Luna π³ I'm still not connecting the points u bringing here in ur defence n continuously offending her π well Wat I felt is u don't understand her usual way like us n reacting a bit hyper π .no need to give me any clarifications n proofs over ur argument here π .the way it progressing from ur side is not in good way βοΈ if u both have such misunderstandings π n her way of posting really u care this much π it's better to sort out by personal chatting n expressing Wat u felt n listen Wat she say whether coherent or not π³ still u not satisfied better ignore her posts n style which offending u n she does the same π but making personal remarks on her really hurts me π² Wat ever u gives reasons for it π ..n for my defence π if u feel I'm doing wrong or something βοΈ u can name me, criticise me,anything , I don't mind π but leading this unnecessary argument is totally waste of time π³ .
I honestly never wanted to make these posts after my initial one of this series but then...Miss Slippery went too far with her humour.If I said something wrong or even nonsense, she could say to me clearly that I'm on the wrong side of the see sawBut her oversmart ways of handling a misunderstanding between both of us in Comedy Nights Bachao Style of humourhas led to bigger argumentsEspecially her signature line that I'm accusing her of being happy that AB is not being part of Naagin 3When did I said it to her?If you go through my posts, you'll realize that Miss.Slippery has made it up on her own.In fact, I wrote 1st draft of my counter argument nicely that her comment on one of my posts aren't that relevant or even coherent with respect to the context of that particular post of mine and that if she intends to make me feel bad by opposing each and every post of mine in this forum, she should simply refrain from that.But then I remembered Slippery's signature style of sarcasm which involves making her opponents feel bad.And if I say that I felt that she commented on my post which speculated about the future direction of naagin 3 just to oppose my views because she couldn't provide much solid logic in defence of her inference, then she would call me childish and mock me with her trademark humour all around the forum .I knew that she won't understand my point and stop all the misunderstanding between us by making her stand on the issue whether she was purposely opposing me or not clear.That's why I deleted my former draft and wrote a new post in the trademark slippery_chilka style.Because that's the only way to hit back at her, though she's too insensitive to understand all this.I dunno whether you will able to understand my Point of view, but it won't hurt you if you cared to read this particular post of mine carefully.
sorry if I made any thing. any where lead to hurt side π³ for u π ...its my pov βοΈ ..respecting urs with disagreement βοΈ ..