Mr.B is negative character-DT NT Pg37 - Page 19

Originally posted by: mily_mathew

If you really moral police, we can start with private things that are being said about women in at, we don't want that, don't we.

No WE do want to. Lets compare the guttery jokes we crack in the PArica AT and probably already are being or will be cracked in the Karica AT with rape comments. Yes lets do that!

Originally posted by: mily_mathew

how will girl be OK when guy marries someone else.

their r circumtance yr ppl break off on ugly note

sometime parents pressure & many thing

when girl file the case judge saw all these thing

pre marital sex is not rape but bif girl.really find boy did it intentionally & try to trap her & use her only then it comes under criminal case

aare nahi toh aajkal toh her ladka rapist hi kahlaye 😆

Originally posted by: UKGirl22

Yes there are lot of things that Bajaj can also be doing to acquire companies legally rather than bribing and cheating his way into situations... to be honest starting with getting some proper night clothes.😉

Ain't u behind his colorful material 😉

Originally posted by: UKGirl22

I meant intent under law which has NOTHING to do with perception of audience. Section 375 of the IPC has a very clear definition of rape. When judges interpret the law and make judgements they look at the intent of the individual and the specific circumstances. Trying to win a point by simplistically saying any man who have sex with a woman before marriage thinking they are going to get married and then happens to marry someone else, is committing rape is just fake news.

There are many thinks that Anurag did wrong in that track and you are welcome to focus on that but there is no need to throw words like rape unnecessarily.

I am talking about perception of audience because it is a tv show. Original post is saying that Mr. Bajaj is blackmailing Prerna which is against law, and she is correct but ultimately it is Prerna who has to file a complaint against Mr. Bajaj, like it was Prerna who had to file a complaint against Anurag when he humiliated her.

Think from perspective of Prerna in Komolika marriage track, she did not know that Anurag has married Komolika because she blackmailed him, Anurag had coitus with her then humiliated her and married Komolika.

Anurag committed bigamy but Prerna or Komolika had to file a case against him, Prerna could have filed a rape case against Anurag, similarly now she has to file a complaint against Mr. Bajaj.

I don't know how can I be clearer about this

Originally posted by: arshi_asya

In the recent case, SC has actually said that it's not rape if its consensual. The whole pretext of marriage thing is stupid when in live-in. Man said he would marry you & you believed him & gave willing consent to sex. It's not rape because active consent was there. People in relationship are not legally bound to marry each other no matter how many big promises you made to the partner.

Prerna had sex with Anu because Anu promised marriage & she believed him. Anu didn't rape her since she gave her consent to the act. If Anu married her then the marriage should have been registered in the court to make it legal or there should have been witnesses who saw that Mandir marriage which will work as testimony to Prerna's claim that she was married to Anu. Only Prerna's claim will not work if Anurag denied it openly & married Komo in front of everyone since there is no credible evidence except claim of one party. Law operates on evidence. It's unfair but that's how it is. Evidence is the exact same thing that saves people from false convictions in real world.

Rape is a serious issue with a legal definition. Don't twist it just because one didn't get things in their own way & make it difficult for those who actually get raped.

Reality is different than these TV soaps where they show all this stupidity. Snap out of it.

You are supporting my arguement, right? So rather than snapping out of it🤣...I should stay right in it!

Originally posted by: Wistfulness

The definition of pedophilia is just a click away. Pedophilia is when an adult is attracted to CHILDREN. A 22-year old woman is an adult and relationship between two adults doesn't fall under the domain of pedophilia. Stop being so blind in hate.

People see what they want to see and disregard the rest.

This forum has gone from entertaining to bonkers!

Imagine characterising the relationship between adults as pedophilia and imagine using such a grave crime as pedophilia to score points over an ITV show.

This is what happens when you have teenage heart throbs and their teen fans with half-baked, retarded, knowledge of sex.

Originally posted by: NoraSM

I am talking about perception of audience because it is a tv show. This post is saying that Mr. Bajaj is blackmailing Prerna which is against law, and she is correct but ultimately it is Prerna who has to file a complaint against Mr. Bajaj, like it was Prerna who had to file a complaint against Anurag when he humiliated her.

Think from perspective of Prerna in Komolika marriage track, she did not know that Anurag has married Komolika because she blackmailed him, Anurag had coitus with her then humiliated her and married Komolika.

Anurag committed bigamy but Prerna or Komolika had to file a case against him, Prerna could have filed a rape case against Anurag, similarly now she has to file a complaint against Mr. Bajaj

I don't know how can I be clearer about this

You quoted a case saying to prove Anurag raped Prerna and I said you are wrong.

The point who are making now is a different point and about bigamy and blackmail etc. You can be as clear as you want about it, but it still does not make you right about the rape comment.

Originally posted by: abcdexyz

Ain't u behind his colorful material 😉

Seriously this is the real crime. They did the same thing to Komo. Why do they take good looking people and make them look like clowns?

Originally posted by: dahibhalle

This forum has gone from entertaining to bonkers!

Imagine characterising the relationship between adults as pedophilia and imagine using such a grave crime as pedophilia to score points over an ITV show.

This is what happens when you have teenage heart throbs and their teen fans with half-baked, retarded, knowledge of sex.

Now, Why bringing this in between ??

Originally posted by: UKGirl22

You quoted a case saying to prove Anurag raped Prerna and I said you are wrong.

The point who are making now is a different point and about bigamy and blackmail etc. You can be as clear as you want about it, but it still does not make you right about the rape comment.

I don't think you have read what we were discussing, because my very first post was about Bigamy, rape, trespassing and blackmail.

Members picked up the rape topic from it and I was explaining why I think Anurag raped Prerna under circumstances I have mentioned in my post. You can think I am wrong but it is a TV show, which can be interpreted in different ways.

My last reply to you on this topic because we are heading nowhere with this communication gap. Thanks