it must be retrospection time for cvs...

Page

rajh

@rajh

Sparkler

Posted: 6 years ago

it must be retrospection time for cvs...

rajdeep threatens nandini to burn her alive ...

tv viewing viewer show indifferent reaction to what going on screen and say --jalaa do isko...

then --

its time for retrospection for cvs...they must understand how horribly script has gone wrong..

its time for retrospection for cvs. when negative lead rajdeep gets more support compared to lead kunal..

its time for retrospection for cvs. when nandini fails to get any sympathy despite white washing her character so much...

its time for retrospection for cvs for sure...

Edited by rajh - 6 years ago

Quote

Frequent Posters

Rinnks

@Rinnks

Voyager

Posted: 6 years ago

When Rajdeep gets more sympathy than Kunal 🤣

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Lola

@Lola13

Voyager

+ 4

Posted: 6 years ago

For the CVS or viewers? If the viewers think it's right to abuse a person.. Then I'm sorry it's not the CVS fault but the mentality of the viewers which is wrong. A daily drama is not supposed to teach the viewers how to behave/think like a decent human.

Quote

rajh

@rajh

Sparkler

Posted: 6 years ago

Originally posted by: Lola13
For the CVS or viewers? If the viewers think it's right to abuse a person.. Then I'm sorry it's not the CVS fault but the mentality of the viewers which is wrong. A daily drama is not supposed to teach the viewers how to behave/think like a decent human.

cvs show puke worthy characters on screen and think viewers need to support those clown characters...

then it is joke of century...😉

Quote

anmirza

@anmirza

Dazzler

Posted: 6 years ago

Exactly! I mean I get it that the leads can have flaws but they shouldn't have been made cringeworthy at least! At this point they should move beyond dragging their divine romance 🤢

Quote

@pamk06

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 6 years ago

Originally posted by: rajh

cvs show puke worthy characters on screen and think viewers need to support those clown characters...

then it is joke of century...😉

Agreed but we as viewers should be able to tell the difference between the right and wrong. Just because one is wrong does not mean we have to support or encourage a horrible person like Rajdeep. What Rajdeep is doing to Nandini is horrible and what kunal and Nandini are doing to Mauli is wrong. We as viewers should be able to tell the difference and not support either actions. If someone is thinking and saying Rajdeep is correct, then they, not CVs, need to retrospect.

Quote

Rinnks

@Rinnks

Voyager

Posted: 6 years ago

Originally posted by: pamk06

Agreed but we as viewers should be able to tell the difference between the right and wrong. Just because one is wrong does not mean we have to support or encourage a horrible person like Rajdeep. What Rajdeep is doing to Nandini is horrible and what kunal and Nandini are doing to Mauli is wrong. We as viewers should be able to tell the difference and not support either actions. If someone is thinking and saying Rajdeep is correct, then they, not CVs, need to retrospect.

Daily drama shd also not teach that EMA is divine love..

Now that doesn't mean I m supporting Rajdeep...

Quote

Priya

@Priya_18

Voyager

Posted: 6 years ago

Originally posted by: Lola13
For the CVS or viewers? If the viewers think it's right to abuse a person.. Then I'm sorry it's not the CVS fault but the mentality of the viewers which is wrong. A daily drama is not supposed to teach the viewers how to behave/think like a decent human.

Well, everyone here is polite and says EMA isn't divine, KuNan are not a divine couple. Do the CVs listen? They butcher Mauli's character, make Kunal even more irritating and start whitewashing a stupid character like Nandini.

So when we could not bring any change, the vocal ones, the abusive ones go ahead and start saying jala do isse. It's hard to change the mentality of people, yes, but it's easier to damage the good ones by showing EMA is divine.

When the CVs aren't being remotely responsible, what can we expect from it's audience?

Edited by Priya_18 - 6 years ago

Quote

rajh

@rajh

Sparkler

Posted: 6 years ago

Originally posted by: pamk06

Agreed but we as viewers should be able to tell the difference between the right and wrong. Just because one is wrong does not mean we have to support or encourage a horrible person like Rajdeep. What Rajdeep is doing to Nandini is horrible and what kunal and Nandini are doing to Mauli is wrong. We as viewers should be able to tell the difference and not support either actions. If someone is thinking and saying Rajdeep is correct, then they, not CVs, need to retrospect.

as a cvs they should have shown both as evil -- rajdeep is bigger evil and kundani is smaller evil...

but cvs failed and shown kundini as divine couple and shown them as demigods...

and you expect viewers to buy cvs version and support these divine demigods??

Edited by rajh - 6 years ago