Originally posted by: SP2684
Hmm let’s see. Mahira pushed Shukla’s hands away to save her work. Why did Shukla then slam into Mahira’s space and aggressively push her body (not hands)? Because...equality infused tit for tat.
A fully grown adult who’s been around for some years is Shukla - and yet, he believes in his pea sized, rage-overtaken brain that there is physical equality between him and Mahira, and therefore his ever juvenile tit for tat is not only justified but equal. I can’t even.
1. Space ? So, Mahira has space and Shukla has no space . Why was Mahira pushing Shukla's hands who was doing his job of destroying her Mud-Ladders ? Most importantly, while doing so , Mahira invaded Shukla's SPACE .
2. 'SLAM' , 'Aggressively' is all relative. --- why not retaliate by pushing on the hands only because she pushed hands --- Ohh, in a matter of seconds one will get time to think/decide that she pushed me in my Hands (which is not part of my body) so I will not have to push her body...only hands.
3. A fully grown child who’s been around for some years is Mahira - and yet, she hallucinates and lies in her pea sized, frustrated-overtaken brain.She also plays Victim and Woman card.
4. Let's say it was tit for tat. So, what type of tit for tats are justified ? Reverse the whole scenario, How will it feel that Mahira invaded Shukla's space while reciprocating because He was just saving his work by pushing her hands.
JUVENILE who ???
It is Mahira . .... lying around that she did not started the push and to think we will be fooled.
Also , how does one's loud voice change the narrative , it's his ingrained attribute , unless it doesn't harm others.
Edited by EagleEye - 6 years ago