~| Whatever you want to argue about |~ - Page 109

Originally posted by: NoraSM

No

Subhadra - Draupadi conversation is about Arjuna, You see Draupadi said good things about Arjuna’a future, someone who was raped wouldn’t like hearing “May Your rapist have no enemies”

Subhadra doesn’t show hatred towards Arjuna which would have been there if she was raped, I cannot see a rape victim thinking good about someone who raped her.

Abduction for marriage is a non bailable offense so it is definitely not correct for someone to follow Arjuna and Krishna’s footsteps today

I don’t know about Subhadra’a age and when did she deliver Abhimanyu? The time isn’t specified

Now he was her husband, even today majority women accept the marital r**e by husbands as their fate and hold no wrong feelings for them, do you really think they had other believes at that time?

I said the small age because immidiately after Arjuna's exile Rajsuya started, and supposedly Subhadra was pregnant at the start of it

Again the four types of women responded to the situation as per their inherent nature.

Amba - naive and an idealist

Gandhari - manipulative and passive aggressive

Draupadi / Hidimba - assertive and opportunistic

Subhadra/ Uttara / Lakshmana / Bhanumati - submissive.

Before people jump to conclusions:

An opportunistic person is a positive person, who takes advantage of situations

A manipulative person is a negative person, who takes advantage of people.

Originally posted by: NoraSM

I'll stop the discussion on this here from my side because there's no point arguing over opinions, Abhimanyu can be son of Krishna and Subhadra or Son of Krishna and Draupadi too 🤣

Where did I say Abhimanyu was the son of Krishna and Panchali or even that he was Krishna's biological son?😕 I said a couple of times I believe it was because Krishna raised the boy.

When Abhimanyu is called Karshni with Krishna and Arjuna mentioned in the SAME sentence, THAT Krishna is Krishna-Govinda. The father-in-law part merely adds to the evidence.

Food for thought:

If younger Pandavas didn't dare disobey Yudhishtira no matter what, what was the need for polyandry?😈😆

Originally posted by: Chiillii

Again the four types of women responded to the situation as per their inherent nature.

Amba - naive and an idealist

Gandhari - manipulative and passive aggressive

Draupadi / Hidimba - assertive and opportunistic

Subhadra/ Uttara / Lakshmana / Bhanumati - submissive.

Before people jump to conclusions:

An opportunistic person is a positive person, who takes advantage of situations

A manipulative person is a negative person, who takes advantage of people.

@ chiilii

What r ur views on upandavas & Abhimanyu bring referred as krishna's son & heir by satayki

Originally posted by: NoraSM

Polygamy is a crime in India punishable up to 7 years in Prison, Sab jail me hote including Draupadi🤣

Slavery is a crime too, saari ladkiyab bhi jail me hoti

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

Food for thought:

If younger Pandavas didn't dare disobey Yudhishtira no matter what, what was the need for polyandry?😈😆

They would have done otherwise.

With agreeing to Polyandry, Yudhishtir just made all of them indebted to them (maybe he came by a statement main sab se Vivah karwaounga Draupadi ka, par fir tum sab ko mere har nirnay ka aankh moond k samarthan karna hoga) and so they never objected him later

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Now he was her husband, even today majority women accept the marital r**e by husbands as their fate and hold no wrong feelings for them, do you really think they had other believes at that time?

I said the small age because immidiately after Arjuna's exile Rajsuya started, and supposedly Subhadra was pregnant at the start of it

It is rape if there was no consent, if there’s no consent means there are wrong feelings. Is there anything to suggest that Arjuna forced himself on her?

Please read Subhadraharan part, It wasn’t a planned as abduction, Arjuna drove towards IP (he couldn’t go back before ending his exile), Krishna pacified Balaram and sent them after Arjuna, They brought Arjuna and Subhadra back home and they were married In Dwarka. The abduction wasn’t because of Subhadra’s consent, it was for Balaram and Yadav’s agreement

If Abduction was the norm for men then it was the norm for women as well, Krishna lists it as a method of legal marriage

They didn’t ask Subhadra before or after it, Krishna said he doesn’t know what she will do in her Swayamvara so Subhadra wasn’t someone who wouldn’t say anything, we had this discussion in the print article if you remember

She wasn’t submissive by nature

Abhi and Draupadi’s son from Arjuna were born before Khandavprasth burning, Subhadra was there with Draupadi, Krishna and Arjuna so she wasn’t pregnant at this point, Maya built the mahal in 14 months and went for search of manis to build it so there’s 3-4 months, Rajyasuya was suggested by Narada in Maya Palace

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Slavery is a crime too, saari ladkiyab bhi jail me hoti

Yes

There would be no war if there was a prison and IPC in that era

Originally posted by: NoraSM

Yes

There would be no war if there was a prison and IPC in that era

Jail me war hota fir