Originally posted by: Mugda
Tamil version is considered a masterpiece. Hindi version failed because of miscasting of Abhishek as Raavan. It was supposed to be SRK and Aishwarya but Mani later decided to cast Abhishek.
its a disaster in Tamil too because we felt like as in Ramayana even in Ravan they failed to say who and what like the real raavanan was!! This version is to say Raavan alone is not Raavan and even Raam shall be a raavan at times..if one ask ,had that point reached anyone's heart it's a big NO..why because the casts failed to impress us as the character..Vikram was fantastic but did that justified the role means it's a big NO..that's why casting is important. Iys not about being big on screen..
Look at the ponniyan sylvan casting
Aishwarya..really..can she ever fit the face of choza dynasty
Trisha...for what ..
Keerti sheesh.. omg! Always unfit
Aishwarya..for which role..
The cast should like the following
Vikram,Vijay( As Vandiyadevan),kartik, Parvathy Menon( poonguzhali), Nayantra and Anushka
Kamalhasan/Mohanlal in the role of jayaram..
This might do wonders..but who cares and who will listen...
Bahubali succeeded more as it had a apt casting..Manirathnam always gets fascinated by this upper class faces which is why he is failing deeply down with the general audiences...Nothing to say!!
2