Originally posted by: Pain-in-ur-Neck
Why are you bringing the girls in here when our posts more or less were rebuttals against your first post of equating make up clad guys to females?! (No one said anything against anyone having a preference)!
So don't even try to be that saas putting phut in their bahus! 😆
And there's no mountain of the molehill here, simply a discussion. Agar aise discussion se RegressiveThug can become ProgressiveThug why the heck not! 🤣
@Bold - Yes everyone's viewpoint is different but that doesn't mean progressiveness is a matter of subjectivity! Agar aisa hota toh we would have been still stuck in the stone age. You can't dodge the bullet of regressive attitude with subjectivity - Esp not when our society is so heavy laden on judgements and prejudice!
And yes I am BACK with my 15 posts - Dekhte hain how hungry you are today! 😆😆
Khud ke replies check karo against Ennuyi and Billi when they were saying "not into those types of guys", you wrote a whole bunch of essays😂 , making it about something which it wasn't about.
Abhi unko kiyu leave karu mai un dono ko?😂
Aur rahi baat meri progressive hone ki, than sorry if being progressive means I can't even point out people's appearances than nahi hona progressives. 😂
Asking someone, what they think about Korean pop stars who try hard to beautify themselves like females do, is somehow filled with the so-called homophobic and gender appropriation connotation, than well I can sorry I cant ne politically correct.
Also I asked about Koreans pop stars, because we were discussing Koreans. it isn't like I am unaware of male beautification going on in BW or with the tik tok generation of India.
And no progressiveness is as subjective as anything. And when I replied to EXOL with "make up doesn't make them progressive", I wasn't criticizing make up on boys, I was saying, make up isn't a symbol of progressiveness.
12