Originally posted by: myviewprem
Till a person is legally divorced by law he is married to the woman
A third human has no rights to have affair and have baby from a married man till he legally divorces
Before adultery was crime punishable under law
Recently court has said adultery is not crime any longer means man or woman who has adultery shall not go to jail
But society will always consider child out of wed lock as illegitemate
Such kids face lot of discrimination in society and life especially in conservative society like India it will be tough for such kids to live as they face social boycott and humiliation on daily basis
Law may be ok with maya having affair with MJ but society shall never accept it ever not her relation with MJ not her child out of wed lock
Maya should have thought about the childs future while having affair with MJ in first place
MJ was staying with antar and his two kids in same house how a man who had divorce can stay with same woman in a house? Manvi should discuss all this with friends and family before falling in love or having affair
But Manvi had fallen for MJ first moment she saw him. That was obvious the way she was acting. No intern will go saying "I am not going to have affair with my boss, thats wrong etc". That only means opposite that shes attracted to him and wants to have an affair badly with the person. But his married status is making her nervous.
With so many ppl in company why only MJ target manvi. Because the others are clever and do not circle around him and act like lost dove in front of him. They all maintain their dignity and know what are the limits. Every girl is thought by parents from young age what is right and wrong when it comes to dealing with a man on streets or office. Has Nandini whose so scared of outside men trapping her innocent daughter never told Manvi whats rights and whats wrong in love and relationship? Has anyone taught every woman how to avoid problems regarding men in india or asia, girls observe and learn how to avoid pesty men and be safe be it school, college or office and roads.
I will not believe being born in a conservative society like India where men and woman roles and behavior are clearly demarked from childhood Manvi was so innocent to be trapped by a 45-50 year old man like MJ in office. Manvi had liked MJ from first minute and was fascinated by the rich powerful MJ so she had affair with him. If a person is so innocent as Manvi was assumed to be ppl will take advantage of her in school or college only. She need not wait to go to office to meet a man like MJ, she will get many in school and college only who will be ready to fool her. For me Manvi was fascinated by MJs personality an fan girl kind of desire and when he started showing interest she fell for him, divorce or not was secondary in this affair actually. If divorce was so important for her to have an affair she would find out from colleagues and other outsiders whether MJ was really divorced before having a baby from him.
Somehow our society will want to put all blame on one person for affair and absolve other of all blames. But from how law sees it a adult above 18 can vote and decide who rules their country can also decide whats right and wrong especially on very important matters like life partner or an love affair. Law will not accept Manvi's saying that MJ fooled her. Similarly many who are fooled by others may be in jail for various crimes, law will never take that argument by a person whose done a big sin or crime. Same as Maya now going and saying MJ killed my child so i killed Rishi. Law will say you should have filed police complaint against MJ and others for attempt to murder and killing you. You cannot become a judge as per your own will and mete out punishments for crimes against you. That is a lawless land where ppl will mete out punishment to others.
What i am surprised is that Rudra does not know MJ affair with Maya where it came in press and TV too? 10 years back youtube and fb all was there. So that affair would be avilable. in 1980s may be this affair would hide not in 2010