Originally posted by: deepikagupta9
I m also asking why should they protect .
Did anyone came to help him or assist him ?
He himself searched 4 ways 4 his problems .
Can u tell me where it is written parshuram took responsibility f whole human race , he will protect them or guide them . I don't think parshuram took any oath of protecting human race & making things correct 4 them .
It was indian kings responsibility to protect their subjects not parshuram
I m sorry u r blaming parshuram of something which he is not responsible then why should he protect . Parshuram to dwapar main bhi the still he dint do anything in dwapar 2 stop mahabharat neither he participated .
Now blame him 4 draupadi insult also .
Sabko bachane ki kasam nhi khayi parshuram .
Ghandhari blamed krishna was entire thing without realising her own sons were wrong not krishna .
Krishna was not responsible 4 pandav kaursv rivalry , why should he mend ways 4 them .
Krishna was not responsible 4 war , without any reason got blamed & cursed.
When krishna was not responsible why should he mend things 4 others.
Ur blame on parshuram is point less .
Parshuram dint hided , he retired from wordly duties after ram & Krishna avtar.
Sab kaam parshuram karenge to baaki ki kya karenge.
Ganga requested him to teach devrat / bheesam . Parshuram was not against kshatriya caste but was against who mis use their power .
Parshuram only teach brahman, that's why he was angry on karn & cursed him coz karn lied.
We can agree to disagree
I am not blaming them of anything, rather proving that they aren't/weren't present. I am simply saying that anyone just anyone who is capable to save an innocent from brutal torture would go and save him/her, irrespective of whether or not it's their duty.
Any normal human would get traumatized by seeing the conditions and hearing the pleas and would try to help within their capacity
No one helped him because no one was capable to do so, but that isn't the case with Parashuram/Kripacharya, they were capable to help yet they didn't.
If he broke his oath for teaching Bheeshma, he could break it for common people in India too. Do you think they wouldn't have prayed to him/requested him?
If Parashuram was approachable by humans in Dwapar Yug, although even that wasn't his Yuga, why did he hide himself in Kaliyug?? At a time his guidance was needed the most. What couldn't he become approachable to at least guide people?
And each of these points are valid for Kripacharya as well
That they didn't do anything among these is a proof big enough that they aren't alive at all.
Aside in no way it's possible that Parashuram of Mahabharata was the same as Parashuram of Ramayana and the a Parashuram of Satyug who made Dharti Kshatriya viheen.
Many things in Mahabharatha are completely impossible.
Do you really think that Bheeshm's mother was a river? Is that possible anyway? Can a river take human form marry a king, have kids? And when she did so was the river completely dry? Because she would have been in Shantanu's palace right?
Do you really think that Takshak, Kalikeya etc. Nagas were snakes with multiple heads?
Do you really think, Sun who is like thousand times greater than earth came to Kunti to just impregnate her? Could Karna really be born with Kawatch Kundal? Forget other things, Kunti would have died during childbirth had the child coming out have metals surrounding him?
Anyhow if you really want to believe what is written in a poem/ poetic book over laws of physics and nature, over what/what can't happen then it's your belief, but that isn't possible at all, neither is there any proof of it.
You are right we must end this discussion there couldn't be one between belief n logic. Let's agree to disagree. Peace out
Sorry if I ever sounded rude
Edited by FlauntPessimism - 5 years ago
CID
