Originally posted by: .Vrish.
That's what I thought as well. Although in the serial, they showed Ugrasen turn on Kansa after the latter murdered Kirtiman - the first baby - and Kansa responded w/ a coup that toppled him. Something about that sequence didn't look right.
I actually much prefer the sequence of events as it was shown here and kind of hate versions that have Ugrasen dethroned and imprisoned before VasuDevaki's wedding. For the latter to treat Kans with any sort of respect or affection after he did that to her uncle/his father doesn't make sense.
Also, I wouldn't say Ugrasen *turned* on Kans in that one instance. The characterization in this pre-Krishna period of the show was very detailed and well thought out, with Ugrasen and Kans having a difference of opinion on democracy vs. dictatorship right from the scene in which all the Mathura characters are introduced in Ugrasen's court. The frustration between father and son boils over when Kans puts VasuDevaki under house arrest after the akashwani, but Ugrasen is content because he has control over the army and Kans alone won't be able to succeed in his cruel intentions. This is what prompts Kans to court Jarasandh's alliance, empowering him to both kill Kirtimaan and stage his coup. These early episodes are my favorite part of the show from a screenwriting standpoint--the portrayal of events and characters as well the overall worldbuilding of pre-Krishna Mathura are very logical, gripping, and well articulated so you understand everyone's motivations and the stakes of Krishna avataar feel as high as they need to.