***Sorry double post***
DRUNK SHADI 7.3
Shameless Abhira Sharma
DRUNKEN HOLI 6.3
🏏 T20 World Cup 2026: Celebration thread 4 Ind's win against Eng SF🏏
Neena Gupta Pregnancy Rumours
I'm gonna miss Barkha
How Embarrassing
🏏 India Women tour of Australia 2026: Australia W vs India W Test🏏
Anupamaa 06 Mar 2026 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
Kiara Advani in Madhubala biopic - produced by Sanjay Bhansali
Anpi Prayansh Aransh FF - Swapnakoodu
***Sorry double post***
Originally posted by: ANGELshweta
So what do you expect ? If you are given the same task, would you defend yourself or not ? Rashmi was just stopping him...not pushing him...and Who started it first ... it's Shukla...clearly šµ he ruined a task completely...he was disgusting....such a rude n arrogant person...I hope salman bursts on him in wkw...š„±
So when Paras ruined Shuklaās ladder, it was part of the game? However, when shukla ruined others it was disgusting? What kind of BS logic is this? It could be all Shuklaās plan so that no one can replace Asim and Aartiās position. I agree that Shukla was wrong to flip tables over, he was wrong for not having contol over his anger. But he wasnt wrong for destroying other teams game. They all didnt complain or gave Paras any shit when he decided to ruin Shuklaās game
Wait! So what Rashmi is doing in this video is called pushing?
So what should Shukla's act with Mahira be called? Coz for the lack of a better word, it wasn't this innocent atleast?
Nobody in the forum has even questioned Shukla for holding Rashmi's wrists, you know?
Originally posted by: Sabhayata
Exactly . I mean what else are girls supposed to do. Either they can go and sit inside quietly or retaliate which they did. Of course Mahira and Rashmi pushed his hands away because they were trying to save their ladder. They didnāt go charging at Sid , going close to his mouth and shouting. And itās not even about girls even if it was Dey whom Sid was fighting with it would have been equally wrong because he canāt defend himself against Sid. Hell in the end if all the 4 girls would have gotten together and tried to destroy Sanaās ladder even that would have been unfair.. 4 girls vs 1 girl would have hardly been a fair fight. So itās clearly not about feminism or girls.
Now explain this to all the shukla fans and copies of aartis out there
Originally posted by: TheBigTamasha
Maharaja of Saandpur ne farmaan jaari kiya tha ki dare neone touches my ladder fir toh pralay aa jaayega š so how dare Paras didn't follow d diktat š” add to dat un char mahilao ne Maharaja ke prakop ke khilaaf khade hone ka dus saahas kiya when dey always have d option of either becoming his doormat like Aarti or a daasi like Sana Maharaja's mardaangi was on full display yesterday chalo ab bolo Saandpur ke Maharaja ki jai!!! š³
I honestly donāt get it. On the one hand, the defense is that the girls ganged up to protect their ladders, so what was poor Shukla supposed to do? Him strategizing is well and good. And on the other - the expectation is that the girls shouldnāt have done anything - them strategizing is not ok.
And I honestly donāt get all the āthe girls started it, and what was Shukla supposed to do - just sit thereā? Erm - the tone was set by Shukla - he gave out orders that no one will touch his ladder - no one is obliged to obey the brute, and Paras didnāt. That is what set Shukla off on a rampage. How is anyone there expected not to respond to the tone set is beyond me - and because they did, ulta itās them that started it. And generally, only Devo goes nuts in tasks - the other girls, while aggressive donāt go to the extent they did yesterday.
My questions - why did Shukla give out those orders in the first place, and why did he start destroying everything - not just ladders? And why is that ok? Iād really like an answer to that devoid of Shuklaās imaginary virtues and other contestantsā faults - but I havenāt come across any yet.
š¤£Originally posted by: TheBigTamasha
Maharaja of Saandpur ne farmaan jaari kiya tha ki dare neone touches my ladder fir toh pralay aa jaayega š so how dare Paras didn't follow d diktat š” add to dat un char mahilao ne Maharaja ke prakop ke khilaaf khade hone ka dus saahas kiya when dey always have d option of either becoming his doormat like Aarti or a daasi like Sana Maharaja's mardaangi was on full display yesterday chalo ab bolo Saandpur ke Maharaja ki jai!!! š³
Arrey hum praja Maharaja me against nahi bol sakte warna kayamat ajayegi šš¤£
I honestly donāt get it. On the one hand, the defense is that the girls ganged up to protect their ladders, so what was poor Shukla supposed to do? Him strategizing is well and good. And on the other - the expectation is that the girls shouldnāt have done anything - them strategizing is not ok.
And I honestly donāt get all the āthe girls started it, and what was Shukla supposed to do - just sit thereā? Erm - the tone was set by Shukla - he gave out orders that no one will touch his ladder - no one is obliged to obey the brute, and Paras didnāt. That is what set Shukla off on a rampage. How is anyone there expected not to respond to the tone set is beyond me - and because they did, ulta itās them that started it. And generally, only Devo goes nuts in tasks - the other girls, while aggressive donāt go to the extent they did yesterday.
My questions - why did Shukla give out those orders in the first place, and why did he start destroying everything - not just ladders? And why is that ok? Iād really like an answer to that devoid of Shuklaās imaginary virtues and other contestantsā faults - but I havenāt come across any yet.
U won't even get ne milenge bas equality pe pravachans, pravachans n more pravachans š
No one is justifying Shukla here. What he did was wrong, but the fact that women decided to play women card when things didn't go their way that was plain unnecessary. Did Shukla pushed Mahira on chest as she complained? No.
There was only two ways to stop this push and pull drama. Either Girls could have just gone away and let Shukla do his bulldozing or Shukla going away and let girls do their thing and win task. If someone can tell me what was the third solution please?
Exactly and he even threatened to break her handsOriginally posted by: BebaakBegum
Wait! So what Rashmi is doing in this video is called pushing?
So what should Shukla's act with Mahira be called? Coz for the lack of a better word, it wasn't this innocent atleast?
Nobody in the forum has even questioned Shukla for holding Rashmi's wrists, you know?
Originally posted by: Sabhayata
Exactly and he even threatened to break her hands
He did? What?