Page
of
1
Why didn't Sameer fight for his property rights. If he is the sole hair of nanu's property he should have fought with Mama. One can't accept the fate n start new business instantly. First is to fight, find out the truth how this fraud happened. Even his mom remains silent. This doesn't happen in real life.
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai August 5, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 04 Aug 2025 EDT
UPMA&ICECREAM 4.8
SATYAMEV JAYATE 5.8
BALH Naya Season EDT Week # 8: Aug 4 - Aug 8
Abhira’s infertility issue
Anupamaa 04 Aug 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
Dhanush And Mrunal Thakur Reportedly Dating
The Ultimate PotterHead Challenge
Anupamaa 05 Aug 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
Ibrahim Ali Khan new interview Elle
25 years of Har Dil Jo Pyar Karega
AI reimagines Titanic with Bollywood stars
Rate episode 66: "Ekk Insaan Do Maut"
I think Mamaji and Nanu were business partners. So Sameer would've also worked with Mamaji in partnership. But Mamaji tried to keep Sameer only as an employee and not involve him in bigger decisions. And they would've ruled the business. But now that he's not under their control, they decided to end the partnership. Even in that they've done some fraud in valuing Sameer's share.
It is quite strange that both during the house issue and now with the business neither Sameer nor Vishakha are prepared to fight for what they claim is theirs. There has been insinuation that Mamaji had done something untoward and thus deprived Sameer of what is rightfully his. If this is the case then surely they would have sought refuge with the law. People do not simply leave things as is being shown in this YUDKBH. Then and now people know what avenues are available to them when it comes to property and business issues.In the case of the bantwara in the Agarwals we saw how they had taken stock of what was theirs and claimed it. We also saw how they made each other sign documents to prove what was owing and what was paid. So Anand in particular is aware of how bantwara should be done.Mamaji had said that if they did not trust his accounting then they could send it to a lawyer or CA or any other outside third party. Why did they not take up this offer. Anand is a CA, he could easily have taken a thorough look at the books to determine if Mamaji's calculations were correct or not. He would also have known that in business partnerships there are certain formalities that must be complied with when a partnership is dissolved. Then and now business partnerships are not dissolved simply by word of mouth. There are a number of details to be taken care off. Even if they don't show the details, they should have shown that Vishakha and Sameer are made aware of this. Why has Anand not advised Sameer on this?My take is that there is no proof of deception. Sameer had spent lavishly since he returned from Delhi. Sameer had no idea of the worth of the business nor did he have any real interest in it. All he wanted was the money and luxury that came with the money from the business. Once he behaved badly with Mamaji and family, they allowed him to do as he pleased. He spent lavishly on Naina, friends, himself and finally we saw the no expenses spared wedding etc. His share in the profits of the business was 40%. Four years of spending without putting in any effort will eat away at your money.Mamaji has been made into a villain, but when it comes to the issue regarding Sameer's wealth there is no proof of deception. Sameer's voiceover saying that Mamaji exaggerated the expenses is without proof. We can therefore not conclude that Mamaji defrauded Sameer. Sameer is responsible for his own ignorance and failure to manage his end properly.Vishakha as his mother should have kept tabs on what was happening with his finances and the business whilst he was a minor. Mamaji used to account to her we are made to believe, then she should have known what the business was worth and what's Sameer's portion thereof was worth. If she did not keep herself informed then she has only herself to blame for her ignorance.Originally posted by: CIDWatcher
Why didn't Sameer fight for his property rights. If he is the sole hair of nanu's property he should have fought with Mama. One can't accept the fate n start new business instantly. First is to fight, find out the truth how this fraud happened. Even his mom remains silent. This doesn't happen in real life.
Everybody knew that Sameer was the sole heir to the property and suddenly he is not. Even if we say that Mamaji took over the business, how is it possible that he took over the house so easily? All the time during the wedding track when Sameer brought this gigantic mansion I was thinking how could Nanu leave Sameer without a roof over his head knowing that the kid had nowhere else to go? Beside I also thought Chacaji being a CA would help him audit the business just like Sakhile did.Everybody fights for property rights in real life specially knowing everything was left for him. There is no logic to it.I am assuming the makers have decided to veer away from fiction and are trying to connect back to the real life of the producers' so that they can accelerate them going to Bombay to try their luck. I would have liked to see it done differently because I am really not that much interested in producers's love life but am more interested to see 90s as it was.Originally posted by: CIDWatcher
Why didn't Sameer fight for his property rights. If he is the sole hair of nanu's property he should have fought with Mama. One can't accept the fate n start new business instantly. First is to fight, find out the truth how this fraud happened. Even his mom remains silent. This doesn't happen in real life.
Me too Shilpa. I'm irritated that they have chosen to rush such an important issue from which people could learn alot in the nanme of romance and the producer's "real" story. I prefer autobiographies of persons I admire. I have no reason to admire the producers of a television soapie. The 90s is what drew me to the show, the nostalgia thereof. Now the unrealistic way in which they are showing their setting up a new business in such a short space of time etc. is really making me angry. I'm actually more angry after watching the show than relaxed. After all relaxation is the reason for watching soapies ontelevision.Originally posted by: rituriyaakhil
Everybody knew that Sameer was the sole heir to the property and suddenly he is not. Even if we say that Mamaji took over the business, how is it possible that he took over the house so easily? All the time during the wedding track when Sameer brought this gigantic mansion I was thinking how could Nanu leave Sameer without a roof over his head knowing that the kid had nowhere else to go? Beside I also thought Chacaji being a CA would help him audit the business just like Sakhile did.Everybody fights for property rights in real life specially knowing everything was left for him. There is no logic to it.I am assuming the makers have decided to veer away from fiction and are trying to connect back to the real life of the producers' so that they can accelerate them going to Bombay to try their luck. I would have liked to see it done differently because I am really not that much interested in producers's love life but am more interested to see 90s as it was.
Also, it is said to be inspired by the producers love story, as in set in 90s, School love story etc. and not the actual story . Plenty has been fictionalised so why not this part. They should have chosen a different route. I remember in Delhi, Vishakha clearly mentioning that Nanu has secured Sameers future. Even if they wanted to take them to Bombay, they could have sought another route.Originally posted by: rituriyaakhil
Everybody knew that Sameer was the sole heir to the property and suddenly he is not. Even if we say that Mamaji took over the business, how is it possible that he took over the house so easily? All the time during the wedding track when Sameer brought this gigantic mansion I was thinking how could Nanu leave Sameer without a roof over his head knowing that the kid had nowhere else to go? Beside I also thought Chacaji being a CA would help him audit the business just like Sakhile did.Everybody fights for property rights in real life specially knowing everything was left for him. There is no logic to it.I am assuming the makers have decided to veer away from fiction and are trying to connect back to the real life of the producers' so that they can accelerate them going to Bombay to try their luck. I would have liked to see it done differently because I am really not that much interested in producers's love life but am more interested to see 90s as it was.
Hindi TV Shows
Cricket
Kumkum Bhagya
