Suman vS. Atharv

Page

Next Last

mama1234

@mama1234

Explorer

Posted: 9 years ago

its very shameful how is most posts about Suman, people have started referring to her as the Mistress. This is absolutely disrespectful for a character.

if Suman is Ramakants mistress, then by that logic Atharv is Vividha's mistress, because Vividha is by law and rituals married to Ravish, but she did self vachan wedding with Atharv, so he is also his mistress.

Quote

Frequent Posters

_innocent_

@_innocent_

Achiever

+ 4

Posted: 9 years ago

Why is it shameful? She was his mistress for however many years. And Atharva did fill Vividha's maang with his blood before she married Ravish (perceive this as you want, since you mentioned rituals, I added that), however SINCE she is legally married to Ravish, I guess he is her mistress (as you put it).

Atleast Vividha has remained true to her mistress (your word) unlike Ramu Ji who slept with his and impregnated her thrice.

Mistress one (Suman) is now planning the murder of mistress 2 (Atharva)! 😆

Edited by _innocent_ - 9 years ago

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

CosmoCoCo

@CosmoCoCo

Inactive

Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: mama1234
its very shameful how is most posts about Suman, people have started referring to her as the Mistress. This is absolutely disrespectful for a character.

if Suman is Ramakants mistress, then by that logic Atharv is Vividha's mistress, because Vividha is by law and rituals married to Ravish, but she did self vachan wedding with Atharv, so he is also his mistress.

and then these people talk about women 's respect Calling a VICTIM woman mistress just because she is Ravish mummy not their god Atharva's mummy

and they forget Suman has saved their god's life If she would not have come in the operation theater Atharva head would be more smashed

Quote

muktha_cute

@muktha_cute

Dazzler

Posted: 9 years ago

So as per ur logic the mistress is Ravish not Atharv

The Vachans and Mang bharna was done by Atharv to vividha in temple bfr God

Thn the so called fake marriage of ravish n vividha happened which can be annualed not even need of divorce

So Mubarako apka mistress ravish

Quote

Sandy

@StardustSandy

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

The very word is disrespectful and should not be used for anyone, noone deserves such an insult neither Ravish nor Atharva nor Suman not anyone period

Quote

Sandy

@StardustSandy

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: muktha_cute
So as per ur logic the mistress is Ravish not Atharv
The Vachans and Mang bharna was done by Atharv to vividha in temple bfr God
Thn the so called fake marriage of ravish n vividha happened which can be annualed not even need of divorce
So Mubarako apka mistress ravish

It could be annuled if there was any other witness /movie/ pictures/ any proof of their marriage, God's presence is important as long as the sentiments are concerned but its not a real marriage till it gets registered and respect from the society, in real life so many girls in our country are the victim of such fake marriages cuz they dont know the difference between a real and fake marriage,they get married in mandir one day and get ditched by bad guys the next day, sirf mann se maan leny se koi pati nahi ho jata apka

Quote

muktha_cute

@muktha_cute

Dazzler

Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: Choco_Mishti

It could be annuled if there was any other witness /movie/ pictures/ any proof of their marriage, God's presence is important as long as the sentiments are concerned but its not a real marriage till it gets registered and respect from the society, in real life so many girls in our country are the victim of such fake marriages cuz they dont know the difference between a real and fake marriage,they get married in mandir one day and get ditched by bad guys the next day, sirf mann se maan leny se koi pati nahi ho jata apka

It can be annualed as its a forced marriage,the girl was forced by her dad

They have enough of proofs for that whole village knows that vitharv marriage was gonna take place on that day in temple which didnt happen,ppl witnessed how atharv got beaten brutally,they can get records of govt hosp where atharv was admitted

All these proofs are more than enough to prove how vividha was forced to marry ravish by her dad

If they apply in court to annual the marriage on basis of proving it as an forced marriage providing the proofs mentioned with witnesses who are those ppl who came to attend the marriage which didnt happen,who witnessed atharv getting beaten,abdul chacha more thn enough for court to annual the marriage

So it can happen and its more easier and fast than divorce procedure but problem is a channel like SP who only can deliver regressive nonsense will not show it.

Coming to those Vachans n Mang bharna may be it cant be truely called as marriage for society but for vitharv it is.

Edited by muktha_cute - 9 years ago

Quote

Sandy

@StardustSandy

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: muktha_cute

It can be annualed as its a forced marriage,the girl was forced by her dad
They have enough of proofs for that whole village knows that vitharv marriage was gonna take place on that day in temple which didnt happen,ppl witnessed how atharv got beaten brutally,they can get records of govt hosp where atharv was admitted
All these proofs are more than enough to prove how vividha was forced to marry ravish by her dad
If they apply in court to annual the marriage on basis of proving it as an forced marriage providing the proofs mentioned with witnesses who are those ppl who came to attend the marriage which didnt happen,who witnessed atharv getting beaten,abdul chacha more thn enough for court to annual the marriage
So it can happen and its more easier and fast than divorce procedure but problem is a channel like SP who only can deliver regressive nonsense will not show it.
Coming to those Vachans n Mang bharna may be it cant be truely called as marriage for society but for vitharv it is.

There are no hospital records as Ravish saved Atharv and took his care at home (instead of putting him in hospital and putting him at display for goons to attack again ) and as far as witnesses are concerned noone speaks in the other ppl's personal matters/business dear especially not in courts and especially wen the matter is so bloody and messy, RaviDha's marriage is very much real and legal and can only be anulled if they file for divorce, till then mann se wo kuch bhi maanein it really dxnt matter

Quote

monu_tan

@monu_tan

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: muktha_cute
So as per ur logic the mistress is Ravish not Atharv
The Vachans and Mang bharna was done by Atharv to vividha in temple bfr God
Thn the so called fake marriage of ravish n vividha happened which can be annualed not even need of divorce
So Mubarako apka mistress ravish

Wat mommy beta both mistress.. 😆

@topic

Is atharv living in with Vv? Is he sleeping impregnating her while Ravish is still around? If Atharv does tgat we will happily call him mistress till then keep ur skewed logic to urself.

And yes Suman is a mistress, deal with it.

Edited by monu_tan - 9 years ago

Quote

Komal

@teribts7

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

#10

Do you even know the meaning of mistress?? If you don't know let's recap your knowledge. So a mistress is a woman (other than the man's wife) having a sexual relationship with a married man. In which format does Atharv compare to Suman??

Technically speaking Atharv is Vividha husband. They had their saat vachan in front of the temple and Atharv put his blood on her forehead as sindoor. If that's not marriage then what is?? Just because they didn't do it in front of society makes their marriage invalid??

Plus you can't compare Atharv to Suman as Atharv has never slept with Vividha. Suman knowing the truth still slept with RK knowing he had a wife and was in love with Sujata.

Quote

1 2

Suman vS. Atharv

Related Topics

Explore Topics