Originally posted by: nushy1995
See, at the end of the day, the HAQ or RIGHT - it's very natural. The problem is the borderline abuse that is mostly highlighted in a lot of shows. The clip I shared with you, it's another thing that Anjali was specifically planted to catch Badal and Suman. But at the beginning Suman didn't know it. The way she reacted, wouldn't we roast a ML if he did the same thing? Because ultimately your spouse would meet new people and interact with them. Ultimately, it's about how we keep our urges in control and behave. Because Pallavi did ask Suman - Anjali ko choro, kya tumhe Badal pe bharosa nahi hain?
Coming to my problem with this particular couple is that here we are dealing with a 8 years old kid and a young man who is in his early twenties. Yes, the story is set in 1920 and they are married. But the guy looks at her as a kid and is trying his best to support her. When you are teaching a kid, wouldn't you show authority? Because you are teaching him/her. So how is it suddenly getting translated in HAQ? Plus Ani as a person is short tempered and is a bit bratty in a sense that he feels ultimately everybody will listen and agree to his words. He did the same mistake with Mini too as he just expected Mini to share the same dream when she in fact had other plans.
10 years from now, Bondita will be a grown, educated woman and will have her voice. Ani will learn from his experience and let go off his kiddish behavior. At that point if they decide to stay together and fulfill their relation then I would understand the HAQ thing. But from which angle HAQ is being exercised now? At least I am failing to see it. 🤔
Agree completely with you...
Red: definitely... People would have roasted Badal if he would have reacted in the same way. After all, you do meet new people and interact with them... Agar aisa hi chalta raha then the ML and FL will never be able to interact with anyone except their partner...
Underlined: I second you...
Bold: exactly... They are dealing with an 8 year old kid and a young man in his early twenties. Right now, he is acting more as her mentor, supporting her and teaching her. Definitely a mentor or a teacher or in the sense, any senior who is teaching something to his/her junior will extract some kind of authority... How can this be labelled as 'haq' I don't understand...
Definitely... 10 years from now, if they fulfill their relation, I too will get the haq thing. But not now...not now when he is just mentoring her, helping and guiding her..
Music Corner
Current Affairs
Cricket
Anupamaa
