Mahabharat Retelecast Discussion Thread 4 - Page 33

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

U mean they had different palace at outskirts of indraprastha ??

Since Pandavas use 2 keep draupadi as top priority , so maybe they don't go 2 their personal wives in Draupadi's year .

Yes. Palaces at outskirts of Indraprastha.

May be, they used to be fully devoted to Draupadi at their year.

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

This is not written anywhere but I feel when any Pandavas would have his year with draupadi then maybe 4 that particular year that particular wife would had been send 2 her maayka, so that draupadi exclusively have that year with that pandav , it would be fair 4 draupadi 2.

For example yudi had his year with draupadi , then devika would had been sent 2 her maayka.

As we not be possible 4 pandavas 2 trouble every other year outside indraprastha 2 his wife kingdom.

The yearly division is not mentioned in the epic

It is only said that no other Pandav was allowed to meet Draupadi when she was with someone else

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

The yearly division is not mentioned in the epic

It is only said that no other Pandav was allowed to meet Draupadi when she was with someone else

Drapaudi is mostly found in yudhishtra s company. That s just shows that drapaudi was only married to yudhishtra and polyandrous marriage is an interpolation.

Wrong thread 😆

Originally posted by: Poorabhforever

Drapaudi is mostly found in yudhishtra s company. That s just shows that drapaudi was only married to yudhishtra and polyandrous marriage is an interpolation.

If so then why did she was insulted in dice came by karn ?

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

If so then why did she was insulted in dice came by karn ?

Seriously?? Karna insulting her only goes on to show his sick mentality than anything else. Let us not try to justify or give reasons for all the vile acts he committed in the dice hall. He was vile man that s why he said what he said.

Originally posted by: Poorabhforever

Seriously?? Karna insulting her only goes on to show his sick mentality than anything else. Let us not try to justify or give reasons for all the vile acts he committed in the dice hall. He was vile man that s why he said what he said.

I never supported karn for dice game , he don't need reason 2 insult her.

I very strongly believe karna had no right to oven his mouth in duet sabha , he was a servant 2 Hastinapur not prince.

As u say draupadi was married only 2 Yudi for that I said.

Thou polygamy was common those day before dice game I think no one questioned draupadi for her multiple marriage.

Was Abhimanyu really 16 in MB war ?

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

Was Abhimanyu really 16 in MB war ?

As per epic yes. Although I think he could be slightly elder since the Uppandavas were younger to him and all of them participated in the war

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

I never supported karn for dice game , he don't need reason 2 insult her.

I very strongly believe karna had no right to oven his mouth in duet sabha , he was a servant 2 Hastinapur not prince.

As u say draupadi was married only 2 Yudi for that I said.

Thou polygamy was common those day before dice game I think no one questioned draupadi for her multiple marriage.

Polygyny was common, but not Polyandry. However saying that even that didn't make anyone eligible for character assassination basis this.

Anyhow I do opine that the Polyandrous marriage was there, it is present in too many places to be an interpolation, but people might have different opinions about it.

Karna being so vocal in a hall, (not just humiliating Draupadi and Pandavas), but actually shutting up and scolding Vikarna, repeatedly ordering Dusshashan is a clear indication that the discrimination he faced earlier (if at all he did) was a class discrimination and not caste discrimination. Else with a somewhat equal class status, he could scold, put off and order the royal Kshatriya princes of his overlord's family