~| Whatever you want to argue about |~ - Page 102

Originally posted by: NoraSM

Abhimanyu being called Krishna's son doesn't mean Krishna was his biological father, he is called son of Arjuna and Subhadra more times and his birth is described in detail

In my opinion it has more to do with the alliance with Virat, Arjuna had nothing at that time, Krishna would have taken guarantee of Abhimanyu, Why would Virat marry his daughter to people who have nothing?

Look who we have here. Hi nora

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

That is during the 12 years exile thing. That's not a possibility in 13 months exile thing and 12 years exile seem improbable to me.

And even if its a year, Subhadra still was below 16 and consent/no consent is something we could never know

Consent 2 draupadi se bhi nhi liya gaya , still she is mentioned happy & cheerful.

Logically which woman we will want 2 marry 5 men , whatever is d reason .

Originally posted by: Lazybird_Silpa

latter additions?they took part in the war no

Yes they did. Maybe they were pandavas son with other wives who drapaudi adopted.

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

But the confusion is only on Prativindhya Sutsoma and Shrutkarma right? For other two it's clear

Nah for prativindhya its clear. Its yudhishtra mentioned everywhere. For satanika also its nakula. Its the younger three where different places different things.

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

If Abhimanyu was indeed Krishna's son, another soap opera question comes up.😆

Who's The Mommy?😈

I think i know who 😈

Originally posted by: Krishnapanchali

I think i know who 😈

Who😈

Originally posted by: Krishnapanchali

Nah for prativindhya its clear. Its yudhishtra mentioned everywhere. For satanika also its nakula. Its the younger three where different places different things.

No Prativindhya was left in Ekchakranagri from where Arjun brought him later.

But why would Prativindhya go to Ekchakranagri? Pandavas stayed there before Draupadi Swayamwar and Ekchakranagri wasn't a tourist spot to go there to play. So might be Prativindhya was there even before Draupadi Swayamwar

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

Consent 2 draupadi se bhi nhi liya gaya , still she is mentioned happy & cheerful.

Logically which woman we will want 2 marry 5 men , whatever is d reason .

@Bold this is against equality. When men could be happy to marry multiple women why can't women be happy in same condition?

Not sure whether or not Draupadi was happy at Polyandry, but she was an adult unlike Subhadra who was still a 15 year old

Originally posted by: Andy3456

Consent in having sex is still not taken by boy's even today and I don't think so they used take consent then.

Haan but normal marriage n abduction marriage are different na.

She was a kid just out of an abduction trauma, how pleasant that relation could be

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

@Bold this is against equality. When men could be happy to marry multiple women why can't women be happy in same condition?

Not sure whether or not Draupadi was happy at Polyandry, but she was an adult unlike Subhadra who was still a 15 year old

When draupadi came out supposedly from fire she would had been supposedly near by 13 as she is often termed Kumari chaapi , in her swayamber she would be near by 16 . Draupadi was not of 25 or 30 when she married

I don't know u read or not one man from West bengal case against lord Ram for marrying sita at her age was 6 during her swayamber. He presented full proof about it