So much abla-ness! - Page 11

Created

Last reply

Replies

104

Views

21.3k

Users

39

Likes

226

Frequent Posters

prerna4rishav thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 6 years ago

Originally posted by: togepe30

I didn't even bash Hritik, and you have exaggerated it to 'severe lack of judgement and commonsense'. Well done! U are very impressed by Rangoli's twitter bashing and stunts.

You have taken the theka of all common sense and better judgement.

God forbid if anyone does not wanna tolerate this drama anymore and expresses the same. Feel free to jump on people and make personal attacks.

Maybe you should join them, you can give it back good to Kangoli. That actually may help Hritik

Anyways, didn't expect anyone to start a fight with me for a comment which wasn't even bashing. Yaha to kuch bhi nahi bol sakte baba.


Well I am not defending anyone (actors or members) but comparing any living or dead creature to Kangu itself is like a gaali / abuse to that other entity. 😆 You didn’t bash anyone intentionally, but thanks to the crassness these 2 sisters, putting people in the same sentence with these 2 automatically is perceived as bashing the others. This is plain my take and I am trying to only lighten the situation. 😆

Daebak thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 6 years ago

Originally posted by: prerna4rishav


Well I am not defending anyone (actors or members) but comparing any living or dead creature to Kangu itself is like a gaali / abuse to that other entity. 😆 You didn’t bash anyone intentionally, but thanks to the crassness these 2 sisters, putting people in the same sentence with these 2 automatically is perceived as bashing the others. This is plain my take and I am trying to only lighten the situation. 😆

Kangoli have turned into gundas. Now they are making people appreciate their films on bandook ki nok. Isnt there any rule in place through which people can file defamation cases against her?

664269 thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago

Originally posted by: togepe30

Kangoli have turned into gundas. Now they are making people appreciate their films on bandook ki nok. Isnt there any rule in place through which people can file defamation cases against her?


People did. Hrithik did, and she chose to not show the proofs she claimed to have and instead said that her laptop and phone has been drowned in water. After that, her sister traumatized Hrithik in twitter by insulting him, his family, his children.

This year, Aditya Pancholi filed a case against her and she blackmailed him, her lawyer threatened him that they will file a rape case against him if he does not step down. Aditya made a video of the whole conversation and gave it to the police where kangna's lawyer was actually threatening him.

Sadhanai thumbnail
6th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 6 years ago

Originally posted by: ThunderLight

Firstly, what is the Proof that the imposter is Hrithik and not Kangana writing to herself? Why is she not eager to catch the imposter which is what normal people wud do? Adhyayan himself told that he never saw a single reply from Hrithik nor any interest in him towards her. So, maybe he did not even receive those messages or even read them as he gets many such messages. I mean he did not even read her Jan birthday message until May 2014. Plus, he told that she was always shy on the sets so maybe considered her as just a fan girl and nothing else. Even those like Yami n so many keep drooling over him. He may not have imagined the extent of her evilness. Hrithik has shown his entire call records public. Why is she not showing hers? Why is she not cooperating to catch the imposter and prove it was Hrithik? Only 1 mail - which is also the one - which Hrithik side put up as it was forwarded by Rangoli.What about all the other mails? If it got deleted, the cyber crime can easily recover it?

That Chitraganda story is another Big lie. Kangana planted lot of fake media stories via "sources" when the fight went public in 2016. Her lies was so much that Hrithik's side was left with no option but to make public her mails.

Fact is: Kangana was the last option for Krrish 3. First choice was Chitragada, then Jacquiline (but Sajid did not want her to play second fiddle) and finally the role went to Kangana. If Hrithik was "interested" in her, neither wud her role be chopped in Kites nor would she been 2nd or 3rd option. Infact, she wud hv been the first option.


Infact, Kangana herself told in interviews in Krrish 3 that Rakesh ji was the one who approached her but she refused it as she was annoyed how her role was chopped in Kites. But, she regretted her decision the next day (this shows it was fully professional working even then). After some more weeks,( after nobody else agreeing for the role) Rakeshji approached her again with a bound script and assured her that since he and not Anurag was director, nothing wud be chopped. And she signed it readily.

Only people with blinders will believe her Bullshit. Especially when all thru the entire timeline, Kangana was herself self admittedly involved with Ajay Devgan, Sanjay Dutt and Nicholas Lefferty including rumors of Salman. Where was the time and space for another guy. She cooked up the entire thing just to cover up her criminal stalking. Wat a cheap bitch.

The messages that Adhyayan saw included that she missed being in his arms were about film shooting only? Some of the e-mails that were released were definitely from her. Kangana though claimed somewhere that Hrithik himself gave her the 'imposter's e-mail address. She also said that he told her which number to call him on and which not, implying he had multiple numbers. Kangana's side of the story has added details other than just a digital liaison. Hrithik was talking about her 'Aap ki Adalat' interview and just laughed it off saying that she was a very convincing liar. While even an Aditya Pancholi filed a case against Kangana after seeing one interview where she added stuff about him.

Daebak thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 6 years ago

Originally posted by: TeAmo_Messi

People did. Hrithik did, and she chose to not show the proofs she claimed to have and instead said that her laptop and phone has been drowned in water. After that, her sister traumatized Hrithik in twitter by insulting him, his family, his children.

This year, Aditya Pancholi filed a case against her and she blackmailed him, her lawyer threatened him that they will file a rape case against him if he does not step down. Aditya made a video of the whole conversation and gave it to the police where kangna's lawyer was actually threatening him.

Wow!

Aditya Pancholi is a sick man but what Kangana did isn't right by any standards. Misuse of law.

Also, did Hritik win that case coz she clearly had no proofs. How does court even accept this 'all evidence got drowned in water crap'.

Twitter has banned singer Abhijeet Bhattacharya in the past. They should get twitter and insta to ban these two.

Edited by togepe30 - 6 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".