Mahabharat Retelecast Discussion Thread 6 - Page 92

Created

Last reply

Replies

1.1k

Views

33.7k

Users

17

Likes

1.1k

Frequent Posters

Fruitcustard_9 thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: Andy3456


Bold : I too read the same that in a village near Himalayan foothills, they follow Polyandry because they believe in One house, One kitchen, One bride formula to maintain unity.


In some himachal pradesh villages these kind of rituals r stricly followed

AninditaB thumbnail
5th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: Armu4eva

But didn't people here post that Drau maternal side was rich and the Pandav actually lived off her for quite some time and even built Indraprastha from it?


Yeah they got a heavy dowry and even Krishna gifted them heavily.

FlauntPessimism thumbnail
Screen Detective Participant Thumbnail ICC T20 CWC 2024 Match Winner Thumbnail + 9
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

Upandavas were incarnation of vishwadevas , who were destinated to die unmarried , this is divinity angle .


Maybe unka bhi kuch age limited angle ho , like chandra"s son varchas as Abhimanyu had time limit of 16 yrs.

Ancient Indian family lineages ka list tha usme Uppandavas k bachhon ka bhi naam tha

FlauntPessimism thumbnail
Screen Detective Participant Thumbnail ICC T20 CWC 2024 Match Winner Thumbnail + 9
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: naq5

well if it was her decicion then it was actually more of a test for the brothers to be able to stay together. wouldnt her choosing one over another create more fights between them .if the purpose of draupadi married to all 5 was to keep brothers together.

makes me wonder if they actually shared draupadi because it was more feasible. i read an article where it was mentioned that in a village brothers shared wifes because that would make a lesser person to feed. And the pandavas dint have anything with them so it was more feasible financially

I think they had given her the rights. She would simply approach the husband she wanted (just like husbands do in case of Polygyny) in her case, it was her duty to ensure that none of the husbands felt sidelined

Armu4eva thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

Subhadra's lineage was destinated to carry forward Pandavas linage , it suffered nearby death . Krishna dint favoured subhadra . If he was biased then he would have saved Abhimanyu which he dint saved coz he was destinated 2 die.


I said it's destiny rule , nothing comes 4 free who have to pay d cost & god can't change anyone destiny as he 2 suffer according to his destiny.


krishna 2 has no fault in all this still he got cursed & witness his entire clan destruction in front of his eyes .

I think the core teaching of Gita is to emphasize the importance of Karma and Dharma. So if it's all about destiny then the whole Gita becomes pointless.

And Krishna would obviously face consequences of waging such a dangerous war where several innocents also died.

I am not saying others didn't sacrifice but for all that Draupadi went thru, her bloodline should have been on the throne. I remember you don't like Draupadi so I think there is no point in us debating this further. Let's agree to disagree🤗

Armu4eva thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
Armu4eva thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
AninditaB thumbnail
5th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 5 years ago

Tbh ArDi is bit overhyped 😆.


Hiding from Mages' chappal

AninditaB thumbnail
5th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 5 years ago


Same here 😁. The fact that it happened 😂🤣 with me.

Fruitcustard_9 thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

I doubt he wouldn't have saved Abhimanyu if he could.


This Destiny thing is completely logic less even if you consider Divinity

That would mean Duryodhan was destined to be bad n cruel.

Chandal Chaukdi were destined to plan Lakshagriha


Bheem was destined to be poisoned.


In that case everyone were playing their role as per destiny then why should someone be punished


No dear it not logicless acc 2 divinity krishna was knowing Abhimanyu will not survive beyond 16 yrs ,


Acc 2 krishna actually knew everything


Bheem was 2 gain power of 1000 elephants , poison became instrumental in it .



If u remember once I asked u if we can delete dice hall & draupadi humiliation from MB , will this war happen . I guess war would had not happened without these incident.


I guess some one mentioned vyas alerting Yudi about d consequences of upcoming dice game , that's mean it was pre destinated that very big adharma will happen from Yudi's hand leading d way to big war.


How could vyas know Yudi will be d reason of big war .


I don't know why draupadi's humiliation was planned by destiny but it was definitely pre destinated Varna vyas would have not warned yudi


We can agree 2 disagree on it

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".