A film on Kashmiri pandits refugee now. - Page 3

Originally posted by: flipfl0p

I want Hirani to make a historical. I want to KJo to direct Vishal Bharadvaj kind of movie. I want Vishal to create a KJo kind of movie. I want SLB to do Priyadarshan kind of comedy. Unfortunately, they don't listen to me.

Vivek Agnihotri will make a film on what he wants. Not what you want.

If you want a movie on lynching, make one. Why expect him to do?

good one 👏

Originally posted by: flipfl0p

How many Bollywood movies are realistic? Did you have problem with all of them?

How do you know, it will normalise Hindu terror?

good question............everything is maaf, but dont favour the hindus..... even if they are innocent and betrayed in their own motherland........

Originally posted by: ranikaadi

Because Kashmir apparently according to Liberals belongs to Muslims/Pakistan... ? and their homes have been destroyed.

Who cares what they think. I have a problem with them being called refugees just because they were forced to leave their ancestral land. But they migrated to another state in their home country. Just like thousands who migrate from their hometowns to bigger cities daily. Just that their circumstances were gruesome but that does not make them refugees.

Originally posted by: anjs

good question............everything is maaf, but dont favour the hindus..... even if they are innocent and betrayed in their own motherland........

Hindu's does not need favors. All they need right now is unity. And by that I don't mean getting together for frivolous and nonsensical dietary concerns. Unity to introspect and uplift the brethren who need it socially, morally, economically and ethically.

Btw congrats on the color change 😃

Originally posted by: heartbleed

Why are you being so rude?

Originally posted by: Aviya

Bold: Read and learn, you said. Now I'm going to lie back and watch you throw a little sissy fit.

Originally posted by: DragonQueen

Because it's hard for you to accept that not everyone likes his films.

That holds good for every director. That will not stop them to make movies.

On one side, you want the film to be realistic. On the other side you worry, the movie will show Muslim in poor light. Then how should one make a movie on Kashmiri Pandits? Or they should not be made at all?

Didn't Kai Po Che show Hindus in poor light? ( Train burning was not shown. Only riots were shown). Does that mean, the film should not have been made?

Originally posted by: flipfl0p

That holds good for every director. That will not stop them to make movies.

On one side, you want the film to be realistic. On the other side you worry, the movie will show Muslim in poor light. Then how should one make a movie on Kashmiri Pandits? Or they should not be made at all?

Didn't Kai Po Che show Hindus in poor light? ( Train burning was not shown. Only riots were shown). Does that mean, the film should not have been made?

whats the big deal...

those who want to believe will believe even if it is a pack of lies

those who do not want to believe will not believe even if it is truth

such movies never appeal to the opposite side lol

let people make whatever they want to

wow ,nice, will they show d truth on poor Kashmiri pandits

Originally posted by: Golden-dew

Why are they called refugees in their own country?

ya same que arised in my mind . sad state , Kashmiri pundits refugees in own country , to be honest , every one can ve their own country n countries in dis world but y not sanathana dharma can ve their 1 country d akhanda bharat for them in dis world. sad state sanathana dharma ppl d bhartians d natives n so called majority are living like refugees ,second citizens , neglected ones in own country .