TC: Mr. Bajaj REVEALS his reason for marrying Prerna, focus on family! - Page 6

Originally posted by: braveheartdoc

Arey Pari woh iconic character hai samjha karo wo kuchh bhi kare sab theek hai. 🤣

I hope they show him too paying for his deeds as no-one is spared from their karma. But yes he is the reason for destroying so many lives and such things should never be promoted. Kisi bhi reason ke liye ek ladki ki life spoil karna justify nahi hota.

@Bold my hope is only on karma, as karma visits everyones bhagya once in lifetime.

Looking for how bhagyavidhatha manipulates karma also.

May be he will do deal with karma also as he is iconic character.

Originally posted by: arshi_asya

There is a striking difference between Ishita & Prerna.

Ishita knew Ruhi & knew everything about her background & yet entered a marriage with Raman only for her. She shared a bond with her that knew no bounds & Raman & his family too knew about it all. Ishita wasn't tricked into being Ruhi's mother but it was her conscious decision. The bond was nurtured, explored from day 1 before Ishita entered that role legally.

Prerna on the contrary thinks Bajaj is a bachelor when he is clearly a divorced man with an 8-year old. If there are children, tell the other partner about it before marriage. Prerna did it but Bajaj didn't. And no, Prerna didn't sign up to be a mother to his children. It's a burden that comes on her with this marriage of which she is made aware after the marriage. Till when was Bajaj planning to delay this revealition. While he demanded her loyalty, it didn't cross his mind to even know if this woman right there would like to have responsibility of a special child while she is going to have her own. Saving or clicking with a child immediately doesn't equal to saying yes to mother the child 24*7. One needs to take explicit consent for that which is absent in this case. If Anurag had hidden about his child from Prerna while marrying her, then it would have been wrong too. Did Prerna accept this child till now? NO. She now will have to since she will have no choice.

Yashoda didn't know that Krishna was someone else's son because when she woke up, Krishna was by her side as her own son. So, that analogy doesn't hold true.

Hiding about a child when marrying someone & then expecting that the new spouse should be good to her because legally she is the step mother/father is wrong.

Well said👏👏👏

As Prerna is forced into the marriage similarly she is forced into this step mother relation with Sneha. Now she is in for another Kasauti..... if she accepts her soon people would question her love for Anurag and her own child while if she doesn't then bashing for not accepting a special child when she herself accepted this deal cum blackmail. As she is being questioned when she thinks about Anurag even after marriage so she is bound to be bashed for this even more. Writers can never think of anything reasonable. Prerna is in for more bashing from every side.

Originally posted by: _charu_

I am sure there is no revenge or personal vendettas now . Coz mr bajaj has to he shown the "kind" hearted one. He may have even plotted ronits murder trial and all . So that does not make him less guilty of putting a condition in front of prerna and forcing her to accept his condition . Blackmail and a deal. He was waiting for the opportunity when anurag will be trapped by ronit .

Anyways. Come.bk frm swiss bec its unbearable. And family drama coming up doesnt look any good either. Last thing i wud like to see is moh niv part 2 in bajaj mansion .

Kahani har ghar ki

I agree with Arshi ji. I dont like the sneha reason at all. And Bajaj shld have atleast revealed this to her before marriage. I doubt it wld have affected prerna decision but still he shld have revealed he has a daughter.

That's a big thing to keep a secret from ur wife..

Even if it's a deal , the deal mentioned for prerna just marriage. The child part was not there.

Who knows if she is comfortable taking care of child or not?

If prerna now wants to move out of this deal, I will support her . The child shld have been mentioned by Bajaj.

Originally posted by: ifmember

No, everybody's opinion differs, and it would be better if we agree to disagree, no one can stop a good number of people who see this as blackmail with their reasons just because others don't see it that way.

To each their own.

Edit: If this is not fine, I can bring up a lot more points and ask people to stop doing that

Originally posted by: mily_mathew

Yes, I agree, calling Anurag a kidnapper is wrong, that s what I said, both Anu and bajaj are wrong right now. But I don't see blackmail in what he did.

To each their own 😊

Originally posted by: mily_mathew

Yes, I agree, calling Anurag a kidnapper is wrong, that s what I said, both Anu and bajaj are wrong right now. But I don't see blackmail in what he did.

Originally posted by: intruderfast

I agree with Arshi ji. I dont like the sneha reason at all. And Bajaj shld have atleast revealed this to her before marriage. I doubt it wld have affected prerna decision but still he shld have revealed he has a daughter.

That's a big thing to keep a secret from ur wife..

Even if it's a deal , the deal mentioned for prerna just marriage. The child part was not there.

Who knows if she is comfortable taking care of child or not?

If prerna now wants to move out of this deal, I will support her . The child shld have been mentioned by Bajaj.

To save anurag lifetime she has to be with deal

Word marriage deal comes with all responsibilities which coonects with every relationships of bajaj associated with.

Deal is perfect no loopholes to break the deal

Originally posted by: ifmember

To each their own 😊

As such, I don't have one, if Anurag was wrong during Anukom track, there he deserved to be called a lot of names, but he got off easily from viewers and from the family. Makers will do that to bajaj too, only prerna suffers in this show.

Originally posted by: MERARAI

There was a fabulous post over a week ago from a new poster who explained blackmail in simple language.

What RB did was blackmail no ifs or buts. But CVs have decided he will be glorified as a villain but called a hero. It’s a scary idea that ppl watch such charactersand chalk it up to “grey” character.

CVs continue to glorify negativity more and more in their shows and society starts to pooh pooh it so when such atrocities do happen to real people society has already been desensitized to it that they just see it as the new normal of our times and sweep it under the rug. and sweeps it under the rug.

Is it any surprise that it’s almost always a rich man who preys on a young girl from a middle class family to show their power.