Provocation,instigation, reaction, manipulation and bias - Page 2

Originally posted by: sahisri

If All this qualities makes the instigators real then I would never want to these kind of "REAL" on weekdays and different kind of REAL on weekends🤷‍♀️

Aur humare Sallu ji bolte Hain ke ye log fake nahi karte hai.

Originally posted by: kusima

connection is to be made with boys not girls, it was directed to devo being bff with paras

Eggjhactly...it was wrt Paras only...but samjha karo Shuklaji ka woh matlab nahi tha 🤪

Originally posted by: soap_fan

Aur humare Sallu ji bolte Hain ke ye log fake nahi karte hai.

😂😂😂

1 week we are seeing dont we know who is real or fake?😋

Originally posted by: sahisri

😂😂😂

1 week we are seeing dont we know who is real or fake?😋

Not according to Sallu!!! He thinks Sana chest bumps everybody she is angry at outside too

Originally posted by: denver_diva

I’m not a Shukla fan but here Shukla didn’t say chipak ke sote hain to Devo for boys and in her character context. It was for her and Rashmi- to mean that they stick up for each other even when they are wrong - in the context of tight friendship bond. The bahu gang twisted it and made it sound different- just like they always do. Remember how he said gutter mouth to Dey and Rashmi twisted it and made it gutter log for herself? Same thing. Shukla didn’t attack anyone’s character.

He said chipak ke soti hain phir bhi tumko choose nahi kiya - what does that have anything to do with Rashmi and Devo sticking up for each other? If anything, it’s the exact opposite - he said despite what all Devo is doing, she’s not chosen.

I have one question - if he meant Rashmi, when was Rashmi in a position to choose Devo and didn’t?

This is Shukla’s MO - he says exactly what he wants to without using the exact words, like an utter coward, so that he can later twist it to the other party’s shitty interpretation.

Very good post!

I am not at all surprised by the bias and frankly the last season I watched ( 11), was very biased to suit one psycho contestant's narrative & fake dukhbhari story. And after that neither do I expect a shred of credibility and fairness esp when ot comes to Salman nor am I surprised.

This time, it is just so easy to condemn both the groups that it is almost comical that Sallu is failing to do so. I mean this is just preposterous that 1 line of condemnation does not come out of his mouth for Sana.. while he categorically bashes others.

Originally posted by: kusima

connection is to be made with boys not girls, it was directed to devo being bff with paras

But it was in the context of sticking up for each other, not character assassinating. That’s a totally different thing.

aggression aur loose motions(verbal diarrhea wala) ko bhul gaye ho aap😆

BB ke dictionary mein

provocation ka matlab proactive

instigation ka matlab entertainment

manipulation ka matlab smart

bias matlab fair

Originally posted by: SP2684

He said chipak ke soti hain phir bhi tumko choose nahi kiya - what does that have anything to do with Rashmi and Devo sticking up for each other? If anything, it’s the exact opposite - he said despite what all Devo is doing, she’s not chosen.

I have one question - if he meant Rashmi, when was Rashmi in a position to choose Devo and didn’t?

This is Shukla’s MO - he says exactly what he wants to without using the exact words, like an utter coward, so that he can later twist it to the other party’s shitty interpretation.

Arre baba chipak ke sona was in the context that itna tight bond Phil bhi choose nahi kiya- means don’t trust her friendship. Not character assassination.

Originally posted by: denver_diva

Arre baba chipak ke sona was in the context that itna tight bond Phil bhi choose nahi kiya- means don’t trust her friendship. Not character assassination.

I’m sorry - I don’t get that, nor see that - for miles. Itna deep dive into Shukla’s psyche to get all the way to the above inference is beyond me.

To me - Shukla wasn’t advising Devo against Rashmi’s friendship - he was taunting her. And it was not benign in the least. Besides, it’d be helpful if Shukla grew a spine and simply said it like it is - would avoid people having to glean into his matlabs and intents thus.