#justiceforHrithik - Page 3

Originally posted by: bollywoodbuff20

Ok so imagine this .kangana meets rithik at karan johars party and tells him she has been communicating with him over emails since last 2 years. He says oh no thats not me, thats somebody else but here u go, here is my correct email id. Pls send all ur crap to me. Kangana goes wow i have been communicating with an imposter all along WTF but who cares now i have the correc email id hurrayy ..let me send a thousand emails + nudes to rithik's correct email id now.

Meanwhile Karan Johar is standing there wondering who da hell wrote this script 😆

Rithwiks story didn't make any sense to me when i first read it and it still doesnt make any sense to me tbh.

The fact remains that he was divorced around this same time from someone he had said this about "if u think nobody is perfect then meet my wife suzanne" ..there were crazy rumours at the time i don't wish to repeat here az rithik bhakts will gang up on me

like i said earlier the truth is prob somewhere in the middle and both parties most likely settled. Assuming that's the case kangana has been mischievous bringing up rithik at every chance she gets

didnt rithwik completely deny that he received any emails from kangana and that she had communicating with an "impostor"? how could he have known then

And yet

Rithwiks story didn't make any sense to me when i first read it and it still doesnt make any sense to me tbh.

Yeah, you're trolling

If all of what Kangana says was just a figment of her imagination with no leg to stand on, why wasn't Hrithik able to bust her? Why was there no definite conclusion and why did it split people in two sides? If it was all Kangana's creative juices at work, surely it would have been very easy for Hrithik to disprove Kangna's claims? How come he wasn't able to? Some food for thought.

To me, her perspective on the entire saga makes more sense than Hrithik flying off his handle over the silly ex reference and then the pin drop silence afterwards. Let's also not forget that many married men in bollywood try to maintain their "brand" while have a string of affairs with unsuspecting women ..... who's to say that Hrithik is an exception to that case? His wife even divorced him, so obviously he didn't have a hunky dory marriage and that reinforces the possibility that he sought the love drug through his affairs.

So Hrithik did not have a brain surgery during Bang Bang ..It was a cocaine overdose .Shocking!

Originally posted by: bollywoodbuff20

didnt rithwik completely deny that he received any emails from kangana and that she had communicating with an "impostor"? how could he have known then

think i read somewhere that rithwik said rangoli told him that kangana has Aspergers..

No Kangana mailed Hrithik only he shown all mails but then it was said its not his ac Kangu baby said her Email account was hack police about to verify but she did not handover her laptop,,,,

Originally posted by: coldbrew

If all of what Kangana says was just a figment of her imagination with no leg to stand on, why wasn't Hrithik able to bust her? Why was there no definite conclusion and why did it split people in two sides? If it was all Kangana's creative juices at work, surely it would have been very easy for Hrithik to disprove Kangna's claims? How come he wasn't able to? Some food for thought.

To me, her perspective on the entire saga makes more sense than Hrithik flying off his handle over the silly ex reference and then the pin drop silence afterwards. Let's also not forget that many married men in bollywood try to maintain their "brand" while have a string of affairs with unsuspecting women ..... who's to say that Hrithik is an exception to that case? His wife even divorced him, so obviously he didn't have a hunky dory marriage and that reinforces the possibility that he sought the love drug through his affairs.

If It reallt was a years long affair you tell me why hasn’t been kangana Able to provide a singleness shred of solid evidence of their relationship?

Some food for thought.

Originally posted by: coldbrew

If all of what Kangana says was just a figment of her imagination with no leg to stand on, why wasn't Hrithik able to bust her? Why was there no definite conclusion and why did it split people in two sides? If it was all Kangana's creative juices at work, surely it would have been very easy for Hrithik to disprove Kangna's claims? How come he wasn't able to? Some food for thought.

To me, her perspective on the entire saga makes more sense than Hrithik flying off his handle over the silly ex reference and then the pin drop silence afterwards. Let's also not forget that many married men in bollywood try to maintain their "brand" while have a string of affairs with unsuspecting women ..... who's to say that Hrithik is an exception to that case? His wife even divorced him, so obviously he didn't have a hunky dory marriage and that reinforces the possibility that he sought the love drug through his affairs.

