did not leave the house on June 13. He talked about seeing the body. He did say that Showik and Miranda obtained drugs, but I didn't hear him say anything about them giving SSR drugs without his knowledge. Not sure why this would be such big news or why it is being presented as "big trouble" for Rhea and team...? Am I missing something?

Thanks to Republic for keep pursuing Ssr's case, the other case needs attention too but not at the cost of no reporting of Ssr's case at all.

Originally posted by: HZAnita

I watched the Times Now interview and Neeraj is sticking to his same story. He said that no one came to destroy any hard disks or visited between June 8 and June 13, and SSR did not leave the house on June 13. He talked about seeing the body. He did say that Showik and Miranda obtained drugs, but I didn't hear him say anything about them giving SSR drugs without his knowledge. Not sure why this would be such big news or why it is being presented as "big trouble" for Rhea and team...? Am I missing something?

big trouble because according to Republic they confessed of Ssr's being given drugs without his knowledge, previously it was said that they procured drugs for him (though that might be a fake twitter acct of arnab)

Btw wasnt Shruthi modi was the one who first told ED about him being given drugs without his knowledge. I remember reading about that long time back.

Originally posted by: Lalakhun1

big trouble because according to Republic they confessed of Ssr's being given drugs without his knowledge, previously it was said that they procured drugs for him (though that might be a fake twitter acct of arnab)

Btw wasnt Shruthi modi was the one who first told ED about him being given drugs without his knowledge. I remember reading about that long time back.

I don't know about Shruti Modi, but I am still confused about the tweet. In the tweet, they had screen caps of the video below and implied that Neeraj confessed to SSR being given drugs without his consent, but Neeraj never said that. Neeraj is just reiterating his same story about finding the body and the events between June 8 and June 13. The only thing he revealed of note was that it was Miranda and Showik who used to procure the drugs for SSR. Is there some other interview/confession they are talking about?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgqqjHNSFf8

Originally posted by: HZAnita

I watched the Times Now interview and Neeraj is sticking to his same story. He said that no one came to destroy any hard disks or visited between June 8 and June 13, and SSR did not leave the house on June 13. He talked about seeing the body. He did say that Showik and Miranda obtained drugs, but I didn't hear him say anything about them giving SSR drugs without his knowledge. Not sure why this would be such big news or why it is being presented as "big trouble" for Rhea and team...? Am I missing something?

Around here in the USA, if you drug someone without their consent you are responsible for everything they do after the drugging, far more than they are. It does not matter if they commit suicide or rape someone you are more responsible than they are. I remember, reading and discussing a criminal case, where one person whose drink got spiked ends up molesting a minor boy. The person who drugged him was held more accountable than he was. BUT that being said I dont think Sushant committed suicide even after being drugged. He was most def murdered. Also he was never suffering from depression. They were drugging him (if this is true) to convince him there is something wrong with him. So they could take him to these five doctors Manshinde keeps talking about, and get him inaccurately diagnosed with either bipolar or manic depression. Really all it was seems to side effects of multiple drugs mixed together both prescribed and banned (which is terrible for you) and withdrawal symptoms from other drugs.

Also, if the news about Sushant being drugged without his consent is true, than Shraddha and Sara def know about it. It is why they were told to say Sushant use to take drugs in the vanity van. It was a conspiracy of all of bollywood to save Rhea and whoever planted her in Sushant's life. I get that she might have been a rebound. But how did he even consider her rebound material?

Originally posted by: grumpydwarf

Around here in the USA, if you drug someone without their consent you are responsible for everything they do after the drugging, far more than they are. It does not matter if they commit suicide or rape someone you are more responsible than they are. I remember, reading and discussing a criminal case, where one person whose drink got spiked ends up molesting a minor boy. The person who drugged him was held more accountable than he was. BUT that being said I dont think Sushant committed suicide even after being drugged. He was most def murdered. Also he was never suffering from depression. They were drugging him (if this is true) to convince him there is something wrong with him. So they could take him to these five doctors Manshinde keeps talking about, and get him inaccurately diagnosed with either bipolar or manic depression. Really all it was seems to side effects of multiple drugs mixed together both prescribed and banned (which is terrible for you) and withdrawal symptoms from other drugs.

I totally agree with your points. I was just saying that nowhere in that interview did Neeraj say that Sushant was taking drugs without his knowledge or consent, so I didn't understand why this particular interview is being touted as proof of anything...?