Originally posted by: asmaanixx
Yup!
And live-in does not automatically equate to having pre-marital sex. Sex very well could be involved in some couples, but it's not mandatory. What matters is a couple's compatibility and their understanding of one another and the type of efforts they're willing to put in to solve any conflicts that may arise.
But thats the whole concept of Live-in na. Couples usually opt for a "live-in" relationship after dating for a while, when they are comfortable sharing the same space with each other everyday, and of course physical intimacy is most likely involved in these kinds of relationships. Live-in gives you an opportunity to know your partner in every way without having to engage in a legally binding relationship. Thats the whole concept of Live-in. So, in most cases, Live-in does involve sex, or physical intimacy, and there is nothing wrong with that as long as its consensual.
Hanita's case however is different. They started living together in the same house as landlord and tenant first, and gradually built their relationship to this stage. So, technically they are living in together, but not really in a "live-in relationship" in the practical sense. And everyone in the mohalla knows, and esp Lovely knows how HS/Babita ended up living in the same house, so I don't understand her taunting Babita on "live-in sin". Knowing both HS/Babita's personalities, people around should know that they will not be comfortable in having a physical relationship without marriage, and lets say even if they did, so what? They are two adults in their 30s. Its not like its a crime .
And did Lovely forget that her own brother and Meeta were also in a live-in, where the entire family was a testimony to this, including lovely who lived in the same house. Tab live-in sin nahi hua. So, why this expectation to be pious and virtuous only from Babita?
Edited by LoveInAutumn26 - 6 years ago