Her own released e-mails say it never happened except in her phantasy. Never touched, never kissed, never had sex, never dated. She could barely speak to him even when working together. In her mind they were together but they weren't. In her own words (in interviews), she's been obsessed since she was 14 and crossed mountains, desserts and oceans (there's an ocean in India?) to be with him. All that done without him knowing she was alive. She needed no personal incentive by him to be obsessed. She's still obsessed.

Bottom line, he provided evidence to Cyber Crime to back up his claims, she destroyed evidence (her phone and computer) and provided none to back up her claims. Her only presented proof of her claimed 7 year relationship was a photo-shopped pic at a cast party. Her get of jail card is that there is no law against a woman stalking/ harassing a man in India. The law is only for women being harassed/stalked by men.

But it's been said countless times in great detail and you've replied that you didn't want to hear it again because you've heard it all before. So why ask again? And why am I wasting my time? 😕

This is a news article from 2014 (two year before kangana calendar out with her imaginative tales)

Where hrithik filed a report with police about someone pretending to be him interacting with other people. This is right after when (like he says) kanganas met him at a party ans mentioned her getting emails from him.

He corrected her at that karan party that it wasn’t him and contacted police as well..: anyone can check the date on the news paper. It’s from 2014

Hrithik approaches police over fake email account

Actor Hrithik Roshan complained to the Mumbai police commissioner on Friday after discovering someone had allegedly created a fake email account in his name.

Updated: Dec 13, 2014 16:00 IST

Actor Hrithik Roshan complained to the Mumbai police commissioner on Friday after discovering someone had allegedly created a fake email account in his name.

The 40-year-old actor was worried when he was told a girl sent some objectionable photographs to the fake email account presuming it was his account.

Roshan, in a letter to commissioner to Rakesh Maria and the BKC cyber crime division, alleged a person is in contact with his friends and fans using a fake email address (email removed). Roshan found out about the fake account when he began receiving calls from his friends asking why he was not replying to their emails.

The impersonator is allegedly communicating with Roshan’s fans and people from the film industry pretending to be Roshan.

In the letter, Roshan has written, ‘It is a well-known fact that many a times young girls and boys send their provocative and/or nude pictures and film clips to film personalities in the vain hope it could bring them some work. I am given to understand (sic) that a young girl has sent a lot of such photographs and film clips on the email address (email removed) thinking that she is sending it to me.’ Roshan also mentioned that if the said material is used wrongly, it can ruin his reputation and the girl completely.

Confirming the complaint, Dipesh Mehta, Roshan’s advocate told HT, “The complaint has been filed. We are meeting the commissioner next week to decide on further course of action

I still remember mejority forum members were favoring Kangana when she started this non existing love angle. We all used to trash Hritik when Kangu used to narrate her imaginary dating tales in Paris. Time flies. It's been long journey with her fake relationship stories. Most of us stopped supporting her after those Emails were out.

Hritik deserves appreciation for dealing with both pathetic sisters with grace. They tried to drag his kids/father/ex wife in this, but still there was patience from his side. Not saying he is some saint, but he truly deserves justice, and kangoli deserve to rot in jail.

Originally posted by: Elvis12

So Hrithik did not have a brain surgery during Bang Bang ..It was a cocaine overdose .Shocking!

No, he had brain surgery in 2013, then suffered complications from the blood clot and surgery for 7 months. Got divorced, completed Bang Bang wearing ear plugs and was stalked/harassed starting in 2014. He had a really bad couple of years.

Originally posted by: Justwatching

If It reallt was a years long affair you tell me why hasn’t been kangana Able to provide a singleness shred of solid evidence of their relationship?

Some food for thought.

Cuz it was a clandestine affair--naturally Hrithik was careful--it was neither the first time nor the last time he was engaging in an extramarital affair--he must have had the know-how on how to get away with it ... without leaving anything incriminating that could come back to haunt him. Do you think he's dumb? LOL

He didn't leave a trail of pictures or videos cuz he never wanted it to go public. Arguments can be made from both sides but for all the claims that Kangna "imagined" it all, no one has been able to counter her with anything solid. So anyone can pull long elaborated stories out of their rear and even a full-fledged legal case can't disprove it? 😆 What does that say to you about Hrithik's supposed innocence?