Anurag's contradictory words and Actions again - Page 12

I think people here have the intelligence to differentiate between a post( post number n ) that is made solely for the purpose of bashing and mocking a character vs a real analysis .

To all those who have not watched the first 200 episodes, you are at distinct disadvantage understanding the character of Anurag. You just don't know him. To focus on his flaws based on a few episodes is just plain wrong!!

Anurag, before he was butchered to accommodate the whitewashing of Bajaj, was a decent, honest, trustworthy, noble, totally lovable character. He was good in the face of evil. He cared deeply for his family and Prerna's family and fought against any wrongs. He would never ever would have staged his own fake accident.

I saw some traits of the old Anurag in the last night's episode. Let's hope the old Anurag is back soon!

Originally posted by: EtherealRati

And regarding watching the previous episodes......see dear for someone to actually go and watch 200 episodes, a person needs to be interested in that stuff.....and i and i feel for majority of bajaj fans that they arent really intetested in anurag prerna as a couple. So nobody is gonna and go watch those episodes. But the logic that a person cant give his/her views on characters because the person hasnt watched 200 episodes......thats not right.....a person can give view on a character from what he/she has been watching. It doesnt take rocket science to understand a male lead in telivision industry. If you wish to show the positivity in anurag through those episodes dear ......than i would like to state that none of us had entered with a notion that anurag is villain.....we were aware that its gonna be bajaj who is gonna do disastrous stuff........instead i personally claimed that they will never show anurag doing that accident planning because he is ml but cvs did went ahead with it......now when we see anurag doing something in front if our eyes which we find questionable.....our openion hold equal value as yours. It doesnt hold less value because we havent watch 200 episodes.

Originally posted by: -Doppelganger-

I think people here have the intelligence to differentiate between a post( post number n ) that is made solely for the purpose of bashing and mocking a character vs a real analysis .

I think we will just have to agree to disagree here.

I have no issues with character bashing - Bajaj can be called a creepy, tharki budha for all I care, he is not real and a figment of someone's imagination and I don't see why what is in your opinion character bashing should lead to bashing of the poster.

Originally posted by: -Doppelganger-

I think people here have the intelligence to differentiate between a post( post number n ) that is made solely for the purpose of bashing and mocking a character vs a real analysis .

Hi DG. Even if the post was made with an intent to bash/mock, which IMO it's not, how does that justify bashing the poster/member ?

Originally posted by: dahibhalle

I think we will just have to agree to disagree here.

I have no issues with character bashing - Bajaj can be called a creepy, tharki budha for all I care, he is not real and a figment of someone's imagination and I don't see why what is in your opinion character bashing should lead to bashing of the poster.

I have nowhere justified bashing of the poster. Please do not put words in my mouth. You attacked members here for their lack of civility and intelligence, which is a personal attack IMO.My post was a response to that. I am sorry if it came across as justifying the bashing. That was not my intention. I guess we(members of this forum) are protective and stand up ONLY for those who have similar views as us. Applicable to all including me.

Originally posted by: -Doppelganger-

I have nowhere justified bashing of the poster. Please do not put words in my mouth. You attacked members here for their lack of civility and intelligence, which is a personal attack IMO.My post was a response to that. I am sorry if it came across as justifying the bashing. That was not my intention. I guess we(members of this forum) are protective and stand up ONLY for those who have similar views as us. Applicable to all including me.

Please don't say sorry.

I think of you as one of the saner posters here and apologies for misunderstanding .

I stand by what I perceived as a lack of civility.

Originally posted by: -Doppelganger-

I think people here have the intelligence to differentiate between a post( post number n ) that is made solely for the purpose of bashing and mocking a character vs a real analysis .

there is nothing new in this forum to bash character or mock a character. a lot of posts are here by a lot of people where others character are mocked , bashed and what not. at first it happened on EDT , but now ther eis no EDT then MF is that place. but on the name of giving reply on post , member are mocking , moral policing, personal attacking, teasing member is not cool na.

i salute ur perseverance to scrutinize action, words and behaviour of a fictional char who is not at all ur fav...n consistently criticize him for anything and everything.........

lage raho...

Originally posted by: memad

i salute ur perseverance to scrutinize action, words and behaviour of a fictional char who is not at all ur fav...n consistently criticize him for anything and everything.........

lage raho...

criticism toh mai day 1 sei karti hu jab iyea forum mai bajaj ke bajase ayi thi... a lot of posts i have here .. nothing new for me.. and not only anurag , mai toh bajaj ko bhi nei chora.. uska bhi criticize kia maine.. even i have posted a lot of posts regarding nivi, anupam, moloy , kuki , prerna as well as , kabhi criticize or praise... may be apko nei dekha mere other posts, selective posts hi dikhe hai ...aur aise koi offensive word mai use bhi nei kia .. where u have to moral policing. bakio ka alag bat hai , but atleast i dint expect from you at all .. kher

and yes , i will continue .. anupre fd really appreciate me a lot from yesterday 👍🏼