How Is Sona At Fault? - Page 2

Originally posted by: Amy142

You may be right. But let's watch the scenario play out as per sonakshi's point of view and find out what exactly happened that day.

Having said that no one is saying that suman was right.

That's y why I am telling I am ready correct my opinion if it is shown diff in episode , I stated on the basis of sbs segment...

Suman is wrong acc to me from sbs

Originally posted by: sahisri

The same stranger saved her daughter life...its called humanity....suman might be correct thinking about her daughter alone but she is inhuman, if she really of saving raima she might have thought diff ways and again suman being a strong woman who raised 3 kids alone in mumbai city is afraid of struggler threats??its not convincing at all

Suman wasn’t in the position she is in now. Sonakshi’s big success came with KPK. So if Karan had destroyed sona’s Face they never would have been able to survive. Acid attacks are a real fear in India.

Originally posted by: malikakas

Suman wasn’t in the position she is in now. Sonakshi’s big success came with KPK. So if Karan had destroyed sona’s Face they never would have been able to survive. Acid attacks are a real fear in India.

See I said in before quote itself she is not wrong in thinking about her daughter but one photo call or some other means also can help her if she really bothered about that person.

karan threatened not to call police alone ryt , I dont think he told not to help raima also

Originally posted by: sahisri

See I said in before quote itself she is not wrong in thinking about her daughter but one photo call or some other means also can help her if she really bothered about that person.

karan threatened not to call police alone ryt , I dont think he told not to help raima also

Sorry, quoting you in this post. Coz you replied before I editted.

However, holding sonakshi beholden to raima isn't right. Plus no one went to seek raima's help. She wasn't out to save sonakshi's life. She was there to help her friend and called sonakshi to show her the real face of Karan. I might have missed out, but did sona know raima before that day?

Originally posted by: Amy142

Sorry, quoting you in this post. Coz you replied before I editted.

However, holding sonakshi beholden to raima isn't right. Plus no one went to seek raima's help. She wasn't out to save sonakshi's life. She was there to help her friend and called sonakshi to show her the real face of Karan. I might have missed out, but did sona know raima before that day?

Her friend left not to think about karan they y raima will help her friend?sona should know raima to save her😑??raima called sonakshi and told about karan n told to come to farm house...when sona came same time raima fell down in front of her car

Originally posted by: sahisri

Her friend left not to think about karan they y raima will help her friend?sona should know raima to save her😑??raima called sonakshi and told about karan n told to come to farm house...when sona came same time raima fell down in front of her car

Sona had no obligations towards raima wrt helping her. I didn't say that sona should know raima to save her. I was just asking a question if sona knew raima.

My intent is to say that Sonakshi was not responsible for what happened to raima. Her inability to help raima doesnt make her a criminal or responsible for raimas condition in any way.

Originally posted by: Amy142

Sona had no obligations towards raima wrt helping her. I didn't say that sona should know raima to save her. I was just asking a question if sona knew raima.

Same if raima had thought that sonakshi would have been married karan....it is just humanity which is needed to save the other person who saved her

Originally posted by: sahisri

Same if raima had thought that sonakshi would have been married karan....it is just humanity which is needed to save the other person who saved her

That's y I asked what about the zillion other people who had passed through that road? And didn't help? All are inhuman in your eyes? Then y is a person being singled out?

Her being married to Karan or not isn't the question here. I am pretty sure raima didn't save Sonakshi, neither was it her humanity which made her ask Sonakshi to come, see the truth.

My intent is to say that Sonakshi was not responsible for what happened to raima. Her inability to help raima doesnt make her a criminal or responsible for raimas condition in any way.

Originally posted by: Amy142

That's y I asked what about the zillion other people who had passed through that road? And didn't help? All are inhuman in your eyes? Then y is a person being singled out?

Her being married to Karan or not isn't the question here.

My intent is to say that Sonakshi was not responsible for what happened to raima. Her inability to help raima doesnt make her a criminal or responsible for raimas condition in any way.

It is farmhouse,donno whether anyone saw her ....yes who all saw her n left her there are inhuman not only sonakshi...

Originally posted by: sahisri

It is farmhouse,donno whether anyone saw her ....yes who all saw her n left her there are inhuman not only sonakshi...

I think you are deviating from the topic, how is Sonakshi at fault?