Why is Rangoli attacking Deepika, Shabana, etc? - Page 3

Originally posted by: Sadhanai

Well, Kangana said the journalists could be behind bars because by law the complainant in such cases gets some confidentiality and that law applies to celebs as well.

Here, her sister must be disappointed as she seems to have expected something more as usual from those celebs.

As for Sunaina, I'm thinking that Kangana really did block her calls eventually but probably it was Rangoli who spoke to her for a month and then tweeted about it as Rangoli has more free time to do that.

Rangoli did file a complaint earlier on as well against the Pancholis for extortion and assault but after Kangana recently visited the police and gave a full testimony, it looks like the additional charges have been added on based on what she said and investigation is underway now.

According to her, it's never only Rangoli, it's always kangoli tweeting.

But if she was the one who really complained against Aditya..a person who paid bills for her treatment after attack 👎🏼

Ye behne kisi ko attack na karein toh shocking hoga.

Originally posted by: niyati13

According to her, it's never only Rangoli, it's always kangoli tweeting.

But if she was the one who really complained against Aditya..a person who paid bills for her treatment after attack 👎🏼

They had spared Pancholi, that's why he was never charged before for his offences. Kangana has a habit to publicly speak about her story and they had an issue with that so they filed a case. I'm sure Kangana can and would have paid off whatever amount she owed, which the Pancholis had asked for but they kept trying to get money from Kangana so Rangoli has even included extortion in her complaint.

Rangoli Chandel

@Rangoli_A · 23h

Whoever it may concern, complain against Pancholi had been lodged in 2007 for physical abuse harassment and extortion, he has taken more than 1cr from Kangana saying he has fed her for 3 months when she was homeless ( grocery bill of three months

🙄

)...(contd)

(Contd)... but he wanted more money after that, last message of extortion I myslef received from him was in 2016 which has been submitted to cops and now FIR has been lodged, she had absolutely no time for all this...(contd)

Originally posted by: Nova19

Tweeting venom while pretending it’s all on her sister when she’s called out for it. Did anyone see her talking about Sunaina when asked by reporter on camera? “Her family is taking care of her and I wish them all the best.” Who would guess Kangana had been so beside herself with worry she couldn’t think what to do besides tweet her fears for Sunaina’s safety, call the Roshans criminals and express her terror at what her parents were doing to Sunaina just days ago.

She also freaked out and told reporters not to sensationalize the rape case and they could not name the complainant and if they did name the complainant they would be put behind bars. Now she has her sister pretending she is the one who filed the complaint against Pancholi and Kangana didn’t when the spokesman of the Mumbai police is on video saying the “complainant” said she had been sexually assaulted so are they claiming he assaulted both, is there some other “top actress” involved, or did Kangana file the complaint like everyone assumes? And why after going on national TV making all these claims in the first place does she not publicly stand behind filing the FIR?

Regardless, it seems like fewer people are falling for her victim act judging by the twitter comments. Even Kangana fans are begging for Kangoli to stop.

Kangana and her sister are hypocrites of the highest order. Nothing they do or say surprises me anymore.

Saw the video, when she was asked about Sunaina she was taken aback and tried to callously evade the questions by saying that Sunaina is under her family's guidance and they are taking care of her. The reporters caught her unprepared for sure.

Did not follow the rape case against Pancholi, so she is trying to sensationalize the case herself via Kangoli's tweets?

Har roz ka drama ... 🤦🏼‍♀️🤦🏼‍♀️🤦🏼‍♀️

Originally posted by: Sadhanai

They had spared Pancholi, that's why he was never charged before for his offences. Kangana has a habit to publicly speak about her story and they had an issue with that so they filed a case. I'm sure Kangana can and would have paid off whatever amount she owed, which the Pancholis had asked for but they kept trying to get money from Kangana so Rangoli has even included extortion in her complaint.

Rangoli Chandel

@Rangoli_A · 23h

Whoever it may concern, complain against Pancholi had been lodged in 2007 for physical abuse harassment and extortion, he has taken more than 1cr from Kangana saying he has fed her for 3 months when she was homeless ( grocery bill of three months

🙄

)...(contd)

(Contd)... but he wanted more money after that, last message of extortion I myslef received from him was in 2016 which has been submitted to cops and now FIR has been lodged, she had absolutely no time for all this...(contd)

You are missing my point. She does have a habit to speak publicly about her “story”. She told a story about an older man who took advantage of her and hit her (and she immediately got up and hit him back) with no names for ages. Everyone assumed it was Pancholi but she didn’t name him. Eventually she named him and that is when he could sue and did. If you look at the story she is telling now to the police it is quite different. They have added lots of new charges: drugging her, photographing her, sex films, extortion, she was held for years against her will (too bad she didn’t think to ask anyone for help at the BW award shows he took her to). It’s a totally different story. Meanwhile we are supposed to believe the woman who talked about “sperm panties”and “vaginal cameras” when it came to her imaginary lover somehow left these sensational experiences out when talking about her actual lover?

Originally posted by: Nova19

You are missing my point. She does have a habit to speak publicly about her “story”. She told a story about an older man who took advantage of her and hit her (and she immediately got up and hit him back) with no names for ages. Everyone assumed it was Pancholi but she didn’t name him. Eventually she named him and that is when he could sue and did. If you look at the story she is telling now to the police it is quite different. They have added lots of new charges: drugging her, photographing her, sex films, extortion, she was held for years against her will (too bad she didn’t think to ask anyone for help at the BW award shows he took her to). It’s a totally different story. Meanwhile we are supposed to believe the woman who talked about “sperm panties”and “vaginal cameras” when it came to her imaginary lover somehow left these sensational experiences out when talking about her actual lover?

You cannot wake up someone who is only pretending to sleep. That Sadhanai is clearly trying to defend the indefensible for a agenda

Originally posted by: ThunderLight

You cannot wake up someone who is only pretending to sleep. That Sadhanai is clearly trying to defend the indefensible for a agenda

Even asleep people are conscious at some level... these people are pretending to be dead

Originally posted by: Nova19

You are missing my point. She does have a habit to speak publicly about her “story”. She told a story about an older man who took advantage of her and hit her (and she immediately got up and hit him back) with no names for ages. Everyone assumed it was Pancholi but she didn’t name him. Eventually she named him and that is when he could sue and did. If you look at the story she is telling now to the police it is quite different. They have added lots of new charges: drugging her, photographing her, sex films, extortion, she was held for years against her will (too bad she didn’t think to ask anyone for help at the BW award shows he took her to). It’s a totally different story. Meanwhile we are supposed to believe the woman who talked about “sperm panties”and “vaginal cameras” when it came to her imaginary lover somehow left these sensational experiences out when talking about her actual lover?

Her story doesn’t make any sense. If she was drugged, held against her will, then how did she attend shootings of her first few movies? She was still with Aditya at that point of time.

I don’t understand how some of her fans cannot see loopholes in her story!

The stories kangana makes up about her life would make a good source for a movie..Wonder if her life was really so eventful.

A movie on her would be engrossing and repulsive at the same time