Originally posted by: Manasi_16
Actually Shravan and Prem have been made into classic cases of nature-nurture conflict.
If one presumes that genes have a major part in deciding how a person is, then Prem should be exemplary and Shravan bad
If one presumes nurture and upbringing plays the biggest role in making a person then Shravan should be good and Prem not so much.
But EK in her bid to showcase Anurag's phooti kismat ended up showing that neither Anurag's upbringing, not his blood had any positive effect 😆
Sometimes I feel hiw crazy are these writers...do they actually read/see episodes before airing?
But Didn't they both end up becoming good.
I want to share a theory here from one of my genetic class as you have mentioned this Shravan and Prem thing.
A gene will surely decide what you becomes. But so that the nature. Its not 50-50 things. It works a little differently. Like place a pious man's son for example a pandit son who had been grown up in a religious env or not into a bad environment for while. He will turn bad but the religious part of him will always have a chance to outcast the env. Similarly, if a bad person's son is placed in a religious env and he becomes good there will be always a chance of him turn bad in a given situation. Its gene and env combo.. Not 50-50 but the amount you put into it.
Prem had Prerna and Anurag as his parents... And even if not like Anu he had something from Prerna. He also tried to givr away Mukti to Kul following his father's step. And about Prerna.. He was like her, insistent, stubborn and bit talkative and happy happy.
And in case of shravan why only comparing with aparna.. He's Debu's son too na.. So eventually he turned good too.
Its all complicated.. Genetics is a hell of a subject. And the more you will read genetics the more you get to respect woman.. Thats what my sir used to say. :p and he wasnt wrong afterall.