Sleet of Emotional Quivers on RadhaKrishn Eternal Love CC # 6 - Page 38

Originally posted by: Viswasruti

Is she looking like Rukmini, the incarnation of Mahalaxmi for these people?? 😕

Which book, which scripture is there who can capture the infinite elegance of that Lakshmi whose beauty cast its majestic charm even on Narayan. How can I note down the magnificence of that Woman whose actual beauty lies in her extremely beautiful heart, that heart which one and only belongs to her Narayan, her Madhav? She never roamed like a listless woman in the streets of Brindavan interacting with Ayan and othersLet me try my best to gather all the description of her from different scriptures as far as possible---

HARIVAMSHA PARVA,

Tasyastrailokyasundaryastr^itIye.ahani Yadava | Rukmabhushanabhushinya bhavishyati svayamvarah || 2-47-8

O Yadava Krishna! The Svayamvara mode of a marriage of the most beautiful woman in the three worlds, decorated in golden ornaments, will be conducted there on the third day from today.

The lady who dwells in the heart of Narayan is the most beautiful woman in the whole three worlds.

Even Vaishampayana said that there is no other lady on this Earth who is as beautiful as Rukmini.

Krishna saw her near the temple as though Laxmi herself was stationed. She was endowed with a beautiful form. Even Krishna left mesmerised. Even Krishna said that Rukmini is Lakshmi herself with her beautiful form.

Rukmini was the matchless lady in the whole world not only in terms of beauty but also in terms of fame and prosperity. Well this is obvious as she is no other than Supreme Goddess Of Fortune.

Like these, there are many beautiful descriptions in Mahabharath , Bhagavatham, and in many more Upanishads about Rukmini.After all that research they've done, they selected this wafer thin girl as Rukmini?

❤️❤️🥺😭

These CVs are ordinary people Didi. They can only make mirch masala shows. Such divinity is just not their cup of tea. still they keep thinking more crap and keep showing more disaster.🤢

Originally posted by: vyapti

On a different note, we sometimes compare guttery thoughts with non veg.

You see we can eat boiled potato. But can you eat boiled chicken? Well I can not. Non veg if not cooked properly can cause vomiting.

What about chicken stu or soup ? Isn't it basically flavoured boiled chicken ? And sushi is also a very appealing food to many.

I didn't understand the metaphor. Puhleze explain.

May be the non veg comparison came considering oral. That kinda makes sense 🙈

But people keep comparing sex to what not ---from playing cricket to dancing dandiya 😆

Originally posted by: vyapti

Madhuri will fit perfectly in the role of Rukmini.

Saurabh Raj Jain can play Sakha alongside her.
Our cutie patooties Sharath & Hemanth can play Pradyumna & Aniruddha respectively.

Originally posted by: stormborn

Don't forget almost all the bhajans and kirtans are basically romantic Love songs.

And 2 words---- khajuraho paintings😏

I think, or rather firmly believe that , in those days there were child marriages were prevalent and talking about love was considered taboo, so through these pics they tried to educate the young couples to live happily further. Another interpretation says they served as a form of sex education, by rekindling passions in the ascetic minds of people, who were probably influenced by Buddhism.

And there are several interpretations that speak of varying beliefs in Hinduism that seem to be in the fore. One of them speaks about leaving your lust and desires behind before entering the temple – which is probably why there are no carvings of sex inside the temples.

Hmn.. today all the girls here involved in some masthi, 😊happy to be here with all of you, spending sometime with friendly interactions! Shhh ... don't be surprised thinking ' what way she talked with us , this confused soul??" 😆at least felt like I am with my friends for a few minutes spending time happily here.🤗

They should have taken Chahat Pandey (Their previous choice for Radha) to play Ruku. That girl is beautiful not that zalak isn't but Chahat fits better in this role.

Originally posted by: Viswasruti

These paintings are based on Jayadeva's Ashtapadis, the seductive songs of Radhakrishna lovemaking! If you watch around the people who are visiting this place, you get varied reactions from people who visit the town. While some are cynical, others cringe. A few are embarrassed, others are disappointed!!!

I think, or rather firmly believe that , in those days there were child marriages were prevalent and talking about love was considered taboo, so through these pics they tried to educate the young couples to live happily further. Another interpretation says they served as a form of sex education, by rekindling passions in the ascetic minds of people, who were probably influenced by Buddhism.

And there are several interpretations that speak of varying beliefs in Hinduism that seem to be in the fore. One of them speaks about leaving your lust and desires behind before entering the temple – which is probably why there are no carvings of sex inside the temples.

Hmn.. today all the girls here involved in some masthi, 😊happy to be here with all of you, spending sometime with friendly interactions! Shhh ... don't be surprised thinking ' what way she talked with us , this confused soul??" 😆at least felt like I am with my friends for a few minutes spending time happily here.🤗

So in conclusion, the ancient people knew the importance of sex education, the 2020 people don't. 😐

Originally posted by: stormborn

What about chicken stu or soup ? Isn't it basically flavoured boiled chicken ? And sushi is also a very appealing food to many.

I didn't understand the metaphor. Puhleze explain.

May be the non veg comparison came considering oral. That kinda makes sense 🙈

But people keep comparing sex to what not ---from playing cricket to dancing dandiya 😆

Well again trying to explain. I am not a fan of most of the item songs. But I do extremely love " in lamhon ke daman mein"

Sensuality is pleasing only when it has depth.

Well I myself is a confused soul.

https://youtu.be/jsGc34Wet3M

Chahat and Sumedh 😳

Originally posted by: vyapti

Well again trying to explain. I am not a fan of most of the item songs. But I do extremely love " in lamhon ke daman mein"

Sensuality is pleasing only when it has depth.

Well I myself is a confused soul.

It's true for most women. That's why women need long foreplay to get aroused. For men, it's easier and more instant.

Most of the Kama sutra is about sensuality, caressing and lessons on how to satisfy women.

Originally posted by: stormborn

So in conclusion, the ancient people knew the importance of sex education, the 2020 people don't. 😐

Remembered a story my mother told me.

When Acharya Shankara challenged Ubhaya Bharati in a debate she asked him some questions regarding sex education. So Shankaracharya entered the body of a dead king and asked questions to the queen. The queen got suspicious and asked for evey dead body to be burnt. Shankaracharya returned to his body and told Ubhay Bharati that he has learnt it. Then Ubhay Bharati became his disciple.