Shukla's cheap comment - Page 3

Originally posted by: bAkChOd.xD

He said "tum sathmein baithne, chipak k sone k baad batein karne k baad bhi tumhara koi nhi hai support karne ko" ....he meant she couldnt make connections..and devo also replied with same sentence like "tum bhi chipak k soye sana k sath but u didnt save her"... So both meant about connections only but devo twisted it later

What is the difference between what you are saying and what TM said? TM is also saying he said you slept with people yet couldn't make connections and that is what Sid said that even after sleeping closely you didn't make connection. What is the difference?

Originally posted by: astha36

Oh my god. I didn't even catch that. He said THAT? And Aarti still stands by him? OMG. I'm not surprised with Sana still standing by him cuz I don't think she has any self respect anyway but Aarti did a lot of natak that time with Dey. Wow.

Originally posted by: Sabhayata

He said many things. He even told Rashmi when he was holding her hands ki tere haath tod donga.

What the fck.

How are people supporting this shit man. Colors should be dragged in courts for not getting this man out of the show this very instant and putting others in danger.

Originally posted by: Sabhayata

No he said he will quit if he took Paras’s name. Which he didn’t . But he did say what TM has said. Both Dey and Sid are equally bad.

No there is a big diff btw Shukla and Dey. Sid meant she sleeps with the girls chipak chipak ke and still no one is there to support her. He never mentioned her sleeping with paras or dey, if your watching the show properly you would of understood he was talking about girls. Devo took it wrong and unnecessarily dragged Sana. Dey's comments are actually cheap. What Dey said to Aarti last week it was obvious he meant everyword, but it was taken so lightly by all the girls in the house and salman also said he didn't mean that way, like seriously "WOW".

Originally posted by: bAkChOd.xD

He said "tum sathmein baithne, chipak k sone k baad batein karne k baad bhi tumhara koi nhi hai support karne ko" ....he meant she couldnt make connections..and devo also replied with same sentence like "tum bhi chipak k soye sana k sath but u didnt save her"... So both meant about connections only but devo twisted it later

" Itna karne k baad, chipak k sone k baad, baat karne k baad phir h nahi koi tumhara... So sad"

This is what he said. He dint said anything about baithna, bithana.

He directly said "chipak k sona".

So, what type of connection does he meant by chipak k sona? Matlab bas usi tarah k connections hote h according to Shukla.

Originally posted by: shiny9911

" Itna karne k baad, chipak k sone k baad, baat karne k baad phir h nahi koi tumhara... So sad"

This is what he said. He dint said anything about baithna, bithana.

He directly said "chipak k sona".

So, what type of connection does he meant by chipak k sona? Matlab bas usi tarah k connections hote h according to Shukla.

https://twitter.com/SidRaBB13/status/1187206765961605120?s=19

Originally posted by: gunita_03

No there is a big diff btw Shukla and Dey. Sid meant she sleeps with the girls chipak chipak ke and still no one is there to support her. He never mentioned her sleeping with paras or dey, if your watching the show properly you would of understood he was talking about girls. Devo took it wrong and unnecessarily dragged Sana. Dey's comments are actually cheap. What Dey said to Aarti last week it was obvious he meant everyword, but it was taken so lightly by all the girls in the house and salman also said he didn't mean that way, like seriously "WOW".

@bold he dint said girls k sath chipak k sone k baad. He dint even uttered the word girls.

And they were talking about Rose Task that how Shukla preferred Arti over Sana. Uske baad Shukla said those lines. He clearly meant how none of the boys with whom she shared bed (or rather in his language chipak k sone k baad ) dint supported her during the nomination tasks.

Of course you are free to defend him. But here he wasn't talking about girls. He clearly meant about boys though he dint mentioned names.

Both Shukla and Dey's comments are wrong and cheap. But I fail to understand why only Dey is blamed and not Shukla. Yesterday, he did character assassinated Devoleena.

Originally posted by: gunita_03

No there is a big diff btw Shukla and Dey. Sid meant she sleeps with the girls chipak chipak ke and still no one is there to support her. He never mentioned her sleeping with paras or dey, if your watching the show properly you would of understood he was talking about girls. Devo took it wrong and unnecessarily dragged Sana. Dey's comments are actually cheap. What Dey said to Aarti last week it was obvious he meant everyword, but it was taken so lightly by all the girls in the house and salman also said he didn't mean that way, like seriously "WOW".

when did he said that he meant girls? or are you just assuming it

connections are meant to be made with the opposite gender so that statement wouldnt make any sense

seriously just stop defending this horrible piece of shit

its not about bigg boss anymore this guy is a danger to society

Originally posted by: sahisri

https://twitter.com/SidRaBB13/status/1187206765961605120?s=19

Yes, he did said it. Maine phirse avi dekha. Us line k aage piche dono k conversations. He clearly meant that none of the boys supported her in nomination task. chipak k sone k baad v devo ko koi fayda nahi mila. This is what he meant.

Paras k liye bola ya regarding any other boy. Whatever he said was very very wrong. Like Dey, he too has a filthy mouth.