Sidhharth Malhotra, Arjun Kapoor, Parineeti can bounce back

Although movies are entertaintment for an average audience but for bollywood fans they develop connect with stars even if they are not your favourites. In recent times Siddharth and Parineeti delivered a flop. Although the concept was good , it was written badly. Juhi chaturvedi would have taken the concept in a different zone had she been there. Same with arjun Kapoor whose India's most wanted failed.

If John Abraham after a disaatrous and unsure career can again be a A list hero. If Hrithik can rise from the ashes as in super 30. If Shahid after being a small budget actor and sidelined in padmavat can make a robust comeback, if Kangana despite mixed B0 performance and ememity can survive then definitely the sexy hunk Siddharth malhotra , the serious stud arjun and the chirpy and beautiful parineeti will pass these bad phase.

Ayushman was almost over after hawaizaade. And now he is a brand

I may dislike a film or may not be a fan of an actor but would never want the career of any actor to wind up so soon. It feels bad especially when established stars vanish out of sudden.

But this sympathy doesnt awake for those actors who didnt deliver from beginning like Prateik Babbar , Sikander Kher, Harman Baweja. They never ignited hope . But there were actors who srarted well but got topsy turvy. Siddharth, Arjun , Parineeti truly deserve to get back their places they acquired .look at Imraan Khan. It felt bad when Imran Khan who started so well in Jaane Tu ya jaane na dissapeared. The onslaught of bollywood fridays pulled him down. Aditya Roy kapoor after the superb Aashiqui also slowed down. Blame it on whatever poor scripots, bad luck..etc etc . Another actor i feel has still a lot of screen presence to show is bipasha basu.

But just because they failed we cant say they dont deserve to survive.

Without a good performance, a good script alone cannot help their luck.

"But this sympathy doesnt awake for those actors who didnt deliver from beginning like Prateik Babbar , Sikander Kher, Harman Baweja. They never ignited hope."

^^ Cannot tell the same for Harman Baweja, he was a looker and could emote expressions well too despite of his average acting skill. Even Sanjay Leela Bhansali told that Harman would have a great future ahead, SLB even casted him for Chenab Gandhi movie but for some unknown reasons it got shelved. Overall bad luck and poor script choices ended Harman's film career.

Originally posted by: ffkhan

Without a good performance, a good script alone cannot help their luck.

But there are so many films with bad scripts running so well at Box office not just now even long before in 90s even post 2000's during 2003- 2010 and so on..

Thats why i beleive luck also plays 80% role.

and i hate that bullshit reason - script selection.

Unless the actor is offered great scripts how will that person choose. Ayushman's good script are because those are offered to him, he didnt go to the homes of writers

Originally posted by: ffkhan

"But this sympathy doesnt awake for those actors who didnt deliver from beginning like Prateik Babbar , Sikander Kher, Harman Baweja. They never ignited hope."

^^ Cannot tell the same for Harman Baweja, he was a looker and could emote expressions well too despite of his average acting skill. Even Sanjay Leela Bhansali told that Harman would have a great future ahead, SLB even casted him for Chenav Gandhi movie but for some unknown reasons it got shelved. Overall bad luck and poor script choices ended Harman's film career.

i do somewhat agree, he had a very cute boyish face. Good physique too. His second movie on cricket was good. Amrita Rao had some hits in her career but she sank. Ayesha takia didnt rise with wanted but salman did

Yes, they can bounce back. Bounce back to where they were before joining Bollywood. To oblivion.

John's career didn't take off because he got a late debut in his early 30s and never got enough opportunities. Still he has got a reasonable fanbase. Not the same case with Sid, Arjun or Pari who are practically nepotism products.

the rate at which Arjun and Parineeti was building themselves, yes they can after a time bounce, literally.

Originally posted by: AliaBhatt

But there are so many films with bad scripts running so well at Box office not just now even long before in 90s even post 2000's during 2003- 2010 and so on..

Thats why i beleive luck also plays 80% role.

and i hate that bullshit reason - script selection.

Unless the actor is offered great scripts how will that person choose. Ayushman's good script are because those are offered to him, he didnt go to the homes of writers

In case of Ayushman, his acting is definitely up to the mark. If you compare his acting with Sidharth and Arjun Kapoor then I would put Ayushman at first.

John is surviving because he is producing most his own content. Genius of him to create Vicky Donor.

Dont think Parineeti or Sid have enough money for that - Arjun may star living off Daddy's production company soon.

Produced By Arjun Kapoor

Distributed by Boney Kapoor

Starring: Janhvi Kapoor, Anil Kapoor and Shanaya Kapoor

Originally posted by: Luna46

Yes, they can bounce back. Bounce back to where they were before joining Bollywood. To oblivion.

John's career didn't take off because he got a late debut in his early 30s and never got enough opportunities. Still he has got a reasonable fanbase. Not the same case with Sid, Arjun or Pari who are practically nepotism products.

Hope they survive. About nepotism and all people didnt care and accepted them with open arms I remember in ladies Vs Ricky bahl Parineeti was talk of town and did do well with ishaqzaade hasse toh phasee similarly arjun was suddenly talk of town with ishaqzaade and then the 100 crore hit two states. Gunday, Mubarakkan also gave him praises. So we cant say audience didnt like them.

Lets see how audience reacts ahead