Kangna on sex: Parents should be happy children having sex. - Page 3

Originally posted by: anjs

It's not about being happy or sad.... Indian parents already have their plate full with worries for their kids...... Imo they just need to chill at least here...... Whether the kids are having sex or not, is their personal matter.... Parents shouldn't be overtly involved at least in this matter..

Let us concentrate only on the rights of individuals to do whatever they please.

What is the age of consent in India? When is a person considered an adult and therefore able to make their own choices and become independent? At what age are parents no longer financially or legally responsible for a child?

What I mean is, that in some countries up to 18 years parents are responsible for any child who is a minor legally and financially, and they can go to jail for neglect if they do not perform their parental duty, by law the person under 18 is treated as a minor in all aspects, they are not questioned without a parents permission, treated medically, get loans etc... because there are minor protection rules, including the court system that is separate into juvenile court and adult court. (only in rare cases does someone below 18 becomes emancipated or is legally tried as an adult-only in rare cases and after a court of law rules it so)

On the day the person turns 18, they are considered an adult, so they can leave their parents house, live on their own, they can vote, make medical decisions, drink, party, have sex everyday with whoever they want and everything else adults do. BUT they are also responsible from that point on, to support themselves financially, make choices and if they commit a crime, have a vehicle accident, get in debt etc.. then they are on their own. By law Mom and Dad are not responsible.

If she means an emancipated or adult son or daughter, then she should not use the word "children", anything under the age of consent is very much a parents business, there is no such a thing as a personal matter in a child's life, when you are under your parents roof and they are supporting you then everything is a parents business, because they are responsible.

I am surprised that with all the societal rules and all the moral restrictions imbedded in a culture where people are judged severely for any infraction that attempts against the moral norms,or the virtue of a woman, someone like kangana is applauded for the things she says and the way she behaves. If a man had said what she said, today in India that guy would have been posting bail.

this time its not RANGOLI man to blur out garbage .... its directly from horses mouth !

Originally posted by: CriticusExpert

OK let's leave out, customs, morality, religion, family bond, propriety and all the other cultural things that attach families or in this case children to parents.

Let us concentrate only on the rights of individuals to do whatever they please.

What is the age of consent in India? When is a person considered an adult and therefore able to make their own choices and become independent? At what age are parents no longer financially or legally responsible for a child?

What I mean is, that in some countries up to 18 years parents are responsible for any child who is a minor legally and financially, and they can go to jail for neglect if they do not perform their parental duty, by law the person under 18 is treated as a minor in all aspects, they are not questioned without a parents permission, treated medically, get loans etc... because there are minor protection rules, including the court system that is separate into juvenile court and adult court. (only in rare cases does someone below 18 becomes emancipated or is legally tried as an adult-only in rare cases and after a court of law rules it so)

On the day the person turns 18, they are considered an adult, so they can leave their parents house, live on their own, they can vote, make medical decisions, drink, party, have sex everyday with whoever they want and everything else adults do. BUT they are also responsible from that point on, to support themselves financially, make choices and if they commit a crime, have a vehicle accident, get in debt etc.. then they are on their own. By law Mom and Dad are not responsible.

If she means an emancipated or adult son or daughter, then she should not use the word "children", anything under the age of consent is very much a parents business, there is no such a thing as a personal matter in a child's life, when you are under your parents roof and they are supporting you then everything is a parents business, because they are responsible.

I am surprised that with all the societal rules and all the moral restrictions imbedded in a culture where people are judged severely for any infraction that attempts against the moral norms,or the virtue of a woman, someone like kangana is applauded for the things she says and the way she behaves. If a man had said what she said, today in India that guy would have been posting bail.

Yes I understand your point.... Even I thought use of children is wrong.... There is a reason kids below 18 are supposedly dependent on their parents.... Cause they lack the experience to make a wise decision...

As for kids above 18, I believe the parents shouldn't involve in the intimacy matter at all, whether positively or negatively..... Just make sure that they know to be safe.....

Our society is not such that parents would be happy with their daughters sleeping with different men.... Unfortunately different rules are set for the sons.... But that is a different discussion...

In ancient times, there were set rules for even general way of living, like a person was suppose to follow brahmacharya till the parents get him married, that was cause sex was suppose to be a distraction, just like drinking and gambling and hence when a person is growing up and aiming to achieve the professional goals, they were asked to stay away from such vices.... Sex after marriage was obviously important for the next generation's birth.... Then the man was supposed to live a full life with his wife and kids, look after his parents till a certain time, then get his kids married after some time take sanyas... So this mindset has continued till at least our previous generation where sex is tabboo before marriage..... But it slowly changing...more men are open to having a life partner who has had sex before marriage.......

If a Male stalker or Sexual offender spoke such things, they wud be bashed and sent for therapy. I hope God punishes this remorseless, shameless and repeat offender even if our Biased Laws does not.

She is the first Rape "victim" who loves to talk about Sex. Which shows wat a pervert, pathalogical liar and criminal she is. Nobody has misused the fact that she is a woman as much as her. If she was a man, she wud hv been publicly hanged by now

Next what?

Parents should be happy kids banging married men. Parents should be happy kids harassing co stars. Parents should be happy kids are stalking and writing Emails to married male star. Parents should be happy kids abusing everyone on social media. Parents should be happy kids using sex with consent as rape to trap someone.

She and her sisters are example of 'what women should not become'. They walk around like someone spreading awareness, but they are the reason behind social evils. Both are jokers.

Originally posted by: KootyPai

Okay. So people advocating casual sex here. Don't mind me asking, but the people ( both males and females) who are into casual sex, can they stay loyal to their partners after marriage?

Why not. Obviously there is a reason they are married to the spouse and not having just casual sex with them.

Originally posted by: ThunderLight

She is the first Rape "victim" who loves to talk about Sex. Which shows wat a pervert, pathalogical liar and criminal she is. Nobody has misused the fact that she is a woman as much as her. If she was a man, she wud hv been publicly hanged by now

Hello there. You can be sex positive and a rape victim at the same time. Sex positive - consent,rape - no consent. Ironically more sex positive people are prone to rape because men think they are easy and will take it.

Originally posted by: AllThatCritique

Hello there. You can be sex positive and a rape victim at the same time. Sex positive - consent,rape - no consent. Ironically more sex positive people are prone to rape because men think they are easy and will take it.

Hello there. She is a Fake rape victim. She herself is a Habitual and Repeat Sexual offender who does not understand CONSENT.Even Prostitutes understand CONSENT. Criminals like her DONT. It is like Asaram talking about how parents shud encourage children to have sex. Dont associate normal human behavior with this ___.

Originally posted by: ThunderLight

Hello there. She is a Fake rape victim. She herself is a Habitual and Repeat Sexual offender who does not understand CONSENT.Even Prostitutes understand CONSENT. Criminals like her DONT. It is like Asaram talking about how parents shud encourage children to have sex. Dont associate normal human behavior with this ___.

I don't think you are anybody to decide her rape was fake. She is indeed someone who is a sexual offender because there is enough proof. But still,her rape is valid or not, or the fact that she was raped once or many times,we don't get to decide that. On a forum of all places